Jump to content

calink

Seasoned Administrator
  • Posts

    333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by calink

  1. triple the height of the imperial buff mopeds add freakish ghouls to the sewer
  2. calink

    Nb2x95 Ban Appeal

    Yeah, that's the powergame part
  3. calink

    Nb2x95 Ban Appeal

    Hi Here is the clip I was provided with, as you can see you left the item on the ground for well over 20 seconds, in a public zone, enough time to cause issue for the players and faction, and effect their ongoing RP. https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/liqM9eXQUtDg-6jcQ?invite=cr-MSxUUHQsNTExNDQzMTE&v=39 I will reiterate the length of the ban was determined with input from other staff members, and is intended to give you time to understand why studying the server rules and respecting them is important. Hopefully during your ban you will understand there are consequences to your actions, and reading the server rules will prevent you from having these issues in future. Once again, good luck in your appeal
  4. calink

    unpk

    PK Appeal Format Below is the format that you must followed when making a PK appeal, you must copy all sections and fill them out in detail. Rules: You may only make one appeal per PK, if you are denied you will be unable to appeal for that character again. You must appeal within one week of your character being PK'd, appeals posted after this time will be automatically denied. You may only comment on an appeal if you were DIRECTLY involved with the situation leading up to the PK. Replies that are not relevant to the situation will result in a forum warning and/or ban. You must follow the provided template for the appeal, failure to do so will result in an instant denial. Name of Character: Character ID: SteamID: Your Discord ID#: Date of PK: Reason for PK: Why should you be unPK'd? What server rule or PK rule was violated?: If possible please provide video evidence or photo evidence if PK does not follow the guidelines:
  5. calink

    Nb2x95 Ban Appeal

    Hi I was the staff member who administered this ban - For one, you blatantly powergamed, dropping a brick of marijuana at the door step of a property, and running away - I have the clip that shows you did not immediately pick this up, I will post that should it be necessary once I am home. You also continued this behaviour after the fact, in the ghetto. Secondly, you were RDM'ing when I was spectating your play afterwards, something you claimed was okay as you 'knew the person' you killed - I was lenient and downgraded this to a NITRP, which was exceptionally fair considering your extensive notes for RDM. When it comes to your ban time, I had spoken to a Seasoned Admin about this case, and asked for some advice on the severity of the situation. With his advice, aswell as another member of staff, I decided on 5 days - Due to your extensive notes and your insistence that I 'only ban you for a day' as a favour, it felt like you needed some time to truly consider the consequences of your actions. You have gained an impressive wrap sheet in a very short time - I suggest you spend the remaining 4 days considering what it means to provide valuable roleplay to the server, and reading up on the rules. Good luck on your appeal
  6. calink

    Take all button

    It takes 10 clicks with a 'one mississippi' between them if you want to save yourself from spamming and from accidental shooting They also already 'shift click' into place like ATM's now do which is nice I think it's manageable currently but if there's no negatives to adding it, why not increase the QOL
  7. If the play time is actually incorrect, they seems like a great choice Good app +1
  8. Hey man can we get an update

    1. Coconut

      Coconut

      Update on what?

  9. calink

    Velvet Union

    Low qual app and also the last thing the server needs, imo
  10. The bargaining implies you know how silly that is
  11. calink

    Daviss' Staff App

    Still a poor app for a staff member compared to the other 2 It's a staff app, the response was based on the individual 'I think we should enforce the rules' - Doubt any staff disagree with that
  12. calink

    Daviss' Staff App

    I can agree with a guy without thinking they'd be a good staff member I think he sounds objectively bad for staff considering the whole 'I want to be a dick to people' powertrip Compared with the other open apps this is poor
  13. +1 has a lot of experience, not sure what other gmt staff there are other than myself too
  14. calink

    Daviss' Staff App

    -1 because of the whole 'im going to be an ass thing' being the main push of the app, also curious how you were bad staff in the past though i do think points on being stricter on minging are super valid - it's gotten so much worse in recent months
  15. +1 have known him to be realistic and reasonable, despite having very little interaction
  16. +1 good guy, been around awhile and well spoken, I'm sure he'd make an efficient and considerate staff member!
  17. Could do with a much more detailed response to basically every question!
  18. Seems like a good guy, honest and non-drawn out staff app, has been staff in the past +1
  19. I said your behaviour wasn't malicious, you were ignorant to the rules, and that is okay. You told me you believed there were 10 people who enjoyed the roleplay, which cancels out the people who reported it, and that they'd join you in a staff report. Feel free to open that report if you see fit, I am sorry you are unhappy with my responses
  20. Hi - As a final response: Your PTSD RP was invalid, and not a reason to begin conflict with the police - which you did by spraying bullets and hitting them numerous times. It also wouldn't have helped you IC-ly with your court case. The decision to ban you and treat this as a rule break was mine, not the players. They did not report you for RDM or Cop Baiting, but with the information provided via logs, clips and testimonies that is the outcome I deduced. I tried to have more productive communication with you, but you were more interested in telling me about how you would be making a staff report with your 10 friends if I punish you. When you are unbanned, I hope you will not insist on 'roleplaying' in the same way. Thankyou for sharing your perspective
  21. Your ban was unrelated to IC law, and was to do with your server rule breaks. I apologize for a lack of clip to show you, but your sprees are findable in logs, and your own ban dispute details quite well that you broke the rules. As specified - your PTSD roleplay is not a valid reason to engage in conflict. I don't believe you did this maliciously, and I'm sure you will hopefully have learnt from this experience, and be able to provide better, rule-aligned RP in future.
  22. Hi, I'm the staff member who handled this ban - Firstly, I'm sorry you feel your ban was unjust, and I'm hoping I can make it more clear as to why I had ruled this way. NITRP: In terms of this clause of your ban, your PTSD roleplay is something you are welcome to build into your character, in terms of casual roleplay moments such as speech, mannerisms, and talking points, I think it could provide a really interesting character for others to interact with. The reason this fell short for you, is due to 1. your lack of truly bringing that character into your interactions with others, and 2. due to it only really existing to justify your shootouts with the police. The 4 officers who I dealt with had individually reported you over a course of time for PK tickets, but due to the time these weren't able to be handled. Every time you were hospitalized (killed) you would return again and engage in the exact same behavior, but none of these other players were aware or supportive of your PTSD roleplay as a reason to be shooting them. This leads me to look at character rules 11 and 12, as well as how your gameplay is preventing these other players from achieving the RP they are looking for when they play PD. When I eventually took the ticket "I have a question for staff" (Or similar) and they explained the situation, I felt it was the correct course of action to follow up rather than let this cycle continue, and leave a sizeable group of players unable to enjoy the server. 11. You may not have a minge/non-serious character for 'messing around' 12. You may not have a character for the express purpose of mugging/raiding RDM & Cop Bait: If you were to read through the Killing Rules again (which can be found alongside plenty of other server rules on the link provided) there are a few clauses that go against your killing reason. 15. In the same vein there are still times when you can't shoot police and it would be considered RDM. You may not KOS Police for no reason. 18. Generally you shouldn't invite conflict then try to hide behind the rules when you're killed. This can also be considered baiting as described under killing rule 6. Intentionally instigating someone or goad them into breaking a rule. There are no rules or mentions in the Killing Rules that support PTSD as a reason to engage in conflict with the police, especially without any prior interaction or RP, even with your characters past in the PD whitelist. Hopefully that highlights the key reasons why I decided on your ban!
  23. calink

    SJ Staff App

    -1 - I think with the prior bans and such a more detailed and well thought out app would've been necessary
×
×
  • Create New...