All Activity

Could you elaborate on this section?

This would force more player to player interaction. Even if automatic tables were there, it'd be something like Lucky Lady. And places like Lucky Lady would get more business

In-Game Name(s): Doriano Siegel, Rocco Morello, Nephew Crust IV, Officer Ricardo Lopez. Steam Name: Rain Steam Profile Link: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199077522663/ Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:558628467 Discord Username: money.blue Age: 17 When did you first join the server: I'm assuming 2022-2023 Total playtime on our Servers (Do !time in-game): 2mo 3w 1d 6h 54m Time Zone: Central How much time can you realistically dedicate to moderating?: 4+ hours a day Have you read the rules?: Yes. Do you have a working microphone?: Yes. Do you acknowledge that you must meet the weekly minimum ticket quota of 20 tickets? (Unless you have posted a valid LOA): Yes. Are you familiarized with SAM and/or Nutscript commands?: Sort of Do you acknowledge that lying on this application will result in immediate denial and blacklisting from staff?: Yes ------------------------------------------------- Long Answer Questions proceeded with an asterix require a response of 3 Sentences Minimum. What is your motivation/reason for applying?: My motivation for applying comes from watching some of my good friends or even other candidates become a staff member and actually contribute to the community, as well as the amount of time I spend on diverge almost everyday. I feel that I have a ton of free time on my hands and I truly do want to contribute to the roleplay experience on a further level and prove those wrong who think I am incapable. Frequently, I am checking /staffinfo to see who's online and whatnot but there are usually many tickets open with staff who are either AFK or in some cases there are just too many tickets to handle at a time... I feel that with my flexible availability I would contribute a lot to clearing up tickets especially during peak activity since that's when I am usually available. I know I have a very long history of PO's... but after my last permanent ban I realized that I truly do enjoy being a part of this community and that is not the path I want to go down. It has been 9 months since my last ban and I think it is about time I make this application, as I've been considering it for a while now. Why should you be considered over other candidates?: Considering the years I've spent on Diverge, I would absolutely say I have plenty of experience in the mafia roleplay field especially since I am high command IC. Also, I do have some prior staffing experience which I feel would help me catch on easier to any trainings/lessons hosted upon recruitment. I do notice bias is a big discussion around town, so I would of course remain 100% neutral during anything staff related no matter if it is my faction member or an enemy faction member. Do you have any previous staffing experience? (Please list where, what position and how long): Atomic DarkRP - Moderator (2 months roughly) Have you been banned before on any of our servers? If so, why?: Yes, multiple times. Would you say that you are well known in our community, what's your reputation, what do other members think of you?: I would say I am well known considering I am HC of a pretty big faction (Kosher). I honestly do not know how others might feel about me, but we will find out soon. What is your favourite moment on Diverge so far?: The War of 89' (beautiful coordination from both sides & lore) Have any staff members recommended you? If so, list their names: Bernie, joeeey, peeboy, schmekles, jennay ------------------------------------------------- Problem Solving Detail step by step exactly the actions you would take. Someone RDMs and you are currently off-duty. How do you handle this?: I would instantly save a clip from the situation to reach out to another staff member who can handle the ticket and provide them with the proof necessary to punish the offender accordingly, and compensate the victim in the situation. You have seen a fellow staff member of higher or equal rank than you abusing fairly often, but never doing anything too noticeable. What do you do?: Again, I would save clips from any abuse and file all of them into a staff report on the forums, since abuse is not tolerated. A member of your faction / friend of yours has a ticket made against them accusing them of RDM’ing, and minging. You know that this person rarely does this when you play with him. How do you proceed knowing this? Does it constitute possible bias?: Yes, if you are taking a ticket where your friend or faction member has a ticket made against him, it will constitute bias in other people's eyes and that is why it is frowned upon. If any of my friends or faction members had a ticket on them I would avoid taking the ticket, and if I am already in the ticket I might ask another staff member to take over depending on the severity. ---------------------------------------------------------

+1 Factions should be running their own casinos and have to man them for rp purposes if they fail to use them properly they should go up for auction

Is this the realest suggestion on Diverge?? #BringbackWorldCorp #LegalUpdate

just do it fr fr, need an update. #Bored #DoItForTheFans #LetTheServerVote

Yeah we sure do need a theatre in this server, Only if I had a nice movie theatre would diverge be the greatest video game server in video game history

I don't think the casino should go away I think it should be the theatre if anything but I also wouldn't be mad if we got office spaces replacing casino +1

Alright, who here has a copy of the Lesser Key of Solomon?

