Jump to content

Greenghost_906

Administrator
  • Posts

    82
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Greenghost_906

  1. +1 The man may have done some funny things in the past, but he’d be a genuine good addition to the staff team. He has a diverse experience in Diverge, being a former faction leader (even if he was a gay biker) and current actual good cop.
  2. Hi! Banning staff member here. As per escalation rules: You chose to shoot him for verbal threats with a gun on safety, specifically what these rules advise against. Not only that, but they were actively trying to leave by the time you chose to shoot them. There was no active threat and the situation was coming to a close, and you chose to escalate it incorrectly.
  3. Hi! PKing admin here. I understand you're new to the server and that this may feel harsher because of it, but this PK has been applied in the same standard that the staff team consistently uses. You may disagree with the haste the officer used when moving to arrest, but that would be an IC issue to be argued ICly. Instead, you chose to open fire on the officer. This is a fair course of action, but, as I explained in the sit, it is one that has its consequences for failing. To prevent everyone from escalating to violence against a police officer willy-nilly, there is real consequence to it, that being the potential permanent death of your character. You and your friend opened fire on a cop, which brought the risk of dying when the officer returned fire. TLDR; you and friend shoot cop, cop shoot back, you and friend die. This is the risk you took in opening fire on the officer and you missed your shots. Had the officer opened fire first or unjustly escalated the situation to violence, this would be a different result. However, you were the one to escalate.
  4. The issue is they’re in a jail and not prison. That and as a security concern I’d rather not have a mobster be visited by his fellow mobsters (especially if it’s a Don who can then issue orders from jail directly to his guys). Get out on bail or try to expedite your trial, prison RP isn’t really a thing and we don’t have a visitation space.
  5. Reminder that String made this staff app literally less than 12 hours after crashing out at AceAdmiral, Boosted, and me in general.
  6. (I bet he didn’t make the support ticket)
  7. Shy is the banning staff member. Different incident than the one I reviewed.
  8. Banning admin here. I was originally flying around and saw the events that happened in this clip (https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mS0ZkTZgmW2FVbTnT?invite=cr-MSxyMk0sMTMxODc2MjE&v=28), then chose to leave it be as you could have a reasonable excuse for it. However, I then received a report on you for this very stove bombing, so I decided to check your logs alongside Boosted who I was in VC with. Your past five pages of logs show you: a) buying a shit ton of stoves and plinking ammo b) stovebombing over the course of half an hour, dying occasionally within that period only to keep going. On top of this, you were only recently unpermabanned, which Boosted advised me to factor into the length of your NITRP Ban. It's clear that RP was not the intent of your actions. I also found this individual doing the same as you right when I finished up with your ban (https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mS1mUaYGsC6OyB1s1?invite=cr-MSxwOWQsMTMxODc2MjE). Both of you were on alt characters which clearly were meant to be expendable.
  9. Hi, banning admin here. When you initially made the ticket I informed the officers of your time limit and they indeed made the attempt to speed up. I was informed by them that you disconnected just before they were going to sentence you, which I deemed as reason enough to warrant the ban. Logs show that you indeed signed the plea deal only to disconnect before they could sentence you.
  10. -1 Not the best timing to do this immediately after last night. I respect the apology (to calink) and all, but I don’t think someone that prone to crashing out can be a reliable staff member.
  11. I'd also like to add, the incident occurred and the guy was arrested LATER. The report and ban happened over an HOUR after the incident because the guy was arrested for murder
  12. Hi Owen Davis here. He literally just PK'd someone.
  13. Definitely worth of the unban, idk what he did
  14. I’d like to thank Howie for being the reason Char Restriction was made
  15. “Let’s kill out the entire PD because they’re doing their job.” SuperTsar explains it well, -1
  16. if I can't seize trat you should be able to tear it down for the government. +1
  17. If poor Jimmy is illegally carrying a gun, maybe he's fucked, but it also adds a level of little Jimmy hearing those shots and knowing he may need to lock the fuck in and hide away or submit to a search he knows he'll pass if he plays it smart (more tech in terms of reacting to your environment and preparing yourself). Like I said, it won't detect the cocaine in his inventory, just the fact that he is indeed strapped and ready to blow your shit clean off at a moment's notice. Merely having a gun doesn't immediately escalate to probable cause and give cause for full search.
  18. Hey it's your local legal nerd who wants you to all get arrested. So, currently in the server we only have fully intrusive searches (by legal standards). These searches require probable cause and the searcher gets to see EVERYTHING you have on you. However, there is a lower level of search called a "Terry Frisk." This is essentially when the cops have reasonable suspicion you have committed a crime and could have a weapon, so they 'pat you down' for any apparent arms. What I am proposing is adding Terry Frisks as a function to bridge that gap. The way I'm picturing it is the same way the breathalyzer and EMS prompts are, where you ask to frisk someone then get a /it in return for "you feel the handle of a weapon" or something like that. It wouldn't detect drugs or anything else, it'd just detect the concealed weapon. At that point, it's up to the officer or whoever is frisking the other person on how they act with the knowledge they are armed. It adds more RP and can also apply to criminals frisking someone else for a weapon during a deal or before they're about to whack them. It wouldn't solely help police and the function could be available for other means. Don't just "-1 because police bad." If you have genuine issues or possible adjustments, feel free. Edit: Maybe have the /it clarify if they feel a melee weapon handle or a gun handle. They could see its a melee weapon and disregard, or notice that the man in front of them is strapped and has the potential to put a 9 in their forehead in less than 2 seconds.
×
×
  • Create New...