All Activity
- Past hour
-
Pk body's being the actual player's model.
Wembleybread replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
Was thinking about this too. - Today
-
Big ideas guy
-
-
+1 would be a really cool addition and the concept seems relatively simple, dont go too far and add looting from corpses tho
-
Pk body's being the actual player's model.
RealLaCreatura replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
Other than my concern of it lagging due to upwards of 6 meshes being on a person it definitely wouldnt be a bad addition. -
Perma killed body's instead of being the normal half life 2 which i believe is boring and kind of repetitive, should be swapped for the corpse of the actual player i have seen this done before and it would be cooler for any detective RP to actually have a dead body Infront of him instead of the same corpse over and over. This makes a more immersive kill too, to see the recipient of the PK's actual corpse makes him more identifiable via witnesses too. Doing a whack in a public place carry's the risk of witnesses snitches etc, to have someone be able to point you out "hey that guy was walking with him when he got murdered" makes the hit way more risky anyway it also adds more investigation then just clicking the "E" key and seeing the name of the person of course that will still be the mechanic but it adds a bit more if the cop has IC knowledge of this person has seen them before or was aware of their whereabouts previous to their demise. That's the pro for the detective RP but there is a few cons to criminal roleplay which a lot of people would dislike but i think its more immersive as mafia roleplay has advanced you see a lot more stuff come around and the game get more immersive to the point you cant tell your playing a half life 2 source engine and it feels like you are playing a separate game i think this breaks away from the Garry's mod part of the game and makes it its special game mode i only see benefits to the experience. I cant imagine the code to this is of a lot of difficulty but i could be wrong. opinions?
-
I cannot believe people metagame, insane! Ban all these powergamers.
-
Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.
-
You have a huge number of notes and bans including 2 Powergame PO's - one of which was a ban less than 2 weeks ago.
-
alt e on something
-
for me going into third person with F4 a couple times fixes it
-
Donny Pericolo Schmidt started following Being upside down while rejoining
-
I was in a car with a few pals, and then my game froze so i turned off my computer, did other things for an hour, and came back. When i came back, my entire screen was upside down. Ragdolling with /fallover doesnt do anything.
-
Only comment if you were involved in the situation, we don't need your opinion or input if you were not. You may only comment on an appeal if you were DIRECTLY involved with the situation leading up to the PK. Replies that are not relevant to the situation will result in a forum warning and/or ban.
-
Hello Grimmy. ARDM is not an IC issue, the following is why; I've lived the example. I was given an attempted RDM note for punching somebody during 4th of july, for mic spamming in spawn. I didn't try to kill her whatsoever, but it happened regardless. ARDM IS an OOC issue. Attempting to kill somebody for no reason is minge behavior. That's why it's called ARDM. Randomly shooting at somebody as a cop, not as a result of poor training but as a result of your arrogance, is ARDM. Randomly stabbing somebody, randomly punching people, all of that is random and unreasonable. Thereby, it's attempted random deathmatch. As for the gunfight, I strongly disagree with this choice by UA; this is well within the designated-by-staff, designed-by-staff criteria of a five minute conflict. Two minutes. It is inconsequential to roleplay if he should survive this confrontation, but it is highly consequential to roleplay if he doesn't, because the point of this rule is to allow for retaliation after the unjust behavior of the police. Shooting back at police within a five minute time period, especially the ones that tried to kill you for no reason at all, can help the victim of the ARDM icly, and this kind of thing without ic consequence for the victim would be a great deterrent to the police randomly shooting at people. Especially, if somebody just drives off and is not(* or no longer a) threat. No. This is a retarded take. "6: You may kill in self defence or in defence of your partners/faction/property (Must have F3). When you've been attacked by an aggressor and survive (you did not aggravate or bait them to hit you) you may return with a weapon to kill them. ". This explicitly states, thereby it is fair to assume from an average person's perspective, with it explicitly written to be the case, that he may return fire later. The police invited this confrontation, it is unfair to become a sudden death trap because you started a problem for no reason.
-
Poker tables+Genuine playing at card table's (blackjack etc)
Wembleybread replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
we did this in the past i wasn't a fan of it personally the Rizzuto casino would've been cooler if it had in game mechanics -
Poker tables+Genuine playing at card table's (blackjack etc)
Sauerkraut replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
you will die -
Poker tables+Genuine playing at card table's (blackjack etc)
DopeAsRoe replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
eat dirt chump -
DopeAsRoe started following Poker tables+Genuine playing at card table's (blackjack etc)
-
Poker tables+Genuine playing at card table's (blackjack etc)
DopeAsRoe replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
+1 using websites is gay and lame, i want to play in game. +5000 larp points +200 cool points +50 idea points -
Poker tables+Genuine playing at card table's (blackjack etc)
Sauerkraut replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
pokeronline + meeting in person + having a decent dupe pokeronline is arguably a better alternative than an in game mechanic. -
yow i know you denied bruce knee but i already in a new family but i swear to god i did not take any calls none what so ever i was afk so i could not take any calls thats the problem i have and the abuse NO BLOODY ROLEPLAY
THATS ALL IT IS NONE even though its denied i cant accept a pk that was not roleplayed why dont you ask the cappo for the clip not that i care anymore but ask him
-
Poker tables+Genuine playing at card table's (blackjack etc)
PlummetControls replied to Wembleybread's topic in Suggestions
+1 solid suggestion, RDR1 being the example is what i like the most, it would be the best system to add into diverge one because of simplicity and two because i don't wanna play URL links, its boring and not worth buying in 50k. This is a great suggestion and definitely should be implemented into the city. -
It would be a cool feature to have a actual "illegal" gambling racket yes you have blackjack in the casinos but in the sopranos and other mob media such as "gotti" or "goodfellas" you see backroom cardgames where they are actually playing cards. To have a actual table where you can actually play cards instead of just hitting 2 buttons, think of red dead 1's mechanics with poker. would make illegal gambling operations an actual problem for cops to deal with and it would be cool to have backroom games where players can actually participate in the card game instead of using a URL to simulate the experience. I have seen addon's such as what I'm describing on the workshop which could work with diverges current add-on list. Any questions to how this could actually be used or any disagreements you have let me know in the reply's and i can go further in detail on the suggestion
-
So two things in response to this. You were both banned as you were both involved in the situation. Just as you were involved in metagaming a mugging like 30m earlier. Where you received a metagame note (I should really extend this for the continued metagame you admitted to) It's the same in my opinion as if you were walking around with someone actively breaking the rules and actively knowing they'd be breaking the rules. With you admitting to being in a VC with him I can't argue that you weren't spurring him on in the moment to do so. Especially with you yourself mentioning that you didn't like the exact business you then targeted. I'm sure you can see how this looks
-
Ardm is an IC issue RDM is what we punish but if it's ARDM it can be dealt with in many IC ways Have a good night