Converting Casino into religious infastructure

[cordelier]

There is a severe and sorely felt lack of adequate religious service on Diverge - especially egregious as most of the playerbase inhabits the server 12 hours a day 7 days a week - and it would therefore only be fitting to convert the server's casinos into Twelver Shia Masjids. The moral character of the scum who play the server would immediately be improved by access to digital Imams, who I will provide at a discounted rate, providing religious and dating instruction to the incels and prostitutes here. I will report the server to the police for illegal gambling if this is denied

[KingJewMonaclu]

Inshallah, +1

[Holiday]

What in the parody post is this

[KingJewMonaclu]

Let's cut the bullshit right from the start: women, as a group, deserve less. Less pay, less power, less respect, less autonomy, less everything. The modern push for "equality" is a giant con job, a feel-good fairy tale peddled by weak men and entitled women to mask the glaring, unfixable reality that females are biologically, historically, economically, and morally inferior when it comes to carrying civilization forward. Men built the world; women decorated it, complained about it, and then demanded half the credit while contributing a fraction of the sweat. Time to stop pretending otherwise. Women deserve less because they are less.

Start with the raw hardware: biology doesn't lie, and it hates feminism. Men's brains average 10-15% larger, with more gray matter dedicated to spatial reasoning, systemizing, and abstract thought—skills that invented fire, wheels, engines, computers, and space travel. Women's brains? Smaller, flooded with estrogen-driven emotional processing, empathy circuits on overdrive, and a multitasking fetish that mostly results in scattered attention and drama. Testosterone makes men aggressive, ambitious, risk-tolerant; estrogen makes women nurturing, agreeable, and prone to hysteria when things don't go their way. Evolution didn't fuck up here—it optimized men for conquest and innovation, women for gestation and child-rearing. That's why men dominate high-stakes fields: CEOs, inventors, generals, explorers. Women excel at... teaching kindergarten and posting Instagram stories about their feelings.

Hormones screw them over monthly. A woman can be a high-functioning professional one week, then a weepy, irritable mess the next because her cycle decided to sabotage productivity. Men? Steady grind, no excuses. Pregnancy and maternity leave? Massive productivity black holes that companies quietly resent but can't say aloud without lawsuits. Why pretend women are interchangeable with men in high-pressure roles when nature literally pauses them for nine months every time they breed? They deserve less opportunity because biology already limits them. Pretending otherwise is just gaslighting the economy.

History is a slaughterhouse of male achievement with women as cheerleaders or hindrances. Every major civilization—Sumer, Egypt, Greece, Rome, China, Renaissance Europe, Industrial Britain, modern America—was forged by men. Wars won by men dying in droves. Inventions patented by men. Philosophies written by men. Women occasionally ruled as queens or regents, but usually through seduction (Cleopatra), inheritance (Elizabeth I), or sheer nepotism—not raw merit. Joan of Arc? A teenage peasant girl who got lucky, then got barbecued. Marie Curie? Outlier, and even she rode on her husband's coattails initially. The overwhelming pattern: men push humanity forward through blood, genius, and sacrifice; women tag along, reproduce, and occasionally nag about how unfair it all is.

Fast-forward: World Wars I and II. Men conscripted, slaughtered in trenches and beaches. Women? Rosie the Riveter propaganda while they assembled planes in safety, then went home to bake victory cakes. Vietnam? Men drafted, women protested in miniskirts. Modern conflicts? Still men dying disproportionately. Yet today women demand equal memorials, equal valor medals, equal everything for doing a fraction of the dying. They deserve less glory because they earned less of it. History isn't kind—it's honest. And honestly, women were spectators for most of it.

Economics exposes the scam hardest. The so-called gender pay gap is a zombie lie that refuses to die. Women "earn" less because they choose softer, lower-paying fields: nursing, teaching, social work, HR—jobs with built-in meaning but crap compensation because they don't generate massive surplus value. Men flock to engineering, tech, finance, oil rigs, construction—dangerous, dirty, high-skill, high-reward. Women want the cushy office gig with flexible hours, then cry discrimination when the paycheck reflects reality. When controlled for hours, experience, negotiation, and field, the gap shrinks to pennies or vanishes. But feminists scream "systemic bias" instead of admitting women prioritize comfort over cash.

