eddiejohnson

Is this not already possible? A judge can already delegate certain things like this, it's just not done often. If they really wanted to, they could assign a specific officer that does the "check-in."

At the very least, being able to hide our names as being blue and showing our title would be nice when going on an approved UC thing

Hello! As a detective currently, I do agree that our plainclothes abilities should be less restricted as they are now. Now, to help with transparency, having to file paperwork about it isn't a terrible thing. Though, this issue faced is that we need to have a very well documented reason for going plainclothes (which means we can't just patrol in plainclothes). Like I just said, having to file paperwork is not bad. But having to have a pre-determined reason to go out makes it difficult to find crimes to begin with. Obviously, we do what we can, but having less restrictions while still having common sense rules might not be a bad thing (No plainclothes during wars for example).

Hello. I'm the officer who accidentally walked into the scene. I don't really have an opinion as I don't think it's mine to give, though I might as well provide any context that might be useful. I was walking through the ghetto doing normal sweeps alone. As I walked upstairs, I saw two individuals: one being Bambozzini and the other being his accomplice. Both of them had weapons out, which I quickly snapped a photograph of (attached). It was pretty apparent to me that you were casing this one particular apartment (possibly for a robbery, or as we know with the gift of hindsight, a targeted hit). I noticed that you were standing over the door and getting up close to it before pulling back. When I approached, I quickly ordered you two against the wall and detained you (which for some odd reason, you decided to comply with). While I was questioning you two and without prior knowledge, that random individual opened the door and started firing upon myself and you. He was quickly handled. The rest is the rest. Once again, I have no stake in this. Honestly, the whole situation was a jump scare.

Ya'll... when you chatgpt your +1 comments at least TRY to use different prompts like lets be deadass

ok there is no way that this is fair at all

remember

Memorial

Menlo

Neural

mellow

What does this have anything to do with anything or am I missing context

+1 Every interaction I had with White-Collar proved he was part of some larger story that he was building. He is an incredible leader with amazing potential to use a legal faction as a medium to ramp up the activities he's already been doing.

im sorry, but you really have to put your head in the game a little bit and figure out which cop has your name, just like you would for anybody else...

A rather simple suggestion... Make dash cam recordings extend beyond that of seven feet in front of the vehicle. We are in the 1990s, and there's no reason why hand-held cameras have a much higher range than professionally installed cameras on police vehicles. Plenty of dashcams in the 90s had recording range well over 30 feet.

Guys, I feel like the casino part of the map is underserved and lacking with activity. We should turn the area across the street from the car dealer to be a casino

+1 Always loved the idea of having photographs be an actual item

The issues you are complaining about is a result of the competition that is bred through these racket events. The governing idea is that whoever gets the most points wins, but how do you get these points? You take risks... If you want to have the best racket and beat the others, then you need to take the greatest risks and plan accordingly; this includes suffering from legal consequences. Accounting for the risks in your planning adds to the depth of the event, which was touched upon by others. Not to mention, there was not really more than 10 PD on for most of the event in small groups of twos or threes. As someone on their police character throughout the event, we largely ignored minor crimes because there were people being capped in the streets with restricted weapons. We had to pick what we engaged with and what we fell back from, which meant more than half of the crimes that we witnessed went unpunished. We were also completely surrounded in most instances, which meant that it was really easy for your friends to dispatch the officer trying to make an arrest. Again, another risk that adds to the depth of the event. Basically, what I'm saying is that having the police around--with the same rules as the last event--makes it much more than a team deathmatch. And anyway, why should someone running around with coke and guns on their backs while shooting people be let off easy because its an event?

+1 ASS APPROVED!

Okay. As you can tell I am very intelligent. Thanks

When one goes to make an advert through the listings, an error occurs when trying to append an image with it. The images, which are handled through Imgur, require a URL that follows the EXACT following format: https//i.imgur.com/example.png. However, Imgur no longer formats their URLS like this; instead, they follow a format like this: https://imgur.com/a/example.png. Because of this change, the in-game system does not accept any images, even when attempting to reformat to its parameters.

+1 Absolutely. The dyno bot system makes a ticket incredibly annoying and makes them widely unenforced

-1 We have enough car chases as it is; why would we incentivize more chases while making them a slap on the wrist?

+1 This is an incredible idea. It's sometimes rough being locked to only a few selections when you want to try and have specials. Would be great!