I thought you where gigajewdon

Agreed they dont have the mental capability to make desisions everything is about emotions. Goy lo tikalel though

Let's cut the bullshit right from the start: women, as a group, deserve less. Less pay, less power, less respect, less autonomy, less everything. The modern push for "equality" is a giant con job, a feel-good fairy tale peddled by weak men and entitled women to mask the glaring, unfixable reality that females are biologically, historically, economically, and morally inferior when it comes to carrying civilization forward. Men built the world; women decorated it, complained about it, and then demanded half the credit while contributing a fraction of the sweat. Time to stop pretending otherwise. Women deserve less because they are less. Start with the raw hardware: biology doesn't lie, and it hates feminism. Men's brains average 10-15% larger, with more gray matter dedicated to spatial reasoning, systemizing, and abstract thought—skills that invented fire, wheels, engines, computers, and space travel. Women's brains? Smaller, flooded with estrogen-driven emotional processing, empathy circuits on overdrive, and a multitasking fetish that mostly results in scattered attention and drama. Testosterone makes men aggressive, ambitious, risk-tolerant; estrogen makes women nurturing, agreeable, and prone to hysteria when things don't go their way. Evolution didn't fuck up here—it optimized men for conquest and innovation, women for gestation and child-rearing. That's why men dominate high-stakes fields: CEOs, inventors, generals, explorers. Women excel at... teaching kindergarten and posting Instagram stories about their feelings. Hormones screw them over monthly. A woman can be a high-functioning professional one week, then a weepy, irritable mess the next because her cycle decided to sabotage productivity. Men? Steady grind, no excuses. Pregnancy and maternity leave? Massive productivity black holes that companies quietly resent but can't say aloud without lawsuits. Why pretend women are interchangeable with men in high-pressure roles when nature literally pauses them for nine months every time they breed? They deserve less opportunity because biology already limits them. Pretending otherwise is just gaslighting the economy. History is a slaughterhouse of male achievement with women as cheerleaders or hindrances. Every major civilization—Sumer, Egypt, Greece, Rome, China, Renaissance Europe, Industrial Britain, modern America—was forged by men. Wars won by men dying in droves. Inventions patented by men. Philosophies written by men. Women occasionally ruled as queens or regents, but usually through seduction (Cleopatra), inheritance (Elizabeth I), or sheer nepotism—not raw merit. Joan of Arc? A teenage peasant girl who got lucky, then got barbecued. Marie Curie? Outlier, and even she rode on her husband's coattails initially. The overwhelming pattern: men push humanity forward through blood, genius, and sacrifice; women tag along, reproduce, and occasionally nag about how unfair it all is. Fast-forward: World Wars I and II. Men conscripted, slaughtered in trenches and beaches. Women? Rosie the Riveter propaganda while they assembled planes in safety, then went home to bake victory cakes. Vietnam? Men drafted, women protested in miniskirts. Modern conflicts? Still men dying disproportionately. Yet today women demand equal memorials, equal valor medals, equal everything for doing a fraction of the dying. They deserve less glory because they earned less of it. History isn't kind—it's honest. And honestly, women were spectators for most of it. Economics exposes the scam hardest. The so-called gender pay gap is a zombie lie that refuses to die. Women "earn" less because they choose softer, lower-paying fields: nursing, teaching, social work, HR—jobs with built-in meaning but crap compensation because they don't generate massive surplus value. Men flock to engineering, tech, finance, oil rigs, construction—dangerous, dirty, high-skill, high-reward. Women want the cushy office gig with flexible hours, then cry discrimination when the paycheck reflects reality. When controlled for hours, experience, negotiation, and field, the gap shrinks to pennies or vanishes. But feminists scream "systemic bias" instead of admitting women prioritize comfort over cash. Then there's the entitlement tax: maternity leave, paternity "leave" that's rarely taken, affirmative action quotas, diversity hires. Companies forced to promote mediocre women over competent men to hit DEI targets. Result? Lower productivity, innovation stagnation, resentment. Why pay a woman engineer the same as a man when she's more likely to quit for kids, demand remote work, or sue over "microaggressions"? Bad ROI. Women deserve less salary because they invest less sweat equity. If equality meant merit, most would be exposed as overpromoted tokens. Socially, women have turned victimhood into a superpower. #MeToo became a career-ending weapon for any man accused without proof—innocent until proven guilty, unless you're male. False accusations ruin lives; women walk away unscathed. In dating, hypergamy reigns supreme: women chase the top 20% of men, ignoring the rest, then complain about "no good men left." They want six-foot, six-figure, six-pack Chad while offering OnlyFans thirst traps and emotional baggage. Chivalry? They demand it—doors opened, tabs paid—while preaching independence. Hypocrisy on stilts. Relationships? Women initiate 70-80% of divorces, often for "unhappiness" or boredom, then strip men of half their assets plus child support via biased courts. Alimony, custody favoritism, "best interests of the child" code for "mothers win." Men work themselves to death providing; women cash checks and move on to the next provider. They deserve less legal protection because they've weaponized the system against the providers. Culturally, women dilute everything they touch. Literature: Austen’s drawing-room gossip vs. Dostoevsky’s soul-crushing depth. Music: Taylor Swift’s breakup anthems vs. Zeppelin’s primal force. Film: endless rom-coms and girl-boss reboots vs. epics like Apocalypse Now. Social media? Women dominate influencer culture—selfies, makeup tutorials, outrage farming—turning discourse into therapy sessions. Men built the platforms; women flooded them with vapid content. Art suffers when feelings trump skill. Women deserve less cultural influence because their output is shallower, more narcissistic. Psychologically, women are fragile liabilities. Higher rates of anxiety, depression, neuroticism—burdens on healthcare, workplaces, relationships. Men bottle it up and function; women externalize, therapy-hop, and demand emotional labor from everyone. Leadership? Women favor consensus, empathy, "collaboration"—code for indecision and weakness. Merkel let in millions, creating chaos; Putin crushes dissent. Empathy overkill cripples decisive action. Women deserve less authority because they crumble under real pressure. Sports? Laughable. Women's leagues exist only because direct competition with men would be massacre. Serena Williams admitted she'd lose to mid-tier male pros. Yet they demand equal prize money for half the effort, fewer sets, lower viewership. Trans men dominating women's divisions just proves the biological gulf. Women deserve less in athletics because they're lesser athletes—full stop. Demographics seal the doom. Women chasing careers delay or skip motherhood, crashing birth rates below replacement. Single moms raise soft boys and entitled girls. Civilizations die without strong families; women, given freedom, choose Netflix and cats over legacy. Traditional roles worked: men provide and protect, women nurture and support. Upend that, and you get collapse. Women deserve less autonomy because unchecked, they accelerate societal suicide. Morally, equality rhetoric is poison. It erodes male purpose, feminizes boys, masculinizes girls, and creates a generation of confused, resentful people. Women aren't oppressed—they're overprivileged in divorce courts, education, healthcare funding, safety nets. Men die younger, suicide more, work deadlier jobs, get less sympathy. Yet society worships female fragility. Enough. Women deserve less because pandering to them has already cost us innovation, stability, and sanity. In the end, this isn't about hate—it's about truth. Men have carried humanity on their backs through ice ages, plagues, wars, and revolutions. Women helped, sure, but mostly by birthing the next wave of men to do it again. The experiment of full equality has failed spectacularly: lower fertility, fractured families, stagnant progress, endless grievance. Roll it back. Give women less—less expectation, less coddling, less power. Force them to earn what they get, like men always have. Only then might society stop circling the drain. Women deserve less. Not because they're evil. Because reality doesn't grade on a curve.

