Canadian-bacon

Closed per request

Thank you for applying for a faction. Unfortunately your application has been denied. We do not believe your faction or application is sufficient enough to be accepted. You may re-apply with the above issues rectified, when re-applying keep in mind that a well written application with good grammar, and a detailed backstory will help in getting accepted.

Just buy it off a player

Yea pretty simple, got the LTAP ticket, saw a clip where the cop was leading you to cells and reading you your rights and you basically said "nah" and disconnected, then reconnected and loaded a different character. This isn't a 'panic'. Clear intent to LTARP, what you said in chat proves that you didn't care about the roleplay or consequences. Ban time + reason is simple. Your 4 other bans are ALL LTAP related. You have done this more than 6 times and still have not learned your lesson.

not for me

Fiz gun

Follow the appeal format

Acting coy like a koi fish. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

I can pick it up...

Pendred didn't have the heart to tell you but I will. He can check who's tuned in on a freq, when you did your Alex Jones parody for like 3-4 hours that one night a grand total of zero people were listening.

works for me, is this only on your end?

Character intended to lead the faction has been pk'ed. Feel free to submit a new application for a different faction / faction type if you've built the RP reputation on a new character. Thank you for applying for a faction. Unfortunately your application has been denied. We do not believe your faction or application is sufficient enough to be accepted. You may re-apply with the above issues rectified, when re-applying keep in mind that a well written application with good grammar, and a detailed backstory will help in getting accepted.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be reduced to 3 days.

Jesus christ stop making appeals and read my reply to your last one.

I replied to your last appeal here -> Please read it. Sure.

Unable to read

Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team! It is my pleasure to inform you that your application has been accepted. Submit a ticket on our Discord for training and to get setup.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Failure to take responsibility. Blames others for 'mistreating him' rather than acknowledging these things occur as a direct result of his actions.

Read the damn rules! Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be reduced to 1 day.

You make arguments claiming that it's "Unclear" that the weapon is on safety but from the video provided it seems pretty conclusive given that she pulls the weapon while not facing you, reloads while not facing you, then begins leaving only then looking behind her as she leaves, weapon on safety. This is irrelevant, as stated in the killing rules, weapons on safety are still an idle threat and further more she never actually threatened you, she did not say anything, nor point the weapon directly at you. You attacked her operating on the assumption she was somehow threatening you, which this obviously does not meet the criteria. If anything a prior history between you two only validates her logical reasoning for having a weapon out on safety, fearful of a mug (not that one is needed. A player can have a weapon on safety whenever they feel like). This is not responding in kind. She never attacked / shot at / damaged you in anyway. Your 'response' was overtly over-reactive. RDM obviously includes cases and situations in which you kill or attempt to kill a player for a non valid reason as defined by killing rules. Intention here is irrelevant since she never pointed the weapon at you and actively left the area. Once you turned the corner giving chase you could easily see she was well a ways away. That's not the reaction of someone making a split second decision like you attempt to frame it here. You consciously followed her as she left the 'situation' to then open fire at her. While the argument of 'I could not tell if the gun was on safety' can at times be compelling it does elude the fact that no threat or threatening interaction took place nor the fact that she removed herself from your space, actively walking away, the least threatening thing a person could do. To reiterate key factors to help you better understand. Players do not need a reason for a weapon to be on safety. She never threatened or attacked you. Yet you attacked her (meaning the argument is not hypocritical) She ran far away back turned and was not an active threat in any manner. You can't shoot someone believing they are threat, they need to be an actual threat. (Again, she did not shoot you) I think you have a severe and fundamental misunderstanding of the killing rules (based on POs as well) and attempt to argue in bad faith to justify your actions, whereas a simple acknowledgement of the facts and actually LEARNING the rules would better you in the long term. However I do recognize that you did stop firing in the end.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

Read the rules. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.