Canadian-bacon
Community Manager-
Posts
926 -
Joined
-
Days Won
12
Everything posted by Canadian-bacon
-
Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.
-
It's because you people don't mention the discord bans on the original appeal Also note that these bans would not have to be reversed if you simply behaved ages ago to begin with... This isn't a discord ID, but I found your account anyway. For reference:
-
whats your discord ID, wise guy
-
Please complete this rule quiz https://forms.gle/SPVExYYxTQCFkfm26
-
Please complete this rule quiz https://forms.gle/SPVExYYxTQCFkfm26
-
Please complete this rule quiz https://forms.gle/SPVExYYxTQCFkfm26
-
Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team! It is my pleasure to inform you that your application has been accepted. Submit a ticket on our Discord for training and to get setup.
-
Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team! It is my pleasure to inform you that your application has been accepted. Submit a ticket on our Discord for training and to get setup.
-
Flag Note Appeal (Slamming props into cars)
Canadian-bacon replied to Cookie Baker's topic in Denied
Respondent replied to me via discord No note appeals, this is a flag appeal sub forum, a note is a way of staff marking things about a user for other staff to see. A person can be noted for anything and serves as proof they have been informed of a rule already, preventing them the ability to claim ignorance should they break it. Notes can also be put for non rule break related things. If a note is truly invalid or inappropriate you can make a support request ticket to have it removed, but in this circumstance it's unlikely as you admitted it occurred, whether it was intentional or not is irrelevant, it serves as a marker for the future that you have been already informed of the rule's existence, meaning if you find yourself in the same situation you can't claim you were not aware the rule existed. -
16 bans, what has demonstrably changed? You still say dumb shit in discord so I doubt much is different.
-
Flag Note Appeal (Slamming props into cars)
Canadian-bacon replied to Cookie Baker's topic in Denied
Did you or did you not lose your flags -
Read the rules. Begging you.
-
Contact our support team for more information.
-
The ban will be overturned, but I expect more from you. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.
-
The yapping is insatiable. Irrelevant and with no bearing on the context of the sit / ban. True and real. Again, irrelevant to the sit and RDM report. Also somewhat irrelevant, though I find the prospect of being yelled at by anzati of all people funny ( he doesn't yell ) Shittor can give input to skyzer without directly interfering with and interrupting a sit in the manner he did. The reality here is pretty clear, your group were entering properties and starting issues with people and initiating conflicts and those groups of people were, in turn, doing that to you as well. Effectively beefing, though escalation with a non-existent faction is more difficult, it's still possible. This simply should have been a roleplay beef that was handled on the streets, within rules, your claims of having been previously attacked and told to be left alone would validate the kill but this can't be verified without providing contextualizing clips. That being said the clip supplied by the ticket maker would be an insufficient length to demonstrate proper context (0:07) and the administrator should have requested a longer clip from the TM, as is encouraged. This lack of provable context further lends to your claim regarding earlier interactions and the damage log from 10 minutes prior seems to support that. Both groups should have been given a warning to quit harassing each other and that should have been that. This situation does highlight a problem in the rules regarding reasonable time limits to return to attack someone who damaged you, which will be amended. I find this rule to be potentially relevant to this situation on both sides of the issue. I think the prospective NOI group shouldn't be harassing people on their property if they don't want to be perceived as a minge group and I believe the groups opposing them should not bait them into kills then report them to staff. Duke it out or don't engage at all. tl;dr do better RP, quit sitting in a call giggling while harassing ppl then dogpiling reply guy-esque paragraphs onto an appeal. This all can be handled in roleplay or via simple mutual warns.
-
Knocked away the multiple chances afforded to him to have the ban removed. Will require actual commitment from you, sorry.
-
Read: https://divergenet.works/forum/8-rules/ Take this: https://forms.gle/WgEmXpxXbM1g2DdEA If you are banned again it will just be re-extended.
-
Read: https://divergenet.works/forum/8-rules/ Since it's your first ban this will be reduced to 2 days.
-
You tried to evade the very light 1 day ban twice. Of course it was detected and extended. Very disappointing you chose to evade over attempting to appeal
-
CONSOLE Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID, STEAM_0:1:612390545 2022-07-28 14:58:53
-
Fuck do you mean 'our'
-
Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.