Leaderboard

Your Character or Steam Name: Spooky Pyro Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): STEAM_0:1:69780698 Your Discord ID#: 666780178290311175 Reason for ban: Metagame | PO's Length of ban: Permanent Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Apology Why should you be unbanned? I have been banned for almost two years. In that time I have made 3 appeals on this ban, understandably they have all been denied. I still have continued to play on other servers and stay active within other gmod communities, in one I have become a prominent player for my police rp (before my discharge) and pvp. I have also never alted or tried to cause severe discourse in this community. I was banned two years ago for metagame and before that I was already perma banned for rdm bait. I had a substantial amount of PO's ranging from metagame, rdm bait, and rdm. With the addition of this perma ban I reached 16 bans in total. When I was unpermad for rdm bait I said that I had changed and I was a roleplayer. But I quickly devolved back into the reasons for my removal of this community. I agree to what anzati said in my second appeal, I was associating with people who only wanted pvp instead of rp, but I am not going to act like I was too immature to not act different. Looking back into my old clips I can see that I was nothing but annoying. Sure, I was having fun but it was easy to see that other's were not. I have already apologised to the community numerous of times in appeals. There is nothing more that I can say or bring up other than how apologetic I am. It has been two years after all and I am looking to have a fresh start playing in other factions. I have had people reach out with the same question "when are you coming back". From both sides, people from the "anti-commission" zeitgeist as well as people in the commission. Some of those people have offered to pay for my unban but I always shy away from it. It is summer break and I want to try diverge again. Additional Information (images, videos, etc):

The escalation rules should be viewed as a shell and starting point, not a rigid checklist. UA looks at the full situation, all factions involved, and all relevant factors before making a determination, including faction size, recent hires, main character status, alt characters, and whether anyone is trying to gain an unfair advantage. The purpose of a lockdown / hire block is to prevent war jumping, temporary recruiting, and alt abuse. It also makes escalation uncomfortable for everyone involved, which should push factions toward a quicker resolution instead of letting the conflict drag out. If someone was actively maining a faction but never formally set it as their main, that is ultimately on the player and their faction leadership. If they were involved enough to be impacted by the escalation, they should have seen it coming and made sure their main was properly set. Leadership also has a responsibility to warn members before things reach that point. A lock can be adjusted or removed if UA believes the specific situation calls for it, but it should not be assumed. Unless UA clearly states otherwise, factions should treat the lockdown and main character requirements as active. In your case, you were scared because you thought Popov was going to PK you, so you left the faction to do hits for Supreme in another faction. Once you realized there was no orders you left the other faction and now are stuck as a civ. watching from the outside. If you want numbers.....at the start of the escalation Supreme had 140 alts(More than any other crim. faction) to Popov 30 alts, for mains there were 25 for Supreme and 13 for Popov...... this was taken into account during the main lock decision.

