KingJewMonaclu

This falls under quite a niche spot in the rules, as a result many staff members were confused given the validity of the PK. You were pk'ed following this rule: ■ Breaking Fear RP while being detained by Police. If the police are detaining you for a crime and you break FEAR rp by pulling a weapon on them the NYPD are still within their right to react in self defense. This can and will be considered initiating a violent confrontation with police EVEN if you never managed to fire the weapon. Which can have possibly caused some misconnections or confusions. We know in this situation you did not initiate violence on the officer (You never attempted to shoot), you were not under fear RP nor were you being detained, as well as having put the gun away. While the cop is not faulted for having shot you, it should not have been a PK. We apologize for the inconvenience, that being said you need to be mindful when pulling a weapon out.

The rules surrounding a cop initiating the gun fight invalidating the pk only apply to the person to which the officer shoots, as long as they have not broken fear RP or initiated a shootout with the officer first. An example would be: A man is running away from police. Police officer opens fire on him. He is now free to retaliate against that officer without the risk of PK. However; in this case the officer had a valid reason to shoot your friend, and you are to begin with not your friend. This protection does not apply to you. You saw your friend get shot by a cop, and you shot at the cop and lost. This is a valid PK, you should not shoot at cops who have not shot at you. The PK rule in question: Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.

Free curtis (No seriously, he's clawing)

Bro said rdm ain't good enough, he wants to rdm they wallet too

bro got clowned on and is salty

Hello all, Let me break this down for you, because this was discussed in depth between the Senior Administration team and the UA team, and we've come to a ruling regarding this. The problem at the base of this pk, despite all the dribble that's been talked about, is the orders that were given. The orders that were given, were invalid. Being a "Burden" is not a pk order. Leaving the family is invalid because he never left the family. So, this is a cleanup. You guys are trying to find a valid reason after the fact, and we've decided to make a decision regarding this kind of conduct. If you give dons orders on someone, and the reason is invalid, but you totally have a good reason to do it, and you neglected to actually give that as the reason, the dons orders will be overturned. As is in this case. Obviously there was some schizo posting about this guy wanting to leave and steal some funds, or something of the like, and that wasn't mentioned in the orders at all. Obviously there was some talk about the potential of him retiring, whether or not it was a rumour, which could have been used as a reason, but it wasn't actually mentioned. The orders given to the staff indicated that he had left the faction; he didn't. He was kicked out of the discord. The orders given to the staff indicated that he was a "Burden", with no further explanation, and it's not even really explained here in the post cleanup. At the end of the day, the staff member accepting this PK, should have NOT have accepted this PK. As a result of the failures of the don/HC that gave the orders, and the failure of the staff member to properly verify the information regarding the leaving the faction, and the invalidity of "being a burden", this PK will be overturned. With that, there are some strict parameters to be played by on part of both parties in this situation. Firstly, all knowledge of the Gambino Crime Family that Luca has is hereby completely voided. Likewise, the knowledge the family has about Luca is completely voided. Any attempts to regain anything from Luca, i.e. money or items, without NEW proper cause (post date this pk, if he actually wrongs the faction and the faction wishes to retaliate, which will require documentation). will be met with staff disciplinary action. If Luca attempts to snitch, or beef without NEW (post date this pk, if the faction actually wrongs him and he wishes to retaliate, which will require documentation) and proper cause with the faction, it will be met with the same staff disciplinary action. Let it be known for future orders that this rule will always apply, if you give invalid orders the pk will be overturned. No matter how good of a reason you figure out before or after. It is YOUR responsibility to give proper orders. It is YOUR responsibility as a don to ensure that your people are giving proper orders. They should be specific and concise. Leave no room for ambiguity. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Accidentally running over a cop and immediately stopping and saying you didnt see him is not a PK. He was no longer an active threat at the time that he tried to drive away again. This is far too loose.

A lot of people lock their doors i've noticed, and I think it would be a really cool addition to the server if you could somehow unlock a door that you yourself dont have keys to. Like picking the locks. Maybe some kind of lock unlocker, we'd have to think of some crazy name for it. Maybe we could even add weed farms, so that people who want to break in have something to obtain and it makes it worth it. let me know what u think

full pop 60-90, low pop 120-150

Your appeal has been reviewed and accepted. Your character has been reinstated and can be used again.

your jaybo brown is unpked now

Houseboat is a curse for factions.

My honest reaction

"It's not a bug, its a feature!" lets just do it lol

If you're broke just say that