All Activity
- Past hour
-
https://medal.tv/games/screen-capture/clips/nkntXbh5GRzrrZJmd?invite=cr-MSxKUzgsMTk3ODk5MjU1 Dood has been targeting Kinahan guys ever since he got wacked. Free Diego; this shit was 100% targeted
-
both of the individuals involved both sent me this image (as i am breads streetboss) both of them are known to have mugging chars, metagaming, and being minges
-
Bread started following Diego Cruz PK Appeal
-
Name of Character: Diego "Darts" Cruz Character ID:205451 SteamID:STEAM_0:1:149036428 Your Discord ID#: itsbreadbuns Date of PK: 19/08/2026 Reason for PK: Mugging Why should you be unPK'd? What server rule or PK rule was violated?: Mugging Rules: Rule 22: Target mugging someone in an effort to specifically pk them (PK hunting) is not permitted. instance : Targeting them for OOC reasons or for events that occurred on a different character. (Meta/Powergame) - person was pk'd by our faction due to being found out of being a rat on 15/08/2026 ~05:10 BST If possible please provide video evidence or photo evidence if PK does not follow the guidelines: Evidence of Metagaming and targeting : Somehow knows my name : https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nm0kQ86rvSaJx485Y?invite=cr-MSw1c24sMjk1MjM2ODE Dead rat : https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nm0nJwAvg2FWWS2Xa?invite=cr-MSxvcmksMjk1MjM2ODE Context : player only knew me from his old character and was camping outside of the golden dragon after i have finished the transaction with the people that was working there (in the clip) i went to get a shipment across from the jewelry store which the same car and person (Red Helmet) pulled up and tried to follow me which i escaped that time (before the mugging went down)
-
Hi! Banning admin here, at this time and with the clip I was given, the situation was unclear as it was multiple hours later. From what I saw + your many RDM PO's it seemed to be blantent RDM. After reviewing this clip, im not so sure. All in all, a member of upper staff will take a look at this and determine the end result, but i appreciate you taking the time to submit this appeal and provide more context to the clip. Thanks, Ka1
-
Your Character or Steam Name: ASkull Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): STEAM_0:0:27926209 Your Discord ID#: .askull Reason for ban: RDM Length of ban:1 week Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Dispute Why should you be unbanned? This nigger been using props to push cars and move them trying to send them flying all night. If you check his logs you can see he spawns in the most random prop and he's been using them and rubbing against cars. Earlier he tried to sent my homie's car flying and then later that night he spawn in a prop and was trying to put it under my car and He was pushing cars earlier and so I thought he was pushing my car pretty reasonable. Additional Information (images, videos, etc): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nm05tdgcsU86BmO-p?invite=cr-MSxjWEcsNzkyNzY2ODY
- Today
-
Looking at the first interaction that was attached, it feels like there is prior context that is not included. Regardless of if that is the case, it seems like you were repeatedly trying to be a nuisance and return to the property knowing what the outcome would be each time. You also immediately fall into OOC terms and claims during the interaction, breaking any chance of actual RP. You were not providing any meaningful roleplay and claim you intended on returning to shoot up the place as a result of the players trespassing you from their property, which they are within their right to do, especially when you are acting as you were. Given this ban has expired, it does not mean much, but in future I hope you will keep things IC and more correctly follow the rules. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.
-
Reviewing the clip and getting some opinions from other staff members, I don't really see this as RDM or Fail Escalation. Your factions are having minor issues with one another, and are actively handling/participating in them through sit-downs and whatnot. Both sides have been causing ruckus at each others businesses, and arguing/being a nuisance. In this instance, after a verbal confrontation a punch is thrown, which leads one of the Russian guys to spray at least one guy down. Pulling a gun in retaliation seems pretty valid to me. Both factions are going tit for tat on minor fail escalations like graffiti and subtle RDM bait. This doesn't even address the metagame clip attached in this appeal. Overall, there are multiple small infractions happening on both sides of the fence here, but I believe this scenario would not constitute RDM, nor Fail Escalation, especially with the full scope of context considered. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be lifted from your account shortly. If it was deemed an invalid ban, it will also be removed from your record.
-
Beggin it
-
Disable using Trunk while inside the vehicle
Platocygnus replied to KingJewMonaclu's topic in Suggestions
When are we merging all trunks together it's been a year -
How much to keep him perm banned
-
You have 4 PO's for RDM before this one, all within a short time frame. This would definitely warrant a ban. The ban length was extended due to the baffling act of going back to your old characters corpse and burning it on your new character. I am unsure how your microphone plays into the detail of this ban, if you are having issues with it, that is for you to handle. I am sure there are guides online that will help. Hopefully whilst you serve this ban you can read up on the server rules as a whole, and continue enjoying the server within the bounds of the rules. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.
-
You admit to having done the initial rulebreak, which was enough to justify the PET blacklist but not necessarily a ban- but then you RDM in the sit, and leave the server, knowing full well the consequences, especially as ex-staff. You do not really dispute or apologize in this appeal. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.
-
Hi Considering the prior note only 4 days before the ban, for the exact same thing, I think it's fair to say you knew this was not acceptable behavior and as ex-staff you knew a second note so soon would result in a PET blacklist. You only have 1 prior prop related note (unless the carbombing one is also prop related, which would just further confirm the blacklist's validity) but there is also a clear uptick in notes in general within the last 4 weeks, which I think is also worth mention. Your flag appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this blacklist to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.
-
Cry more.
-
Hey man not cool I liked your video. (Big fan)
-
Christopher Battisanti PK Appeal for Unfair Player Kill
JJ_ replied to Micky2DEvito's topic in Denied
Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK. -
Christopher Battisanti PK Appeal for Unfair Player Kill
JJ_ replied to Micky2DEvito's topic in Denied
Hello, the clip of this PK is pretty clear. Two men came to your parked car and gave repeated orders saying “hop out the car hop out the car” while having guns drawn and pointed at the vehicle, until you sped away. The orders and the fear rp were clear. I do not see how you could view otherwise, maybe you just didn’t catch it being caught up in the moment. Regardless I see nothing wrong with how the muggers placed you under fear rp and the orders they gave you. -
Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.
-
JJ_ started following Mark Siegel Pk Appeal
-
Hello, it’s blatantly obvious that you initiated a violent encounter with the cop, something you are not disagreeing with yourself. What really matters for this appeal is the length of time between the initial incident and when you were killed. In my opinion, the length of time between the initial incident and the shooting is perfectly reasonable. Additionally, you very well could have been running into that back room to get a better angle to kill the officer. I strongly feel as if that any officer would have shot in that situation, nor do I think the officer waited too long to do so. I do not believe this takes anything away from the validity of this PK.
-
Christopher Battisanti PK Appeal for Unfair Player Kill
Medinator replied to Micky2DEvito's topic in Denied
As lazy as AI is and slop not really relevant as it still doesn’t invalidate if the PK was legit or not we shall see though -
-
I Personally saw Don Galicia Sergio Perez in city yesterday
-
Coco i thought we talked about this....