Your Character or Steam Name: Andy "Noir" Moris Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): STEAM_0:1:439522528 Your Discord ID#: xsfqn Reason for ban: RDM Bait?? Length of ban: 1D Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Dispute Why should you be unbanned?: Because it was not a RDM Bait. I was walking from Wright's pharmacy towards Little Italy when an unknown person noticed me and pointed a gun directly at my face. I asked him why he was pointing a gun at me and he replied "Nobody is putting up anything in your face man, "FUCK OFF" If he had answered respectfully, I would have said "my bad" and left the area. However, after being insulted and told to fuck off, I replied with "or what?" He then escalated the situation further by saying, "Or I'll fuck you up man, get outta here." I was roleplaying as a Black character living in the 1990s who had just been threatened and disrespected. If my goal was to RDM or bait someone into shooting me, I would have pulled out my gun immediately instead of following the Escalation Rules. After receiving a direct threat, I replied with "Try that shit" and attempted to throw a punch. As I started walking away, he said, "You missed, retarded." I turned back BECAUSE he INSULTED ME AGAIN. and i replied, "You don't even have the balls to fight like a real man, you fucking nerd." When I pushed his door, he pulled out his gun and SHOT me in the legs. Only after being shot i pull out my own weapon and return fire. I would also like to mention that the player returned to the scene immediately after dying. He came back, interacted with me and locked the door back (because door was left open when he died) and break the NLR Rules. If he denies this, the logs should show that the time of his death and the time he locked the door again are very close to each other. What I do not understand is, if the other player was uncomfortable with the situation or did not want to engage in that type of roleplay, why did he insult me, threaten me, and escalate the situation further? He could have continued the escalation without immediately resorting to gunfire. When I attempted to punch him, he had the option to fight back physically instead of shooting me. If he had chosen to continue the roleplay with a fist fight, I would have accepted that outcome and moved on. Instead of choosing any of those options, he decided to resolve the situation by trying to kill me. Does defending myself and returning fire after being shot really make this RDM bait? I only reacted to the options that were presented to me in character as the roleplay developed naturally. At no point was my goal to Bait someone into shooting me or create a reason to Kill another player. To summarize, he tried to kill me and failed. I defended myself and returned fire only after being shot. Around thirty minutes later, I was banned for RDM bait. I believe I followed all Escalation and Killing Rules correctly and simply reacted to the situation as it developed through roleplay. I want to ROLEPLAY, and ignoring a roleplay situation would make no sense when roleplay is the reason I am here. I am fully aware of the Killing Rules and Escalation Rules, and I have read them many times. I understand that, from an outside perspective, this situation may look like RDM bait, but that was never my intention. As I mentioned before, I was simply minding my own business when an unexpected roleplay situation happened. When I asked the staff member which part of the clip was considered RDM bait, I was told to make an appeal instead of receiving an explanation. I also requested a second opinion from another staff member because I believed the decision was incorrect, but my request was ignored. Additional Information (images, videos, etc): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mVDjrPAArgqAjN9c_?invite=cr-MSw3ZDcsMjcyODgyOTUw&v=54

Your Character or Steam Name: funkeymonkey203 Your SteamID STEAM_0:1:813338766 Your Discord ID#: 1432636197657776280 Reason for ban: Metagame Length of ban: 7days Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): dispute Why should you be unbanned? I don't remember what day this happened on I was up all night long processing meth and after I processed enough I was going to car dealership to go sell my meth to the npc in the corner of car dealer And I saw my friend getting picked up by two SOS I got up close enough to see if they were messing around but my Friend rain kept saying put me down and they kept saying no And in the clip provided from Rain and the SOS in Rain's clip you can hear them say no but in the SOS Guy's clip there is no mic audio at all which means they shut it off manually Which makes them a suspect of metagame And especially one of them are third person peeking around the corner And the reason why I was banned because was because I was supposedly too far away to hear them And if you think about it why would I take a gunfight up close on a 2V1 Additional Information (images, videos, etc) https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mTiy9lZngo7PcRYFR?invite=cr-MSxlNk8sMTE3NTYyMzEy&v=8 https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mRSauLGSgTrMg1M29?invite=cr-MSxMaDYsMzQzNTg4NzI2&v=72 https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mRSfDYnxC-SjlB-m_?invite=cr-MSw5S0csMzMwODc5MDY&v=25

Your Name: sslero SteamID: STEAM_0:0:145668774 Staff Member involved: Yugi What was blacklisted from you?: Character restriction Reason for blacklist (if given): Why should it be returned?: First of all, it has been a few months since this happened, and I don’t fully remember everything that led to this restriction. As far as I remember me and my friend mugged someone in the red area behind Urban Outfits. After that my friend got killed by the mugged players friend, and he ended up getting PKd. If I remember correctly Yugi was the one who handled the situation and he was still a moderator at that time. After the situation i left and later got a character restriction because of what was seen as a fail mug or something like that i guess? I dont have any problem with Yugi, he handled everything fairly at the time. I just dont fully remember the exact reason why I got this restriction. It has been a while since then, if possible i would like to understand my mistake better and if you think its okay, Id like to ask for a second chance because this restriction has been affecting my gameplay for a while now, and I would really appreciate if it could be removed. I promise I will be more careful going forward.