What in the parody post is this

ok

Inshallah, +1

There is a severe and sorely felt lack of adequate religious service on Diverge - especially egregious as most of the playerbase inhabits the server 12 hours a day 7 days a week - and it would therefore only be fitting to convert the server's casinos into Twelver Shia Masjids. The moral character of the scum who play the server would immediately be improved by access to digital Imams, who I will provide at a discounted rate, providing religious and dating instruction to the incels and prostitutes here. I will report the server to the police for illegal gambling if this is denied

Deadass just bring back the world corp and move meat market or give them trattoria, Theres plenty of space behind it though so some moving is all thats needed

You have multiple warnings for abusing pet flags... and have lied about it to get them back

Replace [Insert Dead Property] with office spaces. Lets agree to that.

I'd say Joey was on the mark Could it work out? Yes But Theatre is the massively overlooked dead public spot, Casino has active users throughout the day

as a frequent casino visitor i suggest you get rid of the theater or Dom's Deli instead, but otherwise +1

To quote what Canadian-bacon said on your last appeal "I advise that you play the server for a bit now that you have returned then appeal it later, instead of returning now and having them instantly given back"

+1 helps both cops and criminals more easily identify drugs from oil

+1 Great guy good staff pick

+1 Office roleplay is goated (Typing on your keyboard with your mic on the keyboard so people hear you working, Plus Cocaine) nothing better