All Activity

The idea is good but It would most likely break the server in all forms, mainly fps bc we know thats alrdy fucked. But how tf am i supposed to sell Gas tax in a game Tow truck company would result in the removal of the car despawn timer which is used to decrease the amount of models and props around the city to boost fps.

The idea is there, its just how it would be done. For those who enter the program, UA or PD would make them change their name. For those who already have the snitches f3 - There must be a way to remove that when they go into the program. This brings alot of more snitchRP because those who snitch end up getting whacked anyways. This would allow them to have a second chance in a different mafia or go straight while still being hunted by their previous family.

I used to RP on Graal and this is how typed text shows on that game. I love the idea. It’s a big change but a positive one. Many scenarios nothing should show, obviously,( like ads/rumors and whispers) but otherwise… ace idea. (Edit: I specifically only mention Graal because it’s a 2D game and the text was rather “intrusive” in nature, as it obstructed the screen; yet it still worked very well. Seeing people’s text (and there was a cut off after a couple sentences) over their head was a gift. You could also change the font/size client-side. Plenty of 3D games I’ve RP’d on have this and it works perfectly fine. A preview shows up over the character’s head and you easily match it with the text box. It’s a no brainer.)

Bacon, if you want to prove identities with IP, I can literally show you by joining the server I have a diffent WAN IP than [LEGIT] Waffle, I no longer live at my family's house so this is easily provable for me. At the time of the ban I still lived at home with my family, I've been moved out for multiple years now, I find this to be a weak argument to justify my ban. And to be quite honest what's wrong with 3 people who are related to be playing on the same server in the same house? Is this somehow against the rules in Diverge Networks? My brothers and I have done this on other servers and we have literally never had a problem. I can prove my identity as well as my brothers identities with a group Discord video call if it has to come down to that. Check Disc DMs if you want to go that route to make this easier.

What does this even prove? Literally nothing. Just because you look at creation dates doesn't mean that ties my identity to that account. You need better evidence than that dude. I gave them the original account and I made a new one because at the time they didn't understand how stuff like that worked. We all shared the same steam account until I created this one, and bought all the games I play with money I worked for. If you want to get that deep I have multiple family photos with myself and my triplet younger brothers, we all play Garry's mod and RP together sometimes.

+1 YESSS I NEED TO DO THIS ONG HARD ASF FOR ME TO TYPE TO MFS

+1 Smart and Knows what to do and how to handle any situations

+1

I can link you a server and show you how theirs works but it would be advertising tldr commands dont pop up over your head so speaking in languages, radio, advertisements, etc wouldn't pop up also there is a character limit for what can go above your head. Also, it does not stack so you can't flood your overhead messages.

+1 FiveM does the same thing and there is no issues with it.

i mean totally in theory but it could be configured in a way where 1. Font is different, text colour is different, text is physically smaller and more lowkey 2. A character limit which cuts after x so its useful to see who has said what but still need to read it in chat. "Hey dude, so i was [...]" 3. Only have it activate when you're in range of x number of people. so if there is 2 or less people near you it would not need to activate, but 3 or more it would. 4. A Cooldown so it can't stack or spam over someone's head. But it's a huge change and leap that would impact the game visually. I don't imagine most people would want it.

+1 banned jmoorsey

what if someone does a/dvertisement and blinds everybody afaik theres no character limit for chat, meaning minges could easily spam chat and blind everyone.

https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/jJIxCH8Isg7wDEbKS?invite=cr-MSxSZWwsNzcyMjcyMTEs heres a video showing it way better than the 3 bubbles

+1

+1

Great guy, good RPer and would be a good fit on the staff team. +1

Keep my name out yo mouth +1

theres already a big ass bubble that pops up that shows someone is typing Just look brah

Nigga this better be a joke

RuneScape Chat Messages · gmodstore A lot easier to tell who typed something when you are dealing with unknowns and generic descriptions.

I'll take these points into consideration, better than just ignoring the thread. For what I outright agree'ed with, we can see about amending that soon. Feel free to message me directly if you want to discuss further. I'll label this as 'partially' accepted otherwise.

I don't see how this rule isn't followed, faction alliances are very clearly defined and there's a maximum 5 factions in each? What proxies exist? If you mean puppet factions those have 'existed' or have been a thing long before conflict rules existed. Maybe, I plan on making more direct definitions for certain things, like territory, in the future, but some of it is blocked by development timelines. Unfortunately people need to confirm with us because in the past they just act on their own which generally means Mass RDM or a fail conflict, I also think level 0 is good because all you need to do is inform us of your intentions and we can look into the matter in case there was some sort of rulebreak in the initial scenario. Let's us get ahead of something developing before it's properly approved, I think it's more annoying for your RP to commence then need to be voided later. This is a good idea. I'll look about defining them. We don't really mediate unless absolutely necessary, it's listed in the thread but the two sides should agree on a third party mediator, if they fail to agree on one because neither trust the other instead of letting the RP stall or die we offer UA to possibly be an ingame mediator since we're meant to be completely unbiased. They can also opt to not have a mediator if it's necessary. Technically this is higher than the current requirement of failed sitdowns involving a mediator, is your intention to raise the number of required sitdowns? In the escalation themselves it says that if it continues it can exceed the max, for instance of a territory dispute hits the maximum escalation and one of the escalation options is to PK an opposing rival then it becomes a new offence (Murder) with a higher max esc cap, they can still begot bad blood, but the point there is if two factions start having issues one minor incident should not lead to war, factions should be rivals for a while before a war, at most here I can see editing around the definitions for max esc or the levels, also a lot of these offences are just examples, there's other reasons that aren't listed that can occur. Smaller less serious conflicts can maybe take place instead for instances of lower escalation, like instead of a bar fight leading to an all out 5v5 war the two factions can have a 1v1 conflict of firebombing / bar fights for a week.

+1 he was a good moderator for the short time he was around.