Jump to content

Luca "Knight" Alfanao PK Appeal


Recommended Posts

Name of Character: Luca "Knight" Alfanao

Character ID: 188239

SteamID: 76561198073885026

Your Discord ID#: jjvvo.

Date of PK: 03/10/26

Reason for PK: Killed by LEO

Why should you be unPK'd? What server rule or PK rule was violated?: The Police did not have a valid reason to raid the apartment and this situation should be voided as a result. As seen in the search warrant the stated purpose of the raid was to arrest Antonio DeCavalcante, however after the search warrant was filed and before the raid took place Antonio DeCavalcante was arrested and charged with the crimes described in his arrest warrant. I personally posted his bail for him and while he is out on the streets he has already been arrested and charged, fulfilling the intent of the warrants. Additionally, the admin that took the Officers PK ticket (Animator) is a PD main. This calls into question the Legitimacy of the PK as not only does he have a conflict of interest but he also didn't look at my clip of the situation. Quite frankly I also find it odd that the Officers involved made no attempt to identify themselves as they entered my apartment, I genuinely believed that I was being robbed and as I already had my gun out I shot as soon as I could (an outcome that would have been prevented if they had yelled through the door) also the guy wearing the nonstandard ESU navy blue uniform delayed my ability to realize the guy was a cop significantly.

If possible please provide video evidence or photo evidence if PK does not follow the guidelines:
Apartment Search Warrant:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bJjLLGtVxLaLcZFl9cVXSdhEHkfpdhBAKiXVzejYFfU/edit?tab=t.0
Raid:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mhrGO3A2I43U6qv2b?invite=cr-MSxqMXgsNDYwNTYyOTMx&v=39
Admin Sit:
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mhspRaudWp7adK9ua?invite=cr-MSxNUmwsNDYwNTYyOTMx&v=155

  • Dumb 3
Link to comment

Hello,

 

PK Admin here. Your building was raided pursuant to a warrant. The claim that the raid was invalid does not align with the circumstances of the event.

 

During the execution of the warrant, law enforcement entered the building and you opened fire on officers. Officers returned fire in response, and you were killed as a result of that firefight.

 

Because your death occurred during an armed engagement that you initiated against law enforcement during a lawful raid. Hence why you were PK’ed. 

Edited by AuiAnimtor
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Hey that's the standard ESU uniform also there was a standard patrol cop in the normal bright blue uniform. Ontop that you could see the blue name and the voice of the cop. You have to be actually retarded to go "nuh uh"

Screenshot_20260313_044221_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20260313_044227_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, AuiAnimtor said:

Hello,

Hi.

10 minutes ago, AuiAnimtor said:

PK Administration here. Your building was raided pursuant to a warrant. The claim that the raid was invalid does not align with the circumstances of the event.

As stated in my original post, the warrant was for Antonio DeCavalcante, a man who has already been arrested since the warrant was issued. are you implying that a warrant is still valid after a person gets arrested and the conditions of the warrant are fulfilled? because if so then I guess the PD has several warrants for every property in the city at this point and should just start kicking doors down. Once Antonio was arrested the officers investigating the building should have been recalled and the raid should have not happened, hence the raid being invalid

15 minutes ago, AuiAnimtor said:

During the execution of the warrant, law enforcement entered the building and you opened fire on officers. Officers returned fire in response, and you were killed as a result of that firefight.

I opened fire on an unknown and armed person opening the door to my apartment when I was the only member of my faction online at the time. If Captain John Gordon would like to prevent the shooting of officers then it should stand to reason that he update the PD SOP to ban no-knock raids. Cops IRL rarely just kick a fucking door in for this exact reason and its nonsensical that this was an explicit instruction in the warrant.

19 minutes ago, AuiAnimtor said:

Because your death occurred during an armed engagement that you initiated against law enforcement during a lawful raid. Hence why you were PK’ed. 

A lawful raid to catch an nigga that is already facing charges and is out on bail? the only reason that you would need to go looking for him now that he has been formerly charged is if he doesn't show up for his appointed court date. the warrant has been fulfilled and should no longer be valid.

thanks for the reply!

Link to comment

Hey patrol cop here! 
As the guy who wrote most of the search warrants, we made it clear to the judge, that multiple people had been using the apartment you died in. 

Shock! So no we were not only looking for Antonio DeCav

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Logan said:

Hey

Hi.

18 minutes ago, Logan said:

that's the standard ESU uniform

ESU is a specialist branch, nothing about ESU is "standard". The point I am making is that if the first thing I saw was a royal blue outfit I wouldn't have shot at the officers.

21 minutes ago, Logan said:

also there was a standard patrol cop in the normal bright blue uniform.

