Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/06/26 in Posts
-
It would be a cool feature to have a actual "illegal" gambling racket yes you have blackjack in the casinos but in the sopranos and other mob media such as "gotti" or "goodfellas" you see backroom cardgames where they are actually playing cards. To have a actual table where you can actually play cards instead of just hitting 2 buttons, think of red dead 1's mechanics with poker. would make illegal gambling operations an actual problem for cops to deal with and it would be cool to have backroom games where players can actually participate in the card game instead of using a URL to simulate the experience. I have seen addon's such as what I'm describing on the workshop which could work with diverges current add-on list. Any questions to how this could actually be used or any disagreements you have let me know in the reply's and i can go further in detail on the suggestion5 points
-
+1 solid suggestion, RDR1 being the example is what i like the most, it would be the best system to add into diverge one because of simplicity and two because i don't wanna play URL links, its boring and not worth buying in 50k. This is a great suggestion and definitely should be implemented into the city.2 points
-
2 points
-
Your Character or Steam Name Diomedes "El Gavilan Mayor" Quintana Your SteamID 76561199093291148 Your Discord ID# jv45034 Reason for Ban Powergaming Length of Ban 1 Week Reason for Appeal Wish to come back. Why should you be unbanned? I am sorry for throwing a body part inside Palermo. I did not know that doing so be Powergame. I just wanted to play a joke, I like playing on Diverge and would not like to be restricted from playing the server over a silly mistake done with no ill faith. I kindly ask a reduction from 1 week to a couple of days or how the administrators see fit. Additional Information: None.1 point
-
Name of Character: Lev Dragovich Character ID: 203331 SteamID: STEAM_0:0:158162795 Your Discord ID#: 276024386304344075 Date of PK: 10/6/1990 Reason for PK: Shooting at a cop after he shot me. Why should you be unPK'd? What server rule or PK rule was violated?: First of all two cops shot at my car and i reacted by going all the way from the back to the front to shoot at them again because im an active threat for no reason but since they shot me they made me an active threat, so my friend swam away and i went back to shoot them. The UA can even check logs and see in a span of 2 minutes i went back and shot the cops that shot me for no reason. I will provide two short clips showing and summarizing everything. So in the first clip slow it down to a 0.5 speed and see two guns where fired at me for no reason, and also you can check logs we didnt run any officers down so that they a reason to shoot at us or anything. Because in the rules it states, Officers may not execute suspects, they must make an effort to arrest a suspect when possible render aid to a bleeding suspect. You can't kill someone if they are no longer an active threat between a reasonable pause. Thats when i went to hide to ambush them and in the second clip it shows they were waiting for us near apps to ambush us. general rules - killing rules 6: You may kill in self defence or in defence of your partners/faction/property (Must have F3). When you've been attacked by an aggressor and survive (you did not aggravate or bait them to hit you) you may return with a weapon to kill them. You may not kill someone or escalate a confrontation to murder just for verbal disrespect/argument. -However if someone continues to disrespect you, you may physically intimidate or hit them. (Fists, melee weapon) As continued disrespect could realistically start a fight. The user then has free choice on how to respond/retaliate. If they choose to flee you may not kill them. a. If the user is attacked they may flee and return later (5 minutes maximum) to exact revenge on the assailants as described under killing rule 6. b. If the user is subject to an active threat via knife or gunpoint they can choose to retaliate or instead leave peacefully. However they may not return later to attack them without sufficient reason as the previous situation had already ended. 1A shows that i can shoot back but i have up to 5minutes and i went back to shoot in literally 2 minutes and logs can vouch for what im saying. If possible please provide video evidence or photo evidence if PK does not follow the guidelines: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nFlTNBHzRI2cFm0pN?invite=cr-MSxsQTEsMjAxODI5NTQy https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nFlUqd93BOssY-8ce?invite=cr-MSxCOFAsMjAxODI5NTQy1 point
-
Ardm is an IC issue RDM is what we punish but if it's ARDM it can be dealt with in many IC ways Have a good night1 point
-
1 point
-
