All Activity

Folk.

This is just simply RDM. Most akin to RDM for disrespect, or any other RDM that can be considered skipping the chain of escalation that is required prior to killing. Clip provided by the TM outlines it perfectly well, and you do not warn nor otherwise attempt to engage with the individual in question outside of some snarky remarks before instantly blasting him dead. The context that you are referring to is clearly outlined in rules, as 4lights notes above. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

are you the kid i kidnapped on my cop char and held in the basement of TH8 for 3 hours?

I understand the reasoning behind the decision, but I disagree with the characterization of this as RDM. The shooting did not occur out of nowhere. The interaction had already begun near the Car Dealership, where the Trackhawk driver engaged with me and Joe Dirt and the situation escalated into hostility and threats. We subsequently left the area and went behind the Casino, but the same individual continued following us. This is the reason my friend questioned him by saying, “why are you following us man, like we are some kind of attraction man.” His continued following us is important context. We were not randomly encountering an unrelated player and shooting them without prior interaction. There was an ongoing confrontation between us, and we had already attempted to leave the original location before he continued following us. When he responded with “I'm not worried, bitch out man,” I interpreted that response, combined with the preceding interaction and his continued pursuit, as an indication that the confrontation was continuing rather than ending. I therefore fired because I believed the situation was going to continue escalating, additionally I could not see what guns on his back he had as he also had tinted windows. I understand that the clip does not show me giving multiple warnings, and I am not going to claim that I remember giving specific warnings when I cannot verify that. The incident occurred two days ago, my memory of the exact sequence is imperfect, and unfortunately my Medal TV directory is corrupted, meaning I cannot access my own recording to verify the interaction. However, the absence of a warning in the available clip does not make the shooting a random deathmatch. There was an established interaction, continued pursuit after we left the original location, ongoing hostility, and a confrontation immediately preceding the shooting. Those circumstances are fundamentally different from randomly killing another player without prior interaction. I also want to address the suggestion that this was a “crash out” because I had recently been PKed. That was not my intention. I was genuinely concerned because my character had been targeted by numerous people previously, and I believed this was another situation in which someone was deliberately following us and looking to continue a confrontation. My decision was based on that situation, not retaliation for the previous PK. I believe the appropriate question is therefore not simply whether the available clip shows a warning immediately before the shooting, but whether the shooting was an unprovoked and random killing. I do not believe it was. There was a continuous interaction between the parties, we attempted to leave the original confrontation, and the other player followed us and continued engaging with us. For those reasons, I believe the incident should not be classified as RDM and I respectfully request that the ban be reconsidered.

I know what you did once in 2021

You shot a guy in the car without warning him. You had already left the server by the time I handled the ticket. On the given clip you ran after his car as he was pulling away. Your friend asks 'why are you following us man.. like we are some kindof attraction man''. To his response 'I'm not worried, bitch out man'. At which point you just opened fire. No warnings were given by you or your friend and you positioned yourself right next to his car and follow him to shoot. If he was threatening you overtly, you need to provide evidence and give multiple warnings. Show your side, post a clip. Non of which I saw on the offending clip, you also didn't escalate either by physical confrontation. This was also a few minutes after you got PKed by an officer in sewers, so the assumption of a crash out seemed valid to me. You also have the phonebook of staff punishments on your record influencing the ban length decision.

MASSIVE +1

his age and playtime might be a bit low, but his application seems valid and i dont see any reason not to give him a chance! +1

YES!

Michael Bolivia | Killerbugjuice38 STEAM_0:0:635365790 1373540534521565205 / krueger__. RFB:RDM, Extensive PO's. Duration: 1W I would like to dispute this ban because I believe important context surrounding the incident was left out. The incident in question occurred two nights ago near the Car Dealership. I was with my friend Joe Dirt, and we were walking around and talking when a grey Trackhawk approached us. The driver initially began talking with us, but the interaction escalated into insults and eventually explicit threats to kill both me and my friend. Because of this, we attempted to disengage from the situation rather than escalate it. We walked away from the Car Dealership and continued toward the area behind the Casino near the benches and parking lot. Despite us leaving the original location, the Trackhawk followed us and continued making threats and insulting us. At that point, I believed the situation had escalated beyond simple verbal harassment. The individual had followed us after we attempted to leave and had repeatedly threatened to kill us. I did not know whether he was armed or whether he intended to act on those threats. Because of this, I believed there was a legitimate possibility that the situation would escalate into an actual attack. After the individual continued following us and making threats, I drew my weapon and fired. My intention was not to randomly kill or RDM the individual, but to protect myself and my friend from someone who had followed us while repeatedly threatening our lives. I understand that, without the preceding events, the shooting could appear to be an unprovoked attack. However, I believe the preceding threats, pursuit, and continued harassment are important context when evaluating what happened. I also want to point out that I was banned while I was not in the server, meaning I was not present to provide my account of the incident or respond to the accusations before the punishment was issued. I am therefore asking that the incident be reviewed using the full context, including any available recordings, witness statements, logs, or other evidence showing the preceding interaction. I understand that firing a weapon and killing another player is a serious action and I am not claiming that the situation cannot be reviewed. I am asking for the circumstances leading up to it to be considered rather than treating the shooting as an isolated RDM incident. Based on the threats, the continued pursuit after we attempted to leave, and my belief that the individual intended to escalate the situation I request that the ban be reconsidered.

this is completely unrealistic @DopeAsRoe there will NEVER be a woman as a captain unless its one of them fake ones

twice, i was too focused on his sister and that handsome fuck Joe Barbaro

Vitos eyes are like extremely bright blue, Have you not played mafia 2

Hm............. not sure... +1 though if kai & marcie rate them.

Ah yes, the "Rizzem with the Tism". My bad sir. Proceed.

im very expressive

are you often captivated by other mens eyes? i have never noticed vitos eyes

this is why you are the governor!!!!

Boat house would be a cool rentable building, because the other townhouses are usually full the bar would definitely be bought by a cool wop faction please consider boss

Maybe its not vito buddy

Why are you screaming

Real aggressive huh

There was no powergame by police here, no grand conspiracy or staff shenanigans, you simply squatted in a property you could not own. Cops investigated it as it was still seized, found you, you opened fire immediately and died. If it was a clientside, because you had 700 pings or whatever this is still a PK, we don't unpk for clientside issues. Further, the images you submitted to try to claim it was a clientside issue were very clearly edited and you could not provide solid evidence besides the single altered freezeframe. You also tried to pass off a picture of Townhouse 3 that you only purchased after dying, as the one you died from. ( You died at Townhouse 4 ). Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.

Stop engaging in the eyes fag

Vito doesnt have brown eyes, The eyes on the model are almost crosseyed and also brown. Vito has blue eyes