Canadian-bacon

I'll take these points into consideration, better than just ignoring the thread. For what I outright agree'ed with, we can see about amending that soon. Feel free to message me directly if you want to discuss further. I'll label this as 'partially' accepted otherwise.

I don't see how this rule isn't followed, faction alliances are very clearly defined and there's a maximum 5 factions in each? What proxies exist? If you mean puppet factions those have 'existed' or have been a thing long before conflict rules existed. Maybe, I plan on making more direct definitions for certain things, like territory, in the future, but some of it is blocked by development timelines. Unfortunately people need to confirm with us because in the past they just act on their own which generally means Mass RDM or a fail conflict, I also think level 0 is good because all you need to do is inform us of your intentions and we can look into the matter in case there was some sort of rulebreak in the initial scenario. Let's us get ahead of something developing before it's properly approved, I think it's more annoying for your RP to commence then need to be voided later. This is a good idea. I'll look about defining them. We don't really mediate unless absolutely necessary, it's listed in the thread but the two sides should agree on a third party mediator, if they fail to agree on one because neither trust the other instead of letting the RP stall or die we offer UA to possibly be an ingame mediator since we're meant to be completely unbiased. They can also opt to not have a mediator if it's necessary. Technically this is higher than the current requirement of failed sitdowns involving a mediator, is your intention to raise the number of required sitdowns? In the escalation themselves it says that if it continues it can exceed the max, for instance of a territory dispute hits the maximum escalation and one of the escalation options is to PK an opposing rival then it becomes a new offence (Murder) with a higher max esc cap, they can still begot bad blood, but the point there is if two factions start having issues one minor incident should not lead to war, factions should be rivals for a while before a war, at most here I can see editing around the definitions for max esc or the levels, also a lot of these offences are just examples, there's other reasons that aren't listed that can occur. Smaller less serious conflicts can maybe take place instead for instances of lower escalation, like instead of a bar fight leading to an all out 5v5 war the two factions can have a 1v1 conflict of firebombing / bar fights for a week.

This is your one chance, don't attempt to alt again. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

Obviously the account that shared your IP tried to join the server while the other account on the same IP was banned causing the console to ban them for alting. This isn't a unjust or false accusation, you need just need to acknowledge that when someone is banned that another person in the household should not attempt to access the server.

Regardless, the ban has expired.

Sell prices increased by a margin of like ~10% on average

This is the original account https://steamcommunity.com/id/ttdfghfgfgfgfgfvfgfvgfgfgfgf/ It's listed on your friend's list.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID, STEAM_0:0:518428298 2025-02-12 08:28:34

Hey man! Don't play on two accounts! Just stay on one! Thanks Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

Man was on Nazi Larp at 13 or younger, wildin'

https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198328539141 ? You were banned and then tried to log into a different account to avoid the ban? That is ban evading.

Seems a little OP to be stun locked mid taze. Tazers are not necessarily 100% effective at subduing a target and prongs can easily miss. It is not outside the possibility that a suspect could resist while being tazed. Armed shooter about to blow a cop's head off but the cop gets a lucky taze and the dude is stun locked unable to react? They get frozen when the taze is complete, this is an easy no from the judge's panel.

Dont do this he wants your account to be locked for spam

Just to edit the post, it's best to only output the /me on successful door kicks. Otherwise this sounds good.

An idea is tabled to change it in the future.

You said these exact things last time and nothing changed. You fail to take responsibility for your actions and instead insist the former staff member was 'out to get you' You may create a support ticket if you wish to actually put something worth losing behind your words. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Can you provide specific server/community names?

Failure to reply Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Looking into the story of the positions regarding the room raid do line up, including you being killed in the crossfire, while the hit itself is very circumstantial most of the information seems to be correct, in this instance there is no reasonable proof to definitively point this to being an invalid kill. Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.

Your appeal has been reviewed and accepted. Your character has been reinstated and can be used again.

This is pretty obviously a retaliatory killing for things that occurred on a different character. Even if it isn't the explicitly stated reason it obviously subconsciously influenced people's emotions when performing/ordering the kill. While, I can't force you to play with the person or accept them into your faction you also can't use things or feelings about situations that allegedly occurred on other characters as a reason or means to issue PK orders. Addressing this, I see a lot of internal faction PKs being done with the reason of 'bringing heat' and while this can be a valid reason to remove a potentially problematic person it's also being taken to an extreme where an individual with a felony won't be hired or will be killed just because they have interacted with an aspect of the reality of being a criminal. You are a criminal, mafia organization, it's really not uncommon to work with criminals and individuals who have felonies, having a felony or being arrested on minor charges is NOT a valid reason to order someone's death. 'Bringing heat' means that as a result of their actions there is an active police investigation or due to their actions another member of the faction was arrested and implicated, simply being arrested for a crime unrelated to the greater faction is irrelevant. You must provide direct evidence that their activities have brought heat and done damage to the faction or their members. We'll likely be demanding more direct evidence that a person being arrested would cause actual tangible damage moving forward, I.E Caused an investigation Caused a search/seizure/warrant to be issued and executed Caused a fellow faction member(s) to be implicated or arrested provided information or testimony which harmed the faction (Snitching) I will aim to amend the PK rules to reflect this. As for Francis Pastore he was seemingly not involved in the criminal side of things and could have easily been un whitelisted nor was his arrest a detriment to the faction. He will be un'pked, moved out of the whitelist and all knowledge he may have had is voided.