-1, lying in your appeal isn't slick or a good look. This is not an isolated incident; they were in a VC while threatening to PK me for using the bathroom IRL during a gun deal. (I could hear their friend in their mic) Thought this was permanent. Woops.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Bring back parents beating their children so we don’t get stuff like this anymore1 point
-
if you right click a ring you have equipped you can press equip again and it insta fixes it1 point
-
aye, would be intresting to watch this one... but it was a good discussion with you gr1mmy... P.S so "attempted" rdm is ok? ;D0 points
-
an rdm is not an IC issue, a cop breaking the rule of not giving enough time to respond is also not an IC issue... the cop breaking protocol if thats what you mean, i agree with you... but RDM is also against the rules... thus, not ICly... (could ALSO be dealt with ICly but does not have to be... otherwise EVERY rdm can be dealt with ICly but not OOCly...) the car, he "fled"... you admitted it and admitted the UA used that wording too. are we honestly not allowed to get cover and HAVE to jump out at that spot getting run over 50 fucking times BEFORE i can shoot the cop who's already spam tazed me and arrested me? yea, its THAT spot... outside BL where everyone speed races that stretch lol since it was still within the 5 mins, a cop doing lethal force first can not lead to a PK if defending oneself. tupac also said he aint paying shit for this one lol0 points
-
The cop shooting him was RDM But him returning and Rdming the cop who wasn't trying to arrest anyone and simply walking down the street at that time caused me to not warn either party as both were in the wrong. At the end of the day if a cop shoots you it's an IC Issue. But you can Actively Respond to it in an Active Situation On that note He cannot shoot from the drivers seat but if he got out of the car whilst being shot at or at the bottom of the road and THEN Returned fire. Wouldn't have been a PK. And on that topic walking up to three officers and Gunning one down isn't really "Valuing" One's life when there's two other armed officers next to him0 points
-
Hey gr1mmy, first thing first, you be right and sorry on my behalf about it... but secondly, he cant exactly shoot from the driver seat can he? people be talking about hopping out the car to shoot but in all fairness these people probs shoot glocks in a firing range sideways and wonder why they cant hit shit but concrete... let alone cover since they be walking tanks on steroids whom bullets can not kill because milenial plot armour... the rule states it written down... he fled... its even in laws... to "flee" in a car is a felony resisting otherwise your words here of him "not flee'ing but leaving peacefully" would affect the laws too, would they not? ""When we'd finally come to a decision we noticed a member of UA Was available and also requested his input on the topic. Where 4Lights agreed with me that you'd Left the situation. Fled the area and that interaction was over."" you also said it yourself... "fled"... he didnt do it at 4 mins or 6 mins thus pushing the boundries... he done it within 2 mins... didnt die between then and now the situation of killing the cop, the cop didnt die, they was waiting around to see.... otherwise im allowed to do this too if i became a cop? you setting a bad standard for when another cop just shoots and hits a person "but its not rdm its just you "fled" but not really you left the situation despite bleeding on the dash of the car and still hurt from the bullet..." he was still hurt from the bullet... it didnt "undo" because he fled... this is a typical scene of so many accidental rdms and even a standard about the cop doing lethal action FIRST... the only disagreement is "ohh you fled so its ended" when in the rules it states you are allowed to return within 5 mins with a weapon.... it was not tupac's fault nor choice that the cop decided to shoot straight after an order and randomly hit people he did not intend to shoot... otherwise aint that also not giving enough time to obey an order? 5 seconds right? hell.... Aint that rdm or at the very least a reason to shoot the person within the timelimit? if not remove all our PO's for accidental crossfire please and while you're at it please remove felonies for evading police in cars since its not "flee'ing"... i like that standard actually... on all the games iv played, iv not seen as much flip-flopping of the rules to help out friends and the like as much as this...0 points
-
The violent confrontation with police is its own rule aswell. Since the situation was more than over and u went and blicky'd that nigga i think its fair to say you initiated a new confrontation there. DONT YOU EVER DUMB REACT ME AGAIN PIPSQUEAK-1 points
-
wallahi, he could have got out that car and shot back when he actually got shot, returning minutes later when the situation is gone and the cop didnt even know who he was to kill him was silly on his part. im not even involved in this, i just had to educate this fool. cop baiting has a price when u miss ur shots-1 points
-
-1 points