Then there's the entitlement tax: maternity leave, paternity "leave" that's rarely taken, affirmative action quotas, diversity hires. Companies forced to promote mediocre women over competent men to hit DEI targets. Result? Lower productivity, innovation stagnation, resentment. Why pay a woman engineer the same as a man when she's more likely to quit for kids, demand remote work, or sue over "microaggressions"? Bad ROI. Women deserve less salary because they invest less sweat equity. If equality meant merit, most would be exposed as overpromoted tokens.

Socially, women have turned victimhood into a superpower. #MeToo became a career-ending weapon for any man accused without proof—innocent until proven guilty, unless you're male. False accusations ruin lives; women walk away unscathed. In dating, hypergamy reigns supreme: women chase the top 20% of men, ignoring the rest, then complain about "no good men left." They want six-foot, six-figure, six-pack Chad while offering OnlyFans thirst traps and emotional baggage. Chivalry? They demand it—doors opened, tabs paid—while preaching independence. Hypocrisy on stilts.

Relationships? Women initiate 70-80% of divorces, often for "unhappiness" or boredom, then strip men of half their assets plus child support via biased courts. Alimony, custody favoritism, "best interests of the child" code for "mothers win." Men work themselves to death providing; women cash checks and move on to the next provider. They deserve less legal protection because they've weaponized the system against the providers.

Culturally, women dilute everything they touch. Literature: Austen’s drawing-room gossip vs. Dostoevsky’s soul-crushing depth. Music: Taylor Swift’s breakup anthems vs. Zeppelin’s primal force. Film: endless rom-coms and girl-boss reboots vs. epics like Apocalypse Now. Social media? Women dominate influencer culture—selfies, makeup tutorials, outrage farming—turning discourse into therapy sessions. Men built the platforms; women flooded them with vapid content. Art suffers when feelings trump skill. Women deserve less cultural influence because their output is shallower, more narcissistic.

Psychologically, women are fragile liabilities. Higher rates of anxiety, depression, neuroticism—burdens on healthcare, workplaces, relationships. Men bottle it up and function; women externalize, therapy-hop, and demand emotional labor from everyone. Leadership? Women favor consensus, empathy, "collaboration"—code for indecision and weakness. Merkel let in millions, creating chaos; Putin crushes dissent. Empathy overkill cripples decisive action. Women deserve less authority because they crumble under real pressure.

Sports? Laughable. Women's leagues exist only because direct competition with men would be massacre. Serena Williams admitted she'd lose to mid-tier male pros. Yet they demand equal prize money for half the effort, fewer sets, lower viewership. Trans men dominating women's divisions just proves the biological gulf. Women deserve less in athletics because they're lesser athletes—full stop.

Demographics seal the doom. Women chasing careers delay or skip motherhood, crashing birth rates below replacement. Single moms raise soft boys and entitled girls. Civilizations die without strong families; women, given freedom, choose Netflix and cats over legacy. Traditional roles worked: men provide and protect, women nurture and support. Upend that, and you get collapse. Women deserve less autonomy because unchecked, they accelerate societal suicide.

Morally, equality rhetoric is poison. It erodes male purpose, feminizes boys, masculinizes girls, and creates a generation of confused, resentful people. Women aren't oppressed—they're overprivileged in divorce courts, education, healthcare funding, safety nets. Men die younger, suicide more, work deadlier jobs, get less sympathy. Yet society worships female fragility. Enough. Women deserve less because pandering to them has already cost us innovation, stability, and sanity.

In the end, this isn't about hate—it's about truth. Men have carried humanity on their backs through ice ages, plagues, wars, and revolutions. Women helped, sure, but mostly by birthing the next wave of men to do it again. The experiment of full equality has failed spectacularly: lower fertility, fractured families, stagnant progress, endless grievance. Roll it back. Give women less—less expectation, less coddling, less power. Force them to earn what they get, like men always have. Only then might society stop circling the drain.