Name of Faction: Cartel de Caballero Number of Members (Minimum of 5): 42 Type Of Faction (Family, Triad, Street Gang, etc): Cartel Ethnic Background (ex: Italian, Greek, African American, Irish, etc): Cuban/Hispanic Name of Character running the faction: Carlos Caballero Your Discord # (ex: gamer#4210): vaffancul Your SteamID: 76561199153198440 Your Server playtime: 2mo 4w 2d Do you acknowledge and agree to all faction rules as detailed on the server rules page? (Yes/No): Yes Do you acknowledge that your faction discord will be owned by us? (Yes/No): Yes Provide an example of the unique Roleplay your faction will bring to the server/what type of roleplay we can expect from your faction (Images/Videos Preferred): We're aiming to heavily incorporate Hispanic culture into our RP by running several food trucks that sell traditional Cuban food. In the future, we plan to get our own Cuban cigars added which ties into our backstory as former tobacco smugglers. We also plan to eventually run a Cuban/Hispanic style restaurant. Most cartels uphold a reputation for their public acts of violence, where we are going to take it to a more hidden and professional place. Instead of dressing like some thugs, our guys will present themselves as serious, legitimate businessmen. https://docs.google.com/document/d/13qQUfVFqBn32N0XOuniL-DmwURz9SmQsWEzpKL7C93g/edit?usp=sharing Provide examples or event ideas to promote activity within your faction and keep people interested. (Reference your unique RP from the question above): To keep people interested, we will host block party style fiestas where our (or other peoples) food trucks can be utilized. We plan on frequently hosting events on the weekend where we take many of our members to eat/party at other factions establishments, giving multiple factions opportunity to RP. Organization Backstory (Min. of 250+ Words & any images): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nQXTAeW0T0zrhx-Nmee8hDEQmhmYjxNHiOH4GhwKbQ8/edit?usp=sharing

Name of Character: Snibble/Tommy Brown Character ID: SteamID: 76561199576302526 Your Discord ID#: 754422012826353706 Date of PK: Death 17: 16:47 UTC - 16/06/2026 - Reason for PK: I was asked by a faction member to follow them and give them 90650$ for a big deal in-game.When i droped the money i was PK'd. Why should you be unPK'd? What server rule or PK rule was violated?: I think i should be unPK'd, because i did no harm to the faction never brought heat to the faction and never snitched on the faction. Pk rule violated: The person receiving the order must have the identity (f3) of whomever is giving the order. If possible please provide video evidence or photo evidence if PK does not follow the guidelines: Unfortunately i do not have a clip therefore i can go by the rules - You were slained by 194728 [194728] The order must be given in-game by the Don or trusted High Command member of the family. The person receiving the order must have the identity (f3) of whomever is giving the order, they need to know who their boss is, they can't receive an order from someone they don't know. The person in question, has repeatedly done something to directly harm you, the family, or another member of the family. Unwarranted Harm in a financial (+10,000$) or repeated physical way, there has to be tangible damages, disrespecting someone once is not a reason to kill someone. This also means you cannot PK someone for mucking up JUST one time. Having continued issues or warnings about behaviour or disputes can cause escalation to a PK.

