Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. In the clip provided, you did speak.
  3. in the rule it doesn't state you can do by model unless im missing something. i never spoke after doing the mug i only typed. my descriptin was literally different after.
  4. Today
  5. Let me break it down fully from when I took the ticket to when I disabled your PK active status. Timm "Eggsy" Caputo made a ticket stating he got mugged and can identify the guy who mugged him. I claim the ticket and bring him to a sit room where I asked him how he could identify you. He said based on your model, voice and description and then sent me a video of you pulling a gun on him in an alleyway and telling him to put his hands up. Your description at this point in time was "Killian Monjaro Behe". I then said to Eggsy I would set you active and told him the risks of going after you then I returned him. I then flew around watching over Eggsy and his Corsican friend closely. They found you over at the park playing chess with Hamir Abdul, you spoke in voice then and your description was still the same. They followed you around for a little bit and found you again by the Trattoria where it appeared to me like you were being hired by Cassanos. You were walking around out front and they went into the Trattoria to fake order food so it didn't seem suspicious that they were in the area. Then you disconnected so I told Eggsy I would wait a little bit of time to see if you would reconnect, if not then he would have to make another ticket later on. Canadian-bacon even confirmed to the staff member who oversaw the PK the second time that you never changed description.
  6. outfit i was wearing when i mugged outfit your claiming i mugged you in above isnt the same proof of me whiteshirting
  7. false i wasnt wearing that when i mugged you i was wearing a trench coat 1. i changed my outfit and description straight after the mugging. (u can check logs about the description) i have proof i changed outfit too 2. i never used my voice after the mugging i was typing after 3. he didnt have my f3 so how would he have known? 4. they have no solid evidence to id me they just say i looked like this? the screenshot they gave was me outside Trattoria but in a completely different suit and i was typing out there too can I see the proof? of the voice match or me in the same clothing? otherwise wouldn't it just be a false PK because it was just a assumption because of my face which isn't valid because they could just say i looked like this with no other proof.
  8. Adding onto this, you never switched your outfit, nor description. I spoke with the employees at the trattoria, informing them that since you mugged me, I would be doing something about it, but I was waiting for you to move so that they didn’t have police suspecting it was them. From there, they stopped hiring you (told me you were looking for a job there) and as soon as you moved from the building to across the street, I moved too. Bullets agreed to set us as active again if i could identify you again, and I provided him with a picture of you wearing the same clothes, in front of the trattoria, no white shirt, different suit, or different description.
  9. what religion is this?
  10. +1 honestly does seem like he learned his lesson, deserves a 2nd chance.
  11. +1 Actually seems serious about wanting to come back
  12. Hi. I am the original administrator who was going to oversee the PK. You mugged a guy without wearing a mask/bandanna to conceal your identity, which allowed the person who was mugged to identify you. You never changed your description or attempted to mask your voice. After Eggsy and his friend in Corsicans did some searching, they were able to find and identify you. They then made a ticket and showed me how they could identify you, and I had set you PK active to them. They followed you for a bit until you disconnected outside the Trattoria. I then told Eggsy I'll give it a little bit of time to see if you would reconnect, and if you didn't reconnect he'd have to remake the ticket to have you set active again. That is everything on my end. I believe @Bullets might have more to contribute as he oversaw the PK later in the night.
  13. Rem

    Pk Appeal

    Your appeal has been reviewed and accepted. Your character has been reinstated and can be used again.
  14. Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.
  15. Rem

    Joey Smith Appeal

    Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.
  16. Why cant the original guy post it
  17. The fact that you don't understand why you got banned for doing something you didn't get punished for in the past, shows that you don't care about the rules. After so many notes and bans, you should have read up on the rules. Now you want to all of the sudden take a test to show that you know the rules, yet you didn't know what item transferring was? You already have a global rule unban claiming you are going to be a great person and RP good. Not break rules and such. You can't properly admit you messed up and tried to transfer.
  18. The situation stems from you item transferring. What happened was a cause from your first rule break. Though it's not inherently a rule break to shoot at PD for having an illegal firearm, your attitude and your RP style shows what your guy's intentions are. You make a white shirt character and then get a automatic firearm to do what?
  19. will say he was newer and apart of a faction that was already reckless around bad influences hyping him up to basically be rule break fodder +1 good luck don’t fuck it up
  20. +1 this guy should 100% come back
  21. I noticed in the sit you said my character was 20 minutes old, then you said 2 hours or something I cant remember which both accusations were false. Also, I didn't start the shootout look at the clip provided. I wasn't willing to catch a felony for that firearm so I wanted to take my chances and flee, I never wanted to get into a shootout I said it multiple times in the clip.
  22. Hi. Im the staff member that initially started the investigation on you and Hayvo. You were banned for Item Transfer & Metagame when I noticed you had somehow acquired large weaponry on a character that was created the day you were banned, same with Hayvo. After investigation I noticed you had dropped a Colt M16A1 (#20972291) on your main character, and Hayvo's alternate character had picked it up. You then switched to your alternate character, and Hayvo switched to his main. Hayvo then proceeded to drop a FAMAS (#21731863) on HIS main character, and you had picked it up. As for the cop baiting part, you immediately started a negative confrontation with police by running as soon as they noticed you had a firearm. If you didn't want to start a shootout, you wouldn't have. This was 100% intentional on your part. That is all from me.
  23. +1 who cares what anzati says
  24. +1 Why not? Everyone deserves a second chance. It is only a game after all. Also I must mention they were pretty consistent with their De Leon (RIP) chars, participating in crew deals, hits, events, & even hiring (believe it or not). I won’t sit here and say they were perfect RPers by any means but they definitely tried.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...