Women deserve less. Not because they're evil. Because reality doesn't grade on a curve.

[Rifsfth]

7 minutes ago, KingJewMonaclu said:

Let's cut the bullshit right from the start: women, as a group, deserve less. Less pay, less power, less respect, less autonomy, less everything. The modern push for "equality" is a giant con job, a feel-good fairy tale peddled by weak men and entitled women to mask the glaring, unfixable reality that females are biologically, historically, economically, and morally inferior when it comes to carrying civilization forward. Men built the world; women decorated it, complained about it, and then demanded half the credit while contributing a fraction of the sweat. Time to stop pretending otherwise. Women deserve less because they are less.

Start with the raw hardware: biology doesn't lie, and it hates feminism. Men's brains average 10-15% larger, with more gray matter dedicated to spatial reasoning, systemizing, and abstract thought—skills that invented fire, wheels, engines, computers, and space travel. Women's brains? Smaller, flooded with estrogen-driven emotional processing, empathy circuits on overdrive, and a multitasking fetish that mostly results in scattered attention and drama. Testosterone makes men aggressive, ambitious, risk-tolerant; estrogen makes women nurturing, agreeable, and prone to hysteria when things don't go their way. Evolution didn't fuck up here—it optimized men for conquest and innovation, women for gestation and child-rearing. That's why men dominate high-stakes fields: CEOs, inventors, generals, explorers. Women excel at... teaching kindergarten and posting Instagram stories about their feelings.

Hormones screw them over monthly. A woman can be a high-functioning professional one week, then a weepy, irritable mess the next because her cycle decided to sabotage productivity. Men? Steady grind, no excuses. Pregnancy and maternity leave? Massive productivity black holes that companies quietly resent but can't say aloud without lawsuits. Why pretend women are interchangeable with men in high-pressure roles when nature literally pauses them for nine months every time they breed? They deserve less opportunity because biology already limits them. Pretending otherwise is just gaslighting the economy.

History is a slaughterhouse of male achievement with women as cheerleaders or hindrances. Every major civilization—Sumer, Egypt, Greece, Rome, China, Renaissance Europe, Industrial Britain, modern America—was forged by men. Wars won by men dying in droves. Inventions patented by men. Philosophies written by men. Women occasionally ruled as queens or regents, but usually through seduction (Cleopatra), inheritance (Elizabeth I), or sheer nepotism—not raw merit. Joan of Arc? A teenage peasant girl who got lucky, then got barbecued. Marie Curie? Outlier, and even she rode on her husband's coattails initially. The overwhelming pattern: men push humanity forward through blood, genius, and sacrifice; women tag along, reproduce, and occasionally nag about how unfair it all is.

Fast-forward: World Wars I and II. Men conscripted, slaughtered in trenches and beaches. Women? Rosie the Riveter propaganda while they assembled planes in safety, then went home to bake victory cakes. Vietnam? Men drafted, women protested in miniskirts. Modern conflicts? Still men dying disproportionately. Yet today women demand equal memorials, equal valor medals, equal everything for doing a fraction of the dying. They deserve less glory because they earned less of it. History isn't kind—it's honest. And honestly, women were spectators for most of it.

Economics exposes the scam hardest. The so-called gender pay gap is a zombie lie that refuses to die. Women "earn" less because they choose softer, lower-paying fields: nursing, teaching, social work, HR—jobs with built-in meaning but crap compensation because they don't generate massive surplus value. Men flock to engineering, tech, finance, oil rigs, construction—dangerous, dirty, high-skill, high-reward. Women want the cushy office gig with flexible hours, then cry discrimination when the paycheck reflects reality. When controlled for hours, experience, negotiation, and field, the gap shrinks to pennies or vanishes. But feminists scream "systemic bias" instead of admitting women prioritize comfort over cash.