Your Character or Steam Name: Dule Pacov and Velja Nevolja Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199064040751, https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199845299653 Your Discord ID#: aleksa08287, ilkeee008_91914 Reason for ban: MRDM | NITRP Length of ban: Perm Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Apology Why should we be unbanned : Hello me and my friend are writing the appeal, we have had previous warns about MRDM and RDM, since our first ban we have calmed down we stopped making trouble we have started grinding for our faction and we played usually like every normal player, as I've said me and my friend haven't been making any trouble but our real life friend came to play the server back again he was in Kosher Nostra they have PKed his char and he got mad he lied about our faction Supreme Team and Kosher Nostra being in a conflict he told us get your guns and shoot them we didn't know think about the consequences we really apologize and this won't ever happen again you have our word we will continue playing normally we will grind, socialize and our friend told us to shoot the Jewish Deli because he was mad because he got PKed and told us we are in a conflict because of some random thing after we got banned he started laughing and telling us that he made that up. Our Serbian friend from the Supreme Team got us into his crew and he was out that night we didn't believe what our 3rd friend that got banned too said to us about the conflict we messaged him on his discord and he didn't respond because he wasn't home, when he came back on he got told that we got banned because of the 3rd guy Mare that lied the Supreme guy from Serbia teached us everything what to do and what not to do if he was there that night this wouldn't have happened because Mare lied about us being in a conflict and we are so sorry once again this will never happen again you have our word we miss this server a lot and we want to come back with something new and actually bring a normal positive roleplay to the server.

-1 I rarely speak out this strongly against giving someone another chance, but in this case, I feel it's necessary. Attached I've sent the recent DMs he sent me during the time to which I banned him. Besides that I'd like to say this. While he wasn't the worst staff member we've had, the team is currently running smoothly without him. We shouldn't lower our standards just to add more bodies. This is the Diverge of today, not a few years ago. He was recently banned and continues to disagree with the reasoning behind it. In his forum post, he simply dismissed it as "retarded." He lashes out angrily at anyone who personally disagrees with him. This level of reactivity is unprofessional for staff. Even in his likely response to post, he's likely to push back without any apology or politeness to me whom has been nothing but professional towards him throughout his ban that I administrated in good faith. That should say enough alone. As a staff member who's been here for nearly a year, I have zero notes on my account. He has over 30! A consistent pattern of bans and notes shows a lack of accountability or issues with emotional regulation which are essential for any staff member to have and maintain during their duties.

PD used to have more liberty, it's true, but the PD-Crim interactions in general were different. PD mains were very few back in the day, so most people playing PD understood what playing crim was like. Most didn't throw the book at everyone they ever arrested. A lot would act with what is fair rather than make arrests every time one came across their screen (a main example of this being white shirts minging and being killed after being told to leave places, although an arrestable offence, there was a time when basically no cop would arrest you for doing it). The issue I think we face now when thinking about how to balance PD is that people have stopped looking at it as a "side faction" to make sure the streets are not just pure chaos and have actual risk, and instead look at it as a side to pick, which, for balancing purposes, becomes a much more difficult thing for PD HC to do. The plain clothes detective rule isn't a "big deal" by itself, but I believe it reflects the change in mentality of many PD mains who now use PD as a tool purely to go after anyone they can and care less about the general health of the server and how they are affecting the equilibrium.

Reminder that String made this staff app literally less than 12 hours after crashing out at AceAdmiral, Boosted, and me in general.

