Lucid Mangos

+1 seen this guys rp and is very good at staying in character, would love to see him added to help the community.

+1 agree too easy to allow for racket abuse and faction abuse as well.

Hey, admin that handled the ticket to have char PKd. Not quite sure what exactly you were doing inside of the ghetto room, but ultimately the cops were attempting to gain access to your domicile. When you opened up they wanted to detain you, they had guns drawn on you and before they could switch to taze you you pulled out your bat and started swinging at the cop in front of you. You were simply PKd because you failed to take your life in a realistic manner and broke FearRP when confronted by 2 cops. As I told you in the sit, PD trying to breach your home, afaik you said it was illegal, whether that was the case or not you could have taken that to court and RPd that out. Instead you risked your life and paid the price.

I didnt see this till just now, there have been changes to what classifies low level associates that can just leave. If they're not well in depth with the criminal life style theyre basically free to leave with a few technicalities. the rule says; "If they have left the gang/family without approval from the leader, while holding the position of made man+ (or appropriate equivalent), they may be subject to a PK. Entry level associates who are not made or deeply committed to the organization may leave without harm as their position is low and they know very little. (Security, waiters, doormen, drivers, etc) <You will be asked to provide evidence of rank> This does not apply if they have partaken in felony criminal actions, drug manufacturing/murder/robbery/etc that are directly related to your faction. (However these actions must be verified). Generally under most don's orders."

Ah damn my bad thanks for finding it though, now we wait to see what the higher ups have to say.

Real shit, why wouldnt they just let anyone that says hey my friends play and recently Ive wanted to play, look I even made a cake to show I wanna play! If we let anyone who did that back in then we'd just be letting in a bunch of idiots we dont want back in. Read the rules: https://divergenet.works/forum/8-rules/ Then fill out this quiz and post your results: https://divergenet.works/forum/8-rules/ Maybe then someone higher will see that as a sign of you wanting to come back and actually engage in an actual RP manner

For larger payouts, you pay idk something like 3k you receive a voucher try to sign it, bring it in with a shipment when sold itll give you the 3k you spent and 2k from signing. Along with if you fuck up the signing the person behind using the NPC is alerted to try and stall the person, or maybe it just says its faulty and its up to them whether they wanna press charges against the person and call the cops.

Cars are already a problem, now you want people to have the ability to shoot from cars!? I dont think this would add much of anything to the server.

4Lights summed up the situation pretty well, we have been told to grant leniency because this is an event and people are likely to get a bit overwhelmed in pressure and make mistakes. However, the conclusion I came to before 4lights came into the sit for another situation, was to give you a note and explain that Askull in this situation did not have enough time to react, when you hopped in support vc with 4Lights I joined and watched as well. Even in your clip it doesn't help, you command him to run when he gets out of the car he runs towards city hall, and so does your group. Not at any point does he pull out his gun, and again because you were warned 2 hours prior for RDM the conclusion we came to was that you had been granted leniency prior and then did it again. A run down of the events that unfolded, you hop the fence, Shout a bunch of times, Askull gets out of his car, Askull runs towards city hall you and your guys follow (not chasing him just after he flees towards city hall). As he's making his way towards the ATM he sees one yell in his clip (I'm assuming he maybe saw 1 or 2 at his car), turns around and is shot. I hope I summed that up well enough to explain my perspective.

Choose your favorite staff, had to section these off as I can only add 20 at a time for each question. Since the last time I made a poll for this same thing there has been a large influx of new members to vote on. Curiosity got the best of me so Im back with another poll. Please answer honestly. Remember this is just for fun and doesnt mean much. EDIT: Disclaimer: At shittors request

Having known Mr unsatisfied for some time now, I find she is quite different from others not a simple + or - 1 would suffice. I think she may be kind enough and well off to be able to help with minimal shit like whitelistes and people getting stuck. But I'm worried about any RDM/VDM/FailRp tickets. I'm afraid she may get too involved with the dialogue and ban offenders regardless of their history or regardless of what actually happened. I feel like if she can prove that she can handle the morons that broke a rule and use the time to harass her with slander then I could see her as fit. But from what I've seen personally I don't think she's ready yet. If your reading this Ms Unsatisfied this is not a swing at you just some criticism.

Real.

Not the banning admin, but the admin who did ban could not perma ban, they just dont have the ability to do so they would have to request an extension. The ban was not extended manually by a higher up from the looks of it. So to get to the point, you must have Metagamed, Powergamed, and RDM'd, which then the sit likely happened after you had gotten off which wouldve left you with an LTAP but its not listed, so occams razor says that you likely logged off, got banned then wanted to play on another char on your other account and got banned automatically by console for ban evasion. ALTing is allowed we just obviously dont want people alting when their on a ban. - CONSOLE Length: Permanent Reason for ban: Alt Account of: STEAM_0:0:188492965 having had a look at your notes and bans on both accounts seems pretty rough, no notes on your account you posted for but POs of some pretty insidious stuff, the other account has 10 notes and 4 bans and then the automatic perma ban. I implore you to really think about this situation that lead to your last ban. I dont think someone with your extensive POs would just not know why you were banned, or how you broke the rules.

Of your supposed 700 hrs you were banned for 168 hrs, thats 24% of your playtime. Thats not even to mention the hours in between each perma that you added, which would probably lower the percent of ban to play time. My whole point that I was trying to get across, is that people do dumb shit and get in trouble for it, no problem, some people really just get themselves caught up in dumb shit and really just want a quick rush of euphoria I get it. But when your a repeat offender and continue to appeal and are given a chance time and time again, those words become less and less meaningful. My suggestion to you is to really actually sit and think about Canadian's question and be real about it. Your already perma banned so there isnt any point in trying to hide shit or sit behind a soft apology. Just full send it, you want back in right? if so just be real with yourself and be straight about it no dodging or saying what you think Canadian wants to hear. Just answer Canadians question sincerely:

Agreed, I dont think that a quick swap needs to be instantaneous. It just needs to improve the quality of life, literally Rust is the best example I can think of sure you can quick move a lot of items but each one has their own delayed moved when you hit the bind. I think if we had something like that where we could double click an item it does a small delay for each item double clicked then it moves. So in practice itd be like I double click one item then another and then another and each one has their own respective time delay to be moved. That way it doesnt feel too quick and un-immersive. I think I saw another post about this same idea, I have a feeling that its not that they dont want to do it but rather requires a lot of coding and could be too much to implement. But hopefully this gets implemented.