Here is a helpful Diagram I made to show where I was looking during this confrontation:1.thumb.PNG.49088da355e1ea0caa0504f2076b3f4a.PNG2.thumb.PNG.0d940ef7cfcb44d960828ee1d141b738.PNG3.thumb.PNG.fc5c0dbaad00f08d38155ce116b31771.PNG

As you can see in the 3 second confrontation the standard blue officer was never where my attention was, it was naturally focused on the guy with a gun rushing into my apt.

30 minutes ago, Logan said:

Ontop that you could see the blue name and the voice of the cop.

I wasn't looking at the names I was trying (and failing) to put my crosshairs on target.

32 minutes ago, Logan said:

You have to be actually retarded to go "nuh uh"

The Don sends his retards...

33 minutes ago, Logan said:

 

Screenshot_20260313_044221_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20260313_044227_Chrome.jpg

Nice aspect ratio man!

Thanks for the reply!

  • Funny 1
Link to comment
20 minutes ago, Gigachad Fabrizio said:

Hey patrol cop here! 

Hi.

25 minutes ago, Gigachad Fabrizio said:

As the guy who wrote most of the search warrants, we made it clear to the judge, that multiple people had been using the apartment you died in. 

Shock! So no we were not only looking for Antonio DeCav

Unless these "multiple people" have a warrant as well then the search warrant (only naming Antonio DeCavalcante and Calogero Capone) should not apply as both parties have been arrested (shock!) and are on bail, making the search warrant no longer valid.

Thanks for the reply!

Link to comment
27 minutes ago, jjvvo said:

Hi.

Unless these "multiple people" have a warrant as well then the search warrant (only naming Antonio DeCavalcante and Calogero Capone) should not apply as both parties have been arrested (shock!) and are on bail, making the search warrant no longer valid.

Thanks for the reply!

That may be so, but that should be legal RP through the courts, but you decided to open fire on two cops, which means you don't have that option.
Be free from gmod!

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Gigachad Fabrizio said:

That may be so

"That may be so." 

Just curious if corruption rules are applicable for cops still, the warrant is invalid due to them both being arrested prior. So basically your directly acknowledging the fact that the warrants were infact invalid, and still decided to raid the room.

Link to comment
  1. Police cannot raid without a warrant. A Judge/DA must sign this warrant.
     -Exceptions apply if they have witnessed a severe felony, or someone is in distress, then they may use probable cause beyond a reasonable doubt to raid. 

     -A report of a potential crime isn’t enough to warrant an armed police raid unless Officers obtain evidence of a crime or life threatening situation is occurring on the residence.   
     -An anonymous tip, or a tip of any sorts does not warrant a raid. You need to get a warrant before entering any property unless you have directly observed a crime happening. 
    1 hour ago, Gigachad Fabrizio said:

    That may be so, but that should be legal RP through the courts, but you decided to open fire on two cops, which means you don't have that option.
    Be free from gmod!

    oh freaky fab...

  • Dumb 3
Link to comment
44 minutes ago, allholyheaven said:
  1. Police cannot raid without a warrant. A Judge/DA must sign this warrant.
     

The warrant was signed, and you have probably seen it too, nice try tho!
How's ur room btw

Link to comment

Just want to add the room was seized! This is more proof that this was all allowed and within the rules!

The warrant was for the location I also want to add! 

You also willingly opened fire on cops like it was said before. 

Link to comment

Do these guys just not know what a search warrant on a property is?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
7 hours ago, Vethar said:

Just want to add the room was seized! This is more proof that this was all allowed and within the rules!

The warrant was for the location I also want to add! 

You also willingly opened fire on cops like it was said before. 

Why was the room seized? It makes no sense that the room would be seized if you were only there for a search warrant. If his death caused some sort of seizure, that’s understandable, but if the intention was to raid the room and then seize it, why? The owner of the room was not there, nor was there any reason to assume there would be anything in the room.

If the assumption was that Antonio was in the room, then that would be what the warrant is for. At the top of the warrant, it clearly states “Search Warrant.” If the point was not to search for him, then what was the reason for kicking in the door almost two days after his arrest? If there is another RP reason for this, then okay. But if this warrant is the only RP evidence used to justify raiding the room, it should not have been done in the first place.

An individual who was seen entering another property days before being arrested and charged doesn’t just get raided because he was there. There would be no reason for a no-knock warrant. Officers would simply make themselves known, enter with a warrant, and inform the occupants that they are entering the room to search for evidence, not two senior officers running in and immediately blasting someone inside the room.

I also find it interesting that only two senior officers from the same faction were involved and that there was no NYPD command present with them. What was the reason to raid the room in the first place if not to find Antonio? From what I’m told, there was no one above the rank of CPL when the raid happened. After the raid, a higher-ranking officer logged on. During raids like this, it would make sense to have more than two officers involved. Am I wrong?

