DopeAsRoe

I really like this. I think using the animation you have when giving money could be applied as well which would be cool.

Sitting on rumour in the safety of PD is hardly detective work. Hamir did actual work

Hamir Abdul kinda was. Nobody really comes close that I can think of other than commerce lol

I do like the idea of dead drops, just not anything related to a factions properties. A actual dead drop shouldn't be connected to any side, like the stashes. This also allows cops to do stake outs on hot dead drops.

I think this is a terrible idea straight up. I like the idea of maybe stashes having an added purpose to double as a drop box but this, no. The idea of bringing illegal RP in the scale of crew deals into properties where almost every single faction has clear rules defining no criminal activity is to take place in them is silly. "This is an added risk that actually sets properties as valid targets, that *can* finally be seized for conduct, as currently its very rare that a property is seized." ^ There is a reason property seizure is rare, it's because HC puts rules in place to not do any stupid illegal shit inside their properties! It's not a bad thing that properties you paid a lot for aren't getting snatched by cops left and right. "Your properties at risk, but your men are safe. You can rebuild, maybe get the property back. Most factions have 2 properties, one they use and one they don't. The risk would be losing a property you're probably not even using." There is so many things wrong with just this sentence alone. What makes you think people aren't getting killed for getting a property seized?? Most factions pay at least 2 million for a second property. There any many reasons why you would want a second property like a 2nd hiring location, place to meet, events, etc. Saying "Well most people don't use those so might as well risk them being seized" is just . Maybe back when factions could own more than 2 properties, but in this era, no. I think the only people that would use this feature are newer factions who maybe don't have an apartment, which again, is not a good thing. Why would you risk 1 entire property, rather than 1 apartment room. To save some guys? In that case, only do 1 on 1 deals. tl;dr Not worth the risk of losing a property (potentially indefinitely). And if caught cops are swarming/seizing your "legal business" (with HC names likely tied to it), opposed to a shitty apartment room.

Ban 99% of the british playerbase (crocie can stay) Remove all vehicles made after 1995 Unban Jmoorsey

Powergaming = Forcing unfair actions against another person using OOC means (See powergame rule section) By dropping a brick you're essentially trying to force an outcome. If a cop was walking by and saw a weed brick on the property, you would potentially be getting all those people in trouble. Something that wouldn't have happened if you hadn't dropped the brick. It's also not something you would do in RP. Nobody would go up to a mob ran hotel irl and drop weed right in front of them trying to frame them. You've been playing since July 14th and you have acquired 6 bans. "1 this is the 1st time i have gotten banned in like 2 or 3 months because i have actually not been dicking around and doing dumb shit." I'm sure being banned for almost the entirety of August helped lol Please read the rules and rule abbreviations to better understand the rules and type of server that this is. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Even though this may have not been a target mug (Crazy "coincidence" getting the same guy back to back), you created this character 3 hours before you mugged the victim. Now this doesn't immediately prove that you're a mugging character so I dug a little deeper. I looked into your logs and saw that you did not in fact "find those guns". You ordered them on your main character Anthony and went to the shipment when it arrived, dropped the guns, swapped characters to pick them up on Darnell. This is item transfer and racket abuse. You made no taxi adverts, no meaningful roleplay (no going to jail doesn't count), you didn't even pull out a taxi on this character from what I can see. Expanding further on the "No meaningful roleplay" because you seemed confused to Dutch's reply. By "meaningful roleplay" we mean building up an actual character, something like buying a house and growing weed in the basement. Not just creating a character to run from police or mug/scam people. Seeing as you lied about the guns, it makes me curious as to if you also lied about not target mugging this guy. You have 2 previous bans for fail mug within the past month. You should know the rules regarding mugging by now.

Bro locked in after his ban This is actually a good idea

Hello, I'm the Admin who banned you. The reason you were banned is because a player made a report that you had LTARPd during a police confrontation. I waited a few minutes and you did reconnect, I brought you to the sit room where you disconnected again so I issued a 1 day ban based on your past offence. Logs do show that you might've had some connection issues.

+1 Adding an option to toggle the visibility of them would be very cool to see.

You just got back after a 2 day ban for NITRP & RDM and it looks like you still have no intention to engage in roleplay. You weren't minging by "asking for jobs"; you were doing it by trying to bait people into hitting you so that you could stab them. You were even given a warning to stop the shenanigans. It was pretty generous that you were only banned for 12 hours considering your previous ban. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

This is actually a really good rage bait technique, I have not seen this one before

As Cookies mentioned, just because he was being annoying on the piano, doesn't mean you should just kill him. You did not follow the proper steps to escalate the situation before resorting to killing him. You also could have contacted a staff member to explain the situation to, and have them deal with it. With your previous bans, you should know the proper escalation rules. That being said, I do believe a week is a little long given the circumstances, so I will reduce the ban to 3 days. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and accepted. The ban will be reduced to 3 days.

Hello, I'm the Admin who oversaw your PK. Yes, you were killed for "Bringing heat to the family by causing conflict with allies and minging". This means you allegedly broke factions rules and were subsequently PK'd, which a risk you accept when you hit the "I understand and accept the risks" button on the "Crime Faction Warning" pop-up The burden of proof and response to this thread falls on the ticket maker.

Hello, I'm the admin who oversaw your PK. As you know, you were killed by Don's orders for "Giving away a Kutte coat". According to the person who gave the orders, this is a violation of their faction rules and you were subsequently pkd.

Just buy lobster

You were warned 2 separate time to stop abusing your pet flags within 4 days of one another. You were flying people around on props and smacking cars. The last time you were warned you immediately went right back to causing issues. I don't see this as a genuine apology or acceptance of wrong doing. This is not a permanent revoking or denial of your flags, you can still reapply for them back in the coming weeks/months. Your flag appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this blacklist to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Yea ofc it doesn't have to be 1-1 with IRL but it would be something for the government to regulate in some capacity

Could be fixed by making ADS slightly more accurate. Beanbag rounds are little lead pillows, so its not like missing a taser shot. If you missed it's more than likely because you suck at aiming lol. In my opinion it wouldn't make any sense for Big Oil Co to have access to as non-lethal weapons racket either.

Bean bag rounds can kill or maim someone. So if civs can use/access them specific regulations can and should apply. Like only being able to use it on private property or requiring to show ID. And obviously brandishing them would still have a legal penalty. Slightly changing the functionality of pre-existing mechanics would make more sense than giving civs access to a beanbag shotgun. Like making it so where if you smack someone with a gun or a baseball bat it stuns them for a second like the baton.

Toss up between Caboose and 4lights, 2 baddies imo

+1 for freaky cuffs tho

Beanbag shotgun's 1. Knocking somebody over is extremely over powered, especially in a situation where such a device would be practical whether its a cop or conflict situation 2. What sense does it make for civilians to openly carry around a beanbag shotgun? 3. How far of a distance? Only way I see this being balanced is if it can only reach like across the street. ------------------------------------ Pepper Spray 1. Aim should matter when using pepper spray, a body shot should not impair your vision. Should be headshots only. 2. The lingering effect wouldn't be terrible, but would have to be pretty short and a small linger area. 3. A limit of 3-4 uses before it runs out is pretty fair but should have a slight cooldown in between sprays if it causes a lingering effect. ------------------------------------ There would be no real reason that civilians need a beanbag shotgun. Maybe pepper spray but where would you get it? If its a racket, would civs have access to it? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense for them to. It would have to be added something like a light weapons racket that has things like pistols and melee weapons rather than its own separate racket. Maybe then I could see it being somewhