All Activity

your lack of critical thinking is why you should not be unbanned

+1 I have had no bad interactions with this guy. Just don't be doing staff things if you drink/get drunk.

+1

IDK YOU!!!!!!!!!

+1 I like him, he is not an idiot

https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/iiy8opxN5vm3MZ1ys?invite=cr-MSxnOWwsMTcxMDE5MDQ1&v=19 From the vault...

Glazing the chick with a dick... damn

-1 Dude is solid and a player and has ben around a lot I like him as a homie, But due to the fact i have dealt with him and joining a faction i was in on a alt char i personally cant recommend him for a staff member as to me it shows he's willing to alt so what else. but if he gets accepted he does.

https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/izdjouMHFiEKPriUe

Maggy Finch was not only a member of the server but the glue that held it together! What an impact left by such a strong and empowering man. WE, yes we, all loved Maggie Finch and miss him. If you're seeing this, please come back, Maggie. I have 2 favorite memories When Maggy Finch first started the server https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/2653JY4JdbKxge?invite=cr-MSxYcDMsMTk3ODk5MjU1&v=30 Ix_crazy_xi and I rolled for whether I should kill him https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/idWh3zH6jJ15iIY5d?invite=cr-MSxrbWksMTk3ODk5MjU1&v=12

+1

+1 Good guy

yo im just putting this here bc why not

Hello! As explained by Lunar you were PK'd for VCWP! This tends to happen when you try to MRDRM them from a rooftop. While investigating your case I looked into Lunar's logs to verify how he explained how it happened. And a few things are confirmed. He was not on the server when the ticket was originally made, he told the server as a whole to remake any PK tickets when he did connect as no admins were on that could take your PK as the only other admin online had been involved in your killing, and he was handling your PK ticket the same time another staff member was handling your RDM ticket. After taking your PK ticket he went straight from his staff char to his cop char. At which point yes he saw you had the same name as the character who was just PK'd. He should have informed you on his staff char but he opted to do it on his cop char as that was also the one involved in the paperwork to changes a cop char's name. Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.

Hello! So, as already explained by Calink your PK was the result of a VCWP. You decided to shoot a cop, tried to run in that same moment, and failed miserably before being killed for your own actions. Let us go through why it will be standing as is. You bring up Howie's Pk appeal which I also reviewed. If you think your two situations are remotely similar you are delusional. He didn't kill a cop. He shot one when missing someone else, immediately put his weapon away and was attempting to apologize when he was executed by a probie. You executed a cop then were killed while trying to flee the scene in the same interaction. You keep bringing up this argument of "Oh the situation was over". No, it wasn't. You had just shot and killed an officer triggering your PK active time. In that same moment that you try to drive away the killing officer shoots you. You still attempt to flee instead of deescalate the situation at which point you wreck and then the officer finishes the violent confrontation. Just because you turn around doesn't mean you void the confrontation that just happened and does not void your PK active timer. You killed a cop and then failed to flee and died as a result of it. Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.

+1

+1 My minge is ready

same here. -1 Also strongly agree, nothing personal.

will you stop with the piss highlighting

I understand the concern about creating a loophole (“I was running so I’m no longer a threat”), but I don’t believe that applies here in the way it’s being framed. This was not a case of briefly turning away during an active gunfight. This was a full disengagement followed by flight, with no re-engagement afterward. There is a clear distinction between momentary repositioning during a confrontation and ending that confrontation entirely to attempt escape, which is reflected in the clip from my perspective. In the case of Howie Hoang, the PK was overturned by Senior Administration specifically because TroubledGhost was determined to be “no longer an active threat” at the time lethal force was used. Even though there had been a prior violent interaction involving a firearm, the deciding factor was that the threat had ended before the kill occurred. I believe that distinction is directly relevant here. I also want to address what appears to be reliance on speculation in evaluating this situation. Portions of the justification seem to be based on what I might have done, could have done, or intended to do, rather than what was actually occurring at the moment I was killed. Even from your argument about LogicNova being unable to pursue, I crashed my car and ran, instead of organizing units and prioritizing an attempted murder of an LEO over a vehicle pursuit, he shot me to PK me, effectively executing me when he could've organized units as a Sergeant to arrange my arrest. I believe this should be assessed strictly on observable actions and facts. Arguments based on potential future actions, such as the possibility that I could have re-engaged, or the officer's had to recourse are inherently speculative and go beyond evaluating an immediate, active threat. I would respectfully ask that the decision be grounded in what demonstrably occurred, rather than hypothetical scenarios. Lastly, I want to clarify that I am not trying to create a loophole or avoid consequences for my actions. I fully accept that I initiated the situation and the risks that came with that. My point is that PK validity should be determined by whether a threat is still active at the time lethal force is used, not solely by the fact that a threat existed earlier. If applied too broadly, the current interpretation could create issues in the opposite direction, where officers default to lethal force to end situations rather than pursuing arrest, effectively removing the need to justify use of force. Even if my initial actions were improper, that would not automatically justify a PK if the situation had already de-escalated, it raises the question of whether this becomes retaliation rather than a response to an active threat. Ultimately, this comes down to how the situation is viewed: (a) a continuous, ~20-38 second, active, ongoing violent confrontation, or (b) a concluded confrontation followed by a pursuit where I got shot after the violent confrontation ended. AND if police are allowed to execute criminals instead of attempting to apprehend them. I believe the latter more accurately reflects what occurred.

that shi aint happening gng

This is actually in the works already, @Boomroasted was cooking up something like this for some fun wider roleplay, I believe

thank you mike brown

Let’s all organize a parade and have a big parade all around south side. So much division in this community, let’s come together, as a server.