Gr1mmy

It'd be kinda cool if instead of seeing what they were armed with weapon wise, or etc if all the body showed was Name: Cause of Death: Time of death: Then when killed a prop version of their weapon drops on the ground that acts like bullet casings, opening a while now level of RP when the cops come and collect it, possibly giving them the serial number, and then they can use a GSR kit to determine whether it was fired, it also wouldn't be bad to add more things that a hitman can look out for / RP with "You want So and So Dead?, I'll kill him and bring you his gun as proof." "I'll kill him and bring you his fingers as proof" etc. Might open the door to more RP, personally I think when chopping up a corpse you should also get hands, and have the ability to cut off fingers to send a message to people, this is Mafia RP After all

Free The Sack

Hello, While I'm not the banning member of staff I assisted in making the final verdict on your ban. Whilst an active threat is cause for killing someone, the individual in question pulled out their gun, then proceeded to put it on safety leading to you shooting him and his friends including one who didn't even have a gun in hand. Whilst I understand attempting to defend yourself, there's a difference between defence and opening fire on a group of people for the fun of it because someone put their gun on safety and called you scum. Here are the rules mentioned. In regards to how a user is allowed to react to verbal threats. There are two types of threats, an 'Active Threat' and a 'Idle threat'. Users may kill for an active threat but they may not kill for an idle a threat. The difference between the two is situational but will always pertain to if the person making the threats has a weapon in their hand. For example, someone pointing a gun at you and threatening to kill you. This is an Active threat. Someone saying they will kill/beat you in an argument or conversation. (Unarmed, weapon on safety etc) that is an idle threat. You are allowed to react to an Active threat in that moment (Not later when the situation is over). On that note, considering you escalated to violence in his situation you'd be the "Aggressor". You may kill in self defence or in defence of your partners/faction/property (Must have F3). When you've been attacked by an aggressor and survive (you did not aggravate or bait them to hit you) you may return with a weapon to kill them. Which means there was no reasonable level of threat in terms of shooting he group on their business.. Please read the rules, as when there is conflict there will be more staff keeping tabs on you, and more reports. So ensure you're taking the necessary steps to roleplay correctly, and make tickets on people breaking the rules so we can handle it.

#FreeTheSack!

+1 but only for oil, when it comes down to it maybe there should be a way to see how much the drug dealer is buying for without having drugs on you but it's not that hard to walk up to him with one baggy and check yourself..

Hello, Banning Admin Here. You ran over an afk man on the side of the road and your excuse was "I Thought It'd Be Funny" Consider yourself lucky it's a one day ban.. Judging from your response i believe it's safe to assume there was NITRP In the interaction, with you targeting an afk person, aswell as Minge Behaviour. I Decided to let you off with just the VDM Ban as it was early in the morning. Good luck on your appeal, For Future reference here are the rules broken. 2. Do not randomly VDM. 3. Do not intentionally run over users for no valid reason, targeting people on sidewalks, cross walks or in traffic stops for no valid reason is VDM. If you accidently run someone over in the street it won't be considered VDM if the staff member deems the opposing party at fault. If you see someone in the street and intentionally aim to run them over or fail to attempt to avoid them it will be considered VDM regardless of them being in the street or not. VDM = Vehicle Deathmatch, Killing People with a Vehicle. Minge = Someone who refuses to follow roleplay. NITRP = No intent to roleplay.

Honestly all jokes aside i agree with this, please make EU Times Even better for us, NO PD, ONLY CRIME!!!

Cool dude, That is not the reason you were pked, have a good night!

Yeah because you're friend was warned for something else doesn't mean that's why you were PKed

Hello, I'm not the admin who administered the PK but i was observing / assisting the staff involved. You weren't Pked because your friend gave you a gun, You were Pked for something else entirely. Good luck on your appeal.

Ngl, valid appeal, could you attach a video of you using the cheats in a sandbox?

Hello all, With the new addition of Drug Market Fluctuating Values, i believe we need a new form of storage, especially for those smart enough (Or dumb enough) to hold out until it's a better price. And as of such I'd like to introduce the concept of the "Sealed Case" Aka Drug Case. As can be seen above, The Sealed Case would hold 10 Baggies, and when opening it / using it there should be a /me in the chat, such as. /me (Name) Opens the sealed container. These Sealed Cases should be Felony Items therefore if an officer see's someone opening it they may move to make an arrest etc.

-1 Too many minors in the server and it's against Multiple forms of TOS That the server follows And on that topic, people just need to understand what falls under ERP and isn't ERP. as mentioned prior “/me pulls Isabella closer and kisses her while music plays from the club speakers” Is not ERP In terms of the Video Provided that is what would be considered ERP and what is Not allowed

Improper escalation falls under RDM directly, therefore he was banned as such, I don't want it to be a permanent ban personally, however what the boss says is final. "Perma on next offence" is what led to it being a permaban

From what i can see there's some clear confusion in terms of people misunderstanding the reason why you were banned so i will specify The RDM Ban is for Improper Escalation, This does not mean someone was killed in the server, This means the offending party "Riggs" Failed to escalate properly as per escalation rules in the server, most commonly deemed as "Verbal, Physical, Weaponry" In the situation i watched, There were no attempts at an arrest before the person was shot, there were no forms of Verbal or Physical interaction before bullets were fired. However judging from the proof i can confirm that An attempt of arrest was Made after the situation, and judging from the clips involved it doesn't appear as if Martin Riggs damaged the individual in the car, so in terms of the ban, it is for escalating to violence instead of attempting an arrest. Therefore Improper Escalation.