Hi, With things like this it is often a case-by-case. With this one, it would seem fair to me to say that the TM did not necessarily invite conflict in the first place. The conflict begins with the gun pointing, which was minor, but worth bringing up in RP. He does so, and I would imagine had the other player simply walked off, the situation would have ended at that. Instead the verbal disrespect and further conflict ensues which is then followed by physical melee'ing and an eventual shootout. This is somewhat commonplace in the server. I will mention though that the repeated forcing open of the door is not really acceptable behavior here. In many cases, that could be seen as RDM baiting. With the prior context though, which makes the initial intent of the TM clear in my eyes, it's not a massive game changer. This previously mentioned rule was brought up without mentioning the final line: However if someone continues to disrespect you, you may physically intimidate or hit them. (Fists, melee weapon) As continued disrespect could realistically start a fight. The user then has free choice on how to respond/retaliate. If they choose to flee you may not kill them. There have been a few other relevant rules thrown around in the thread so far, but I would point both involved players to these rules, also: (Disclaimer: Initiating arguments just to attack someone when they return your insults or taking any comment as an insult and immediately escalating to hitting them can be considered baiting as proper escalation / the spirit of the rule is not being followed) and Generally you shouldn't invite conflict then try to hide behind the rules when you're killed. This can also be considered baiting as described under killing rule 6. Intentionally instigating someone or goad them into breaking a rule. Both players invite conflict in different ways throughout this situation though, and overall it feels fairly balanced. Could the TM have done better? Yes, but the other player could also have simply apologized for pointing his gun, or walked into his property without comment. With all of this in mind, it seems like naturally occurring player conflict and I don't believe a ban was necessary for this, thus the ban will be lifted shortly. I'd recommend everyone involved scrubs up on the killing and escalation rules anyway, for good measure.

With all due respect, this is completely wrong. As I said, I was minding my own business and walking towards Little Italy through the alleyway. The guy next to me saw me coming out of there, pulled out his weapon and aimed it at me. After that, I interacted with him and he repeatedly insulted, disrespected, and threatened me. After that situation, if I had just turned around and walked away without responding, I would have looked like a BITCH so instead I tried to escalate the situation in accordance with the rules. I threw a punch, but when the other player continued to disrespect me without giving a fuck, as someone who had already escalated, I then retaliated/responded freely based on Rule 2 of the Killing Rules, since my escalation attempt had failed. I dont understand what I was expected to do in that situation. Am I supposed to just stand there accept insults and threat??, and walk away without reacting?????? I followed the escalation properly and responded within roleplay based on what was happening at the time. I never had any intention of RDM baiting someone. I was insulted and threatened in character (IC). Also i asked you on sit which of my actions you considered RDM bait, or I requested a second staff opinion because I didn’t agree with your judgment, but in both cases I didn’t receive any response. Without giving me a chance to report that the other player didn't comply NLR rules, you simply said “if you have an appeal, go make one” and just banned me.

Hello! Admin who set you active here, You were killed for bringing heat to Takahashi with multiple arrests, selling firearms without the proper licensure and being an overall liability. As criminal, since you ordered drugs you accept the risk of being pk'd by joining a criminal organization!

As a cop main, and someone who used to as a detective, before the uniform policy change. It was overpowered. I think the detectives should continue wearing traffic uniform. The guy who made this forum post already retired from the NYPD and lost interest. Deny this anyway. Boom roasted made the right call to restrict detectives. This is MAFIA RP, not cop rp. We are already given larger privileges. Burns and the detectives can suck up and wear their traffic uniforms. If they wanna go PC, then have an operation ready. Ok!

Your Character or Steam Name: Matador Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199887634168/ Your Discord ID#: Matador11812 Reason for ban: RDM PO X1 Length of ban: 5 days Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Dispute Why should you be unbanned? Tim Burr and I were at harbor and TL:DR Supreme team gave us a count down to leave even though we weren't on their property, long story short Tim Burr sent one of them flying, and the next guy had his gun up ready to kill my friend for this obvious crime! Until I gunned him down. I assume this is what I'm being banned for but defending allies isn't "RDM" and if Tim Burr isn't banned then why the fuck am I banned, LOL. Additional Information (images, videos, etc): Here is a clip I stole off of one of the Supreme Goobers: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mU8pSb4fKoI0CpY7l?invite=cr-MSxkM2ksNDY5MTEzOTQ0&v=30

I've been told this is actually a *second* situation with you guys, so who knows. Apparently you all were on some fuck shit last night or something.

