Jump to content

Jennay

Administrator
  • Posts

    74
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Jennay last won the day on October 25

Jennay had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Jennay

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Jennay's Achievements

Loyle Capo

Loyle Capo (6/14)

  • Great Content
  • Idiot
  • Very Popular
  • Helpful
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

116

Reputation

  1. Nigga is all you do is get arrested?
  2. Staff member that pked your character- VCWP means violent confrontation with police, does not necessarily mean shoot out. An officer was chasing you in the water to arrest you, during this you would go farther down into the water and punch him repeatedly. He’s taking damage trying not to drown while also getting beat by you, If someone is trying not to drown in the ocean and another person is actively beating them I would see that as attempt on that persons life. Since you were trying to kill this officer mid arrest he shot and ended you. Good luck on your appeal-
  3. This is inspirational, I truly am not hating to my full capacity.
  4. +1 da goat
  5. Jennay

    PK Appeal

    Not the first time someone underage has said you made them uncomfortable by saying weird shit.
  6. The thing is, you cant force people to be enemies you cant force conflict between factions. From how i envision this, its not going to inherently stop large embargos or positive relationships with non allies. What it will do however is let shit happen between factions that have beef but nothing ever happens with it. For the factions that are currently embargoed, instead of not being able to do much other than verbally shit talk that leads nowhere. They could get kicked out of a restaurant and in retaliation, roleplay dumping trash over the restaurant and spray paint without needing to be in a UA approved war escalation. It would give people who are embargoed roleplay and something to do as well as the people embargoing something to do. In the regards to positive relations with non allys, this isnt going to stop your don from pking you for starting shit with a faction they’re friendly with. However what it could do is lessen it, if a guy from a non ally faction im cool with talks shit to me and threatens one of my guys, instead of going to the don and being like “hey u should get rid of that guy” i could go “hey he did this so I'm just gonna have my entire faction find him and beat him to death for fun”.
  7. if u guys r gonna argue on my suggestion u could at least +1 it
  8. get stabbed again fn
  9. I think we need to rethink how faction escalations work. Right now, faction RP feels stale, conflict is rare, and High Commands are frustrated. The larger factions that make up much of the player base rarely get action outside of racket events, which only happen every six months. All year it has only been shitty factions doing their meaningless civil wars. I believe a big reason for this is that escalations are treated as something that always lead to a war. Most factions dont want to go to war over minor disrespect, but they still want to be able to retaliate without risking being cooked for fail escalation. I think we need a middle ground between doing nothing and starting a war- My suggestion is to allow minor escalations with valid clips and approval from a regular admin, without requiring an active UA approved war. Examples could include property tagging or trashing, targeted muggings, and potentially firebombings, all with clear restrictions. Offenses can be: Verbal Disrespect, Physical Disrespect, Muggings, Threats, ect. With clips of said offenses admins can approve the next step of escalations. -Getting kicked out of a restaurant can cause that restaurant to get trashed. -Verbal disrespect depending on the severity can cause a group beat down. -Physical disrespect can cause a targeted mugging. -Failed sit downs can cause fire bombings that wont cost the faction millions of dollars, or raids that don’t cause PKs. Small beefs involving property taggings or trashings can move to failed sit downs that can lead to medium escalations (fire bomb, raiding, ect.) After these conflicts occur and play out whether ending in pending sit downs, or shoot outs leaving people hospitalized the factions are not to engage for a set amount of time. Retaliation windows can only be open for so long. To prevent abuse, these escalations should require evidence, have clearly defined limits, and be logged so staff can identify patterns and determine when a larger conflict is justified. This keeps staff involved without requiring UA to handle every minor dispute. The goal is: let factions have beef, let them respond to it, and let RP develop naturally. We need more opportunities for fun and engaging faction conflicts that do not need to result in war. I am sure there is holes in my thinking and ways people will abuse that need to be covered but I just think a change is needed and would be great to see for everyone<3
  10. I blame David Crocie and Sips
  11. please
  12. did u get banned for getting groomed or was that just like a fun fact u wanted to add in
  13. cuz everybody think they reskin worth a mil
  14. this guy be known shit n stuff +1
×
×
  • Create New...