KingJewMonaclu

Hello, this PK has been the foundation for some controversy it would seem. Here is the ruling: You were sitting idly in a car, and when 2 cops and their suspect who they were tazing lined up perfectly, you sped forward, hitting the officers, ragdolling them underneat your car, and the obvious result was your death. Now some may say that "gmod physics" shouldn't be applicable to PKs, however anybody who's played this game further than 5 minutes understands that hitting people with your car who are on foot will invariably kill you as well. You performed a violent action against officers, and died. Had you drowned, this would be a PK. Had you starved to death, this would have been a PK. Any death after starting a violent confrontation with police, is a full death, save actual server glitches (dying from running people over not applicable) or RDM. To speak on the aspect of the reporting player not being an officer; it's an indifferent aspect of this. Any death that is a PK can be reported by any player, officer, bystander, or guy who does it for the love of the game for some reason. A PK is a PK no matter who reports it. There is no selective PKs. If there's evidence, and its valid, it is a PK. This is a denial, the PK is just.

officers cannot remove the masks of cuffed people? what are you talking about?

No evidence provided of finding you again after the mugging occurred, and successful identification. Also learn to spell. Your appeal has been reviewed and accepted. Your character has been reinstated and can be used again.

You stood accused of "Gambling", when directed not to be a gambling addict. This is a valid kill reason.

curtis would agree

im going back on all 6 characters and rocking your shit

-1000 control your people

Lawyer guy here

bro wants so bad to make rope art of tits again

Explain the rainbow pfp. Are you a homosexual?

idea #420: blackjack tournament. every faction can put up to 1 mil to gamble, select gamblers, and highest take home wins

yeah thats a whole lot of yap on the basis of semantics, but i'd look at the greater point of how you semantically got shot in the face for stealing someones business idea

Hello, you very outwardly stole a guys idea after he pitched it to you, you being a lawyer he wanted to use. While the initial confrontation started through DMs, it was DMs that you obviously entertained and discussed things with him, and subsequently stole his idea, so we allowed for it to be used, considering you then took that information IC to steal the business idea out from underneath him. Furthermore, you failed to stop attempting to operate this business after an IC threat was made on your life, albeit after you char abused first because you're a coward. After your ban was up, you continued to attempt to operate, which was documented by the parties that had threatened you, and the evidence was given to us, which allowed for your pk to be greenlit. This was a decision based on an RP conscious conclusion of what would happen if a civilian stole a business from a mafia, which would obviously cause monetary harm, as they were losing out on the profits from said business. A normal, regular civilian wouldn't dare to steal a business from a mafioso in mafia town. But you did, so you got threatened, and subsequently PKed when you continued.