Well I can give part 1. User made ticket to report you two for RDM. Had the shortest clip ever, showed just like a gun on safety and a countdown, and someone got out and shot him. I told user "Hey lets make sure we're following escalation rules. i.e. when you threaten an individual with a gun you have to point it. Obviously you didnt shoot him, so not serious." Told other user "Let's make sure we're waiting till they point the gun to take a shot at them, and dont be dancing to prevent them from seeing you pull your gun" (It was tim burr) I was not made aware of the larger firefight or given any further information Later, Greenghost stated that he had a new clip and asked if it was "Handled". I said I wasn't aware of a longer, fuller clip, and that he should assess the situation himself with the new information and make a ruling. He did so, which led to your ban. P.S. "Why didnt my friend also get banned" Dry snitch ass nigga

+1 I've known Sosa for around 3 years from various different communities, he was actually a big help during the start of my Diverge experience. I'm not going to sit he and act as if Sosa wasn't a minge as I was partially victim to his antics as I was a Bonanno during his time in De Leon, but if he has been this consistent with appeals I believe he should be given a second chance. I don't think the "pay the toll" catchphrase is a fair approach to this ban and I think he should be given another chance and if unbanned should be watched for a little. I also would like to note Anzati was insanely correct with the PVP over RP comment, De Leon a group that was full of minges but thankfully they've changed their ways as of recent, ix_crazy for example, he isn't perfect by all means but he is definitely more behaved compared to 2024 and I feel this might be the same situation for Rupert/Sosa.

Your Character or Steam Name: Joe Claver Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): STEAM_0:1:129714782 Your Discord ID#: maks8235 Reason for ban: Spreading word about other rival server Length of ban: Permanent Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Its been ages since i have been on diverge and i heard lots has changed. It has been months since i even played on any mafia server, let alone diverge. Kind of realised that those servers failed to achieve what diverge had for ages and i want to get back in and RP with the community i had on there. Honestly, it was never my intention to ever leave diverge, and i never had a chance to explain that all i was saying is that there is another server on the way everyone should try, and i did not know diverge disliked them. I have been playing diverge for a while and always stuck to the rules, i wouldn't get myself banned for something like that on purpose. I had a pretty good reputation on here a while back and no one wanted me gone, and i want to experience the feeling of this server again. Much appreciated Why should you be unbanned? never was my intention to give a bad name to diverge, and i never really got a chance to explain myself, instead i was insulted and left for good. My hours on gmod in general sky rocketed from this server alone, and i spend hours and nights on it, thats how fun it was. I want to see what's new as i heard there was tons of updates, and i want to be apart of the community again. Additional Information (images, videos, etc): Nothing

add npcs that will pay for “favors” of a certain variety, I wanna sling leg on diverge networks

mane why did you jus shoot him like??? supprised yall didn't try to fail mug him lol

FYI in rains clip he’s hot micing the whole time and he isn’t making any call-outs.

nigga quit the yap

All of this is government propaganda and I will not stand for propaganda against String, still a +1!

WE want the roulette table to be brought BACK to the new casino.

I'm the professional gambler here and I know for a fact 95% of this community doesn't know how to apply perfect roulette strategy so it's just a random stroke or luck unlike blackjack that requires some sort of skill and user input.

plz unban me

Hello, The responding staff has provided you with valid evidence that can be used in an instance such as this, joining factions are always at your own risk. If you get caught doing something such as aiding the cops with any information that you may know is probably cause for factions to give orders on your character. Please make sure you pay attention to the first prompt that appears when you first join a faction.

ive never seen so much effort for a 1day wowsa

Hi Tommy im the one who wrote the orders as it was brought to my attention that you as a felon had been arming whiteshirts who didn't have the proper licensing. Along with being arrested in your company suit multiple times after being told not to draw attention to yourself when wearing the company suit. When you joined the faction you accepted the risk of potentially being pked for violating Faction rules. The main reason you were deemed a liability was your willingness to arm whiteshirts who had been turned away for not having a gun license. When it comes to the Factions gun racket any potential liability gets dealt with asap as its the biggest legal source of income for the faction and anyone getting caught selling our firearms illegally can put the store at risk of being fined heavily or shutdown. Hope this clears things up for you and best of luck on your future endeavors.

