Canadian-bacon

Chalk outlines disappear after map change. The idea of using government characters to clean up crime scenes will simply be abused to metagame / powergame. Having an alternate character you can use to clean up a crime scene you or your faction caused. I periodically go around and clean up left over blood stains, but they need to have been there for a bit.

Good, I want you to be clean for at least a year before you appeal again. You need to wait.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

I handled a similar ticket regarding this earlier. A faction was attempting to roleplay run their business next door and have a meeting in their backroom. A cassette player was placed intentionally against the corner wall of your property to maximize audio overlap and placed on the loudest possible setting with the direct intention of annoying them and disrupting their roleplay while you were outside their shop looking in. Considering that your property was empty of any person or placed dupe I deduced that there was no active or valid roleplay occurring that warranted the music continuing at that volume and deleted the cassette player. If you are intentionally engaging with an aspect of the server in bad faith to negatively impact someone's gameplay for no reason that is considered minging / NITRP, you are not providing any roleplay benefit and the sole purpose of your actions are to annoy another group of players, regardless if you claim that it is for valid RP reasons. In these instance staff members have told you to stop and when that happens you must abide by their demands I understand you may have been under the assumption this was acceptable from Dong but he simply gave you $1,000 to comp you for losing $100 when he deleted your hifi which he assumed was the issue you had with it, though he should have informed you that intentionally using music boxes to annoy or disrupt players is not permitted and can be viewed as NITRP. While I believe that Sexaphone was justified in his ban, though the length could have been shorter, In this instance I will remove the ban as it's reasonable to believe you were given incorrect information by a staff member, but going forward do not misuse music players to disrupt other players roleplay and if a staff member instructs you to stop doing something, even if another told you it's ok, comply until you can get the opinion of a staff member with a higher rank. Will mitigate this issue from a mechanical perspective in the future to prevent it from being a further issue.

https://forms.gle/dbcY8vYYWAPFXRbn9

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Refer to

Can you reliably reproduce this?

Moved this to bugs section. This was not intended / intentional, will soon be fixed.

Seems like you're already unbanned.

If I recall correctly, Mass RDM'ed, disconnected in the sit, basically didn't care, then posted a video of the Mass RDM bragging about it in one of the discords, so the clear lack of remorse / intentional MRDM led to a perma. What's different?

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

I understand that you are apologizing but in your last appeal I specifically laid out why you need to serve a longer ban sentence and instructed you a timeframe of when to appeal here -> 2026

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.

I'll give you a second chance but if you get rebanned it's GG

Applicant has indicated he is still alive.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team! It is my pleasure to inform you that your application has been accepted. Submit a ticket on our Discord for training and to get setup.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team. Unfortunately, your application has been denied. You may apply again in 30 days. You may apply sooner if you receive permission from a Super Administrator or higher.

Actively engaging with your friends in NITRP/RDM activity is still a rulebreak, despite if he was driving or not. Now of course being the driver does have an impact on the severity of an offense or punishment but that's sort of hard to verify when appealing a ban that occurred over a year ago, especially if it was, according to him "false". In the appeal itself the user admits to having, at the minimum, been apart of a group of people who at the time were breaking the rules. So we can acknowledge that the spirit in which he or his friends engaged with the server at the time was not in compliance with our rules. The staff member in question is/was competent so it's very unlikely he targetted someone who did nothing for a permanent ban. Does the length of the ban match the severity? Maybe not! But it has been long enough to afford you a second chance. I'm just saying read the rules and say you'll do good! Food for thought.

"We broke the rules and the admin who banned us sucks." I'd be more inclined to accept this given an apology and a new found understanding of the rules, considering how long ago the ban was. Instead it reads like you held a grudge for a year+ against a guy who isn't even staff anymore. I don't think that's a big ask.