No one is arguing that there was a warrant for the room. They had the right to kick the door and not fully announce themselves. However, the “Search Warrant” was for the room regarding two men who had already been charged, placed in the pen faction, and bailed out before the raid even happened.

So with everything cops can do now, which they couldn’t six months ago, your room can be raided and seized because a felon who was being charged was seen using the room? This seems far outside the realm of what should be allowed. Factions are getting flipped upside down by the NYPD, and this is just another example of cops having too much power in the city.

If this warrant was truly meant to search and seize, the only evidence provided is him using the apartment. There is nothing about him being arrested with drugs from the apartment, or someone leaving the apartment with drugs. These raids are supposed to be based on solid evidence, so why are they being approved with very little evidence and no reasonable probable cause?

 

8 hours ago, Gigachad Fabrizio said:

The warrant was signed, and you have probably seen it too, nice try tho!
How's ur room btw

Lmao, there is so much dumb logic in this warrant that I hope not all of them are like this, because it honestly makes the game unenjoyable if we have to do legal RP 24/7. “That may be so.” You don’t even know why or the reason you raided, which is just funny to me. You just went along for the ride.




Attached is Antonio’s criminal complaint filed on March 5th when he was arrested, and as you can see in the warrant above, it was signed on the 8th. I don’t know the reason for the warrant being signed after the fact. Maybe the judge and the police didn’t know that Antonio had already been arrested, but I don’t understand why they can keep hitting a dead horse whenever they want.

He was already arrested, charged, and put on bail before this warrant was even signed. So if this is some corrupt RP, that’s one thing, but there’s no way this is legitimate and “within the rules.”

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rKQzNRk8xZgPMHonaaiN382Pgt0aE5omZPneSl9Gwrc/edit?tab=t.0 

I hope UA sees that there are many holes in this "Search Warrant" and makes a good decision. There was no reason he should expect a raid on this apartment, so he reacted as anyone would in this kind of situation. No excuse for shooting cops, but within RP, it makes no sense that they would even raid the room to begin with.  

  • Dumb 1
Link to comment
37 minutes ago, Thomas said:

Why was the room seized?

The room was seized because it was clearly being used to process/store illegal narcotics. 
Let me explain it to you step by step.

1. The warrant was signed on the 8th, because Antonio DeCavalcante had still not been arrested at this point.

2. There was multiple people seen using the room. Two of them are indeed Antonio DeCavalcante and Calogero Capone, but still a lot more arrest warrants to go pal. 

3. The criminal complaint was indeed signed on the 5th, because it was needed for an arrest warrant. That is why it's 3 days earlier than the actual search warrant.

4. The room was seized because we found an armed individual processing illegal narcotics, which led to a 2nd search warrant for the lockers/crates in the room, where we found more illegal narcotics.

If you need anything else explained, feel free to reach out!

  • Dumb 1
Link to comment

I understand you’re upset but I really don’t think that you guys know what a search warrant is or you just didn’t take your time to read it over and understand the legal language of it. I don’t want to sound rude but we are going around in a circle trying to explain the warrant.

  • Dumb 1
Link to comment

I'd love a bowl of cereal with milk but i'm all out of milk, gotta go to the grocery store... what? oh we DO have milk in the fridge and i can have my cereal? Ah fuck it i'll go anyways

  • Funny 1
Link to comment

Hey so former DA here, real quick this warrant is genuinely saying they were looking only for image.png.97e77dfb76284a3940232ee39a526e32.png

 

in the apartment which means that any searches after his arrest are unlawful to a massive extreme, your death is considered negligence on the officers part, and any searches resulting in narcotics in the buildings are null and void under fruit of the poisonious tree.

IDK who decided it was a great idea to raid the building, but if he is genuinely out on bail already and facing charges, this warrant despite being signed IS null and void under criminal law as its probable cause is no longer existent (to arrest antonio) thanks guys thats my 50 cents, these cops are deadass corrupt as fuck for using that warrant and highkey might warrant staff bans for false corruption

  • Agree 1
Link to comment

This will be my last reply to this appeal.

The warrant was issued as part of a wildfire. The warrant listed Antonio because he was one of the primary suspects, but the intent of the warrant was to locate him and any related evidence. Therefore, executing the warrant after his arrest was still reasonable due to the ongoing investigation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
35 minutes ago, Gigachad Fabrizio said:

This will be my last reply to this appeal.

The warrant was issued as part of a wildfire. The warrant listed Antonio because he was one of the primary suspects, but the intent of the warrant was to locate him and any related evidence. Therefore, executing the warrant after his arrest was still reasonable due to the ongoing investigation.

That's literally not how the law works buddy, warrants are meant to be precise and explicit so that there can't be any convenient interpretations which is what y'all are trying to do.

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...