Hey @ayokool, I was the staff member that set you PK active. The true reason for your character's PK was that a hit was placed on you by the orders of Kosher Nostra command. The reasons behind the orders are speaking to cops and answering questions without a family lawyer present, which can leave room for suspicion of you being a snitch/informant. The second reason is calling the police on allied factions, for example, Bruno-Scarfo which can fall under breaking alliance rules or faction rules.

Whoever edited this shit actually has brain damage.

Or counter point, learn like everyone else and roleplay?

Having your gun off safety and pointed at somebody with clear intent to use it is not an idle threat (especially after your friend dying) Do you think he took it off safety and pointed it because it looked cool? Or he was going to give us a strongly worded message on why that was wrong? Yeah come on don't be retarded, he was going to try and kill us lol.

Shy is the banning staff member. Different incident than the one I reviewed.

They are my Serbian brothers, they have actually messaged me asking me about conflict their 3rd friend Mare said but I wasn't home at that time to respond, after I came home and I found out I called them on Discord and they explained everything that the 3rd guy that was in Kosher lied about a war or conflict idk and when he shoot they shoot too. I can assure you that they won't do such a thing again give them another chance if they do it which I am sure they won't don't ever give them a chance again appealing won't work for them anymore. +1

-1 holy retard suggestion, PC still gets abused. Only time PC should be allowed is for operations not patrols. Dets shouldn't be camping ghetto in plain clothes waiting for someone to grab a shipment with a gun on safety

Tell her you have multiple personalities disorder and it’d be rude of her to judge your condition

Have her make a char thats your in game wife, that has NEVER gone wrong ever! Good luck!

"How do I keep her from asking these questions" Uh, hit her? Come on man, think.

Hey there, So after discussing with other members of UA we have come to the agreement that regardless of the metagame claims provided this will still be denied. The main reasons for this is the amount of witnesses present.let alone other details Firstly you did attempt to mug them in the street which already makes it failmug. Heres a snippet of mugging rule 2 - “You may not mug in a public place, you can, however, pull a weapon on them and bring them to a secluded area to rob them (This can only be done when there is no one else around. EXAMPLE: The victim is alone at night in the middle of an empty street. You initiate a mugging with your firearm and take them to an alleyway so no one stumbles upon the crime. “ In the clips I can count 4 people watching you initiate the mugging, and the Rockefeller npc as well. This goes directly against that , the rules specify - If a mugging violates these rules it is deemed a 'fail mug' and the victim is not subject to a PK if killed. Should the mugger be killed during a fail mug they perpetrated, the handling Administrator may choose to still PK them as a result. To combine it with the full rule on vigilantism it states that its only a pk if you do have a connection to the target. When both of those rules combine it is a pk regardless of the metagame claim. Due to those reasons the pk will stand.

Hey, So to clear things up for you, a cop pulling out a firearm is not initiating violence, for police to start the confrontation they must shoot first. Which was not the case here, you shot at the cop first and died meaning your char got pked. There is nothing to overturn here so the pk will remain in place. I would recommend referring to the pk guidelines to brush up on that part a little bit more. Have a good one

There is a way to take cartel RP where the barbarity exists, but behind closed doors. Just because we're not stringing up bodies every day in some elaborate set up doesn't mean we're not a cartel, or that the violence isn't there. You're just misrepresenting what im saying. Most of what you're saying is merely speculation. We plan on committing violent acts, and all of our hits will reflect that. All i said was that it will be more hidden (more implying there will be some acts of public violence).

Underboss here helped work on this for a while we are very optimistic for the future and put in a whole lot of work so this could work out right. the films were the hardest to make we didn't even really have a script or a idea of what film lol. jet had came up with a idea of those like "INSIDER" interviews with the old cartel members and decided to do one too, i did enjoy the making of this, and i hope if we do get into the city you guys will see the RP we bring to the table and some of the new and old school stuff were bringing back into our faction we also have more great ideas modeling and other short story's that weren't even included on the app to make it not patchy. either way i will plus one my own app LOL!

