Canadian-bacon

https://forms.gle/dbcY8vYYWAPFXRbn9

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Refer to

Can you reliably reproduce this?

Moved this to bugs section. This was not intended / intentional, will soon be fixed.

Seems like you're already unbanned.

If I recall correctly, Mass RDM'ed, disconnected in the sit, basically didn't care, then posted a video of the Mass RDM bragging about it in one of the discords, so the clear lack of remorse / intentional MRDM led to a perma. What's different?

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

I understand that you are apologizing but in your last appeal I specifically laid out why you need to serve a longer ban sentence and instructed you a timeframe of when to appeal here -> 2026

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

I'll give you a second chance but if you get rebanned it's GG

Applicant has indicated he is still alive.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team! It is my pleasure to inform you that your application has been accepted. Submit a ticket on our Discord for training and to get setup.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team. Unfortunately, your application has been denied. You may apply again in 30 days. You may apply sooner if you receive permission from a Super Administrator or higher.

Actively engaging with your friends in NITRP/RDM activity is still a rulebreak, despite if he was driving or not. Now of course being the driver does have an impact on the severity of an offense or punishment but that's sort of hard to verify when appealing a ban that occurred over a year ago, especially if it was, according to him "false". In the appeal itself the user admits to having, at the minimum, been apart of a group of people who at the time were breaking the rules. So we can acknowledge that the spirit in which he or his friends engaged with the server at the time was not in compliance with our rules. The staff member in question is/was competent so it's very unlikely he targetted someone who did nothing for a permanent ban. Does the length of the ban match the severity? Maybe not! But it has been long enough to afford you a second chance. I'm just saying read the rules and say you'll do good! Food for thought.

"We broke the rules and the admin who banned us sucks." I'd be more inclined to accept this given an apology and a new found understanding of the rules, considering how long ago the ban was. Instead it reads like you held a grudge for a year+ against a guy who isn't even staff anymore. I don't think that's a big ask.

I have had people argue at me that automatic /me's reduce rp because the player isn't doing it themself manually. Also have had complaints that automatic /me's make 'sneaky' actions impossible, which is sort of true, cops will just have an inherent advantage for evidence and what not, would sort of defeat the purpose of a concealed weapon imo. Lastly while i do enjoy adding automatic /me's to things it can be spammed and be rather annoying. Things to consider.

This system does this when calculating things like bail, denying bail if you have too many charges. Adding this function as a means to somehow deter minges doesn't make sense since a minge will simply make a new character and repeat being arrested. I can add charges so if there's missing charges consult with PD HC or bingus/mecli and they can communicate with me to have charges added. I think having arbitrary restrictions to a character to add more and more charges sort of just discourages the existence of long term criminal characters so there's no real reason and the officer/state/judge can just manually look up a person's records and modify the charges based on that... doesn't need to be automatic and remove the RP

Not all attachments require the stamp