Hi, I was the guy who had a meeting with you for a fued that we're having, and you shot us.
I did in fact threaten to have you mugged, that's true. Nobody pointed guns, this was the usual spat, threats not backed up by nothing in the moment happening.
The problem is, is that according to you:
This was about us not leaving the property. The entire sit was about that. This, "He threatened to have me mugged" thing is just you reaching for anything at this point.
The meeting went poorly, obviously. You asked us to leave, 3 times. The guns that were "Out" were on safety. Escalation was not reached to gunfights.
When we left, we left with our backs turned, and you gunned us down leaving. Which is what we did. Which is what you shot us while we were doing.
I've laid out the proper escalation for you
1. Guy threatens you or is mean or whatever
2. You pull out a gun, point it at them, give them a command to leave
3. You give them ample time to respond
4. If they're not doing the thing, you shoot them. Or if they pull a gun out, you shoot them.
5. Either they do it, or you get into a gunfight and see who's the better shooter
You failed at part 2, pointing the gun and giving a command to leave
You also failed at part 4, "If they're not doing the thing"; as when you shot us, we were doing the thing.
It's not "Don't pull a gun, because (as you said in the sit) i'm scared they'll shoot us. and then like, shoot them when their backs are turned. because i'm a coward or whatever."
Please review the difference between an "Active threat" and an "Inactive threat", as dictated by the rules.
I find it highly laughable that, during our sitdown, you spouted off that "We can't threaten you, or extort you, because there's not an escalation ticket open".
We can, in an opportunity to avoid escalation. But then, you yourself would fail to actually know the rules a second time by shooting us as we were doing what you asked. Albeit late.