Hey there! I'm the main staff member who was involved with this situation. To start us off, your account was flagged for item transfer and needed manual review before any action would be taken. I was the person who looked further into the logs and investigated the situation. During my review, I noticed a few things. First, your character Dmitriy "Killjoy" Krysha was PK'd on May 31st for a cop shootout. He was removed from the Gopnik account on June 2nd. Within roughly two hours, your new character, Mikalai "Sasha" Vuzkyi was added to that same account. This character was not in Popov, but instead belonged to an allied faction seemingly waiting out the 7 day timer. While on the account, Sasha withdrew, used and sold items that your previous character had helped acquire and manage. Multiple items, such as two Yoon coats, were only ever handled by your two characters. With several other items, even when other people were involved, Killjoy was the last person to handle them before the PK, and Sasha was the next person to withdraw and use/sell them afterward. Your argument that you were only selling clothes for Gopnik does not change the issue. The problem is not the existence of a gopnik account or shared inventory. The issue is that after your character was PK'd, your new character regained access to the same items your previous character helped obtain and then benefited from them. Since you did theese sales, your new character was able to profit from inventory connected to your previous character. The purpose of a PK is to end that character and separate their items, connections, and progress. If a player can immediately return on a new character, regain the same access, and continue using the same resources, that defeats the purpose of the PK system. The first relevant rule is Character Rule 7: "Likewise you may not transfer money or items between any of your characters in anyway. Nor are you allowed to act as the middleman for someone else's item or money transfer. Transferring items or money between two of your characters is not permitted under any circumstance." I am referencing this rule because, regardless of the items being stored in a shared account, the end result was your new character gaining access to and benefiting from items your previous character acquired/handled. The shared account acted as the access point between the two characters. The next relevant rule is Character Rule 9: "You cannot use a second character to assume a role you were just PK'ed/removed from." After Killjoy was removed, Sasha was added back shortly afterward and resumed the same function of being a trader/seller for Gopnik, with the same account access and inventory access. The concern is not simply that both characters sold clothes, but that your new character inherited the same access, duties and resources near instantly after your previous character was removed. In conclusion, the issue is the overall sequence- Killjoy handled/acquired/sold inventory > Killjoy was PK'd > Sasha was added to the same account within hours > Sasha accessed and used/sold the same inventory. Because your new character continued benefiting from resources and a role connected to your PK'd character, this falls under item transfer/role continuation rather than normal use of a company account. For the reasons I listed and explained, the PK was issued from me. Have a good one

-1 has 33 notes, props blacklisted, 3 bans this year so far, and had a perma for mass rdm. Not sure why he would even apply. Never had any actual good interactions with this player. Not fit for staff at all.

-1 I absolutely never go out of my way to ruin someone’s chances at anything, but I’m making an exception here. Asian Runt has been nothing but a burden to deal with. Every interaction I’ve had with this user has involved his cop character, Bruno Giang, and none of them have been positive. I’m not even going to get into the three separate reports that landed on me during my time in IA, all relating to unprofessional behavior and abuse of power. My favorite interaction with B. Giang, however, was when I approached him at the central clothing store after noticing he was plainclothed. When I asked him about it, he first denied any wrongdoing, then proceeded to /LOOC a confidential file from NYPD IA, before making farting noises as if he had just won some kind of dick measuring contest. I have listed evidence with timestamps regarding my initial response to the aforementioned situation (file was restricted upon my request, link doesn't work so please don't delete the screenshot, thanks.) This user is neither mature nor fit for a staff position.

imo I think it would be fine, just would forfeit/restrict PKs from them if theyre plain clothes. Such as a det plain clothes shooting someone however many feet away so they cant see their badge/blue name (which already kind of how it was before)