Then there's the entitlement tax: maternity leave, paternity "leave" that's rarely taken, affirmative action quotas, diversity hires. Companies forced to promote mediocre women over competent men to hit DEI targets. Result? Lower productivity, innovation stagnation, resentment. Why pay a woman engineer the same as a man when she's more likely to quit for kids, demand remote work, or sue over "microaggressions"? Bad ROI. Women deserve less salary because they invest less sweat equity. If equality meant merit, most would be exposed as overpromoted tokens.

Socially, women have turned victimhood into a superpower. #MeToo became a career-ending weapon for any man accused without proof—innocent until proven guilty, unless you're male. False accusations ruin lives; women walk away unscathed. In dating, hypergamy reigns supreme: women chase the top 20% of men, ignoring the rest, then complain about "no good men left." They want six-foot, six-figure, six-pack Chad while offering OnlyFans thirst traps and emotional baggage. Chivalry? They demand it—doors opened, tabs paid—while preaching independence. Hypocrisy on stilts.

Relationships? Women initiate 70-80% of divorces, often for "unhappiness" or boredom, then strip men of half their assets plus child support via biased courts. Alimony, custody favoritism, "best interests of the child" code for "mothers win." Men work themselves to death providing; women cash checks and move on to the next provider. They deserve less legal protection because they've weaponized the system against the providers.

Culturally, women dilute everything they touch. Literature: Austen’s drawing-room gossip vs. Dostoevsky’s soul-crushing depth. Music: Taylor Swift’s breakup anthems vs. Zeppelin’s primal force. Film: endless rom-coms and girl-boss reboots vs. epics like Apocalypse Now. Social media? Women dominate influencer culture—selfies, makeup tutorials, outrage farming—turning discourse into therapy sessions. Men built the platforms; women flooded them with vapid content. Art suffers when feelings trump skill. Women deserve less cultural influence because their output is shallower, more narcissistic.

Psychologically, women are fragile liabilities. Higher rates of anxiety, depression, neuroticism—burdens on healthcare, workplaces, relationships. Men bottle it up and function; women externalize, therapy-hop, and demand emotional labor from everyone. Leadership? Women favor consensus, empathy, "collaboration"—code for indecision and weakness. Merkel let in millions, creating chaos; Putin crushes dissent. Empathy overkill cripples decisive action. Women deserve less authority because they crumble under real pressure.

Sports? Laughable. Women's leagues exist only because direct competition with men would be massacre. Serena Williams admitted she'd lose to mid-tier male pros. Yet they demand equal prize money for half the effort, fewer sets, lower viewership. Trans men dominating women's divisions just proves the biological gulf. Women deserve less in athletics because they're lesser athletes—full stop.

Demographics seal the doom. Women chasing careers delay or skip motherhood, crashing birth rates below replacement. Single moms raise soft boys and entitled girls. Civilizations die without strong families; women, given freedom, choose Netflix and cats over legacy. Traditional roles worked: men provide and protect, women nurture and support. Upend that, and you get collapse. Women deserve less autonomy because unchecked, they accelerate societal suicide.

Morally, equality rhetoric is poison. It erodes male purpose, feminizes boys, masculinizes girls, and creates a generation of confused, resentful people. Women aren't oppressed—they're overprivileged in divorce courts, education, healthcare funding, safety nets. Men die younger, suicide more, work deadlier jobs, get less sympathy. Yet society worships female fragility. Enough. Women deserve less because pandering to them has already cost us innovation, stability, and sanity.

In the end, this isn't about hate—it's about truth. Men have carried humanity on their backs through ice ages, plagues, wars, and revolutions. Women helped, sure, but mostly by birthing the next wave of men to do it again. The experiment of full equality has failed spectacularly: lower fertility, fractured families, stagnant progress, endless grievance. Roll it back. Give women less—less expectation, less coddling, less power. Force them to earn what they get, like men always have. Only then might society stop circling the drain.

Women deserve less. Not because they're evil. Because reality doesn't grade on a curve.

Agreed they dont have the mental capability to make desisions everything is about emotions.

Goy lo tikalel though

[Rifsfth]

Just now, Rifsfth said:

Agreed they dont have the mental capability to make desisions everything is about emotions.

Goy lo tikalel though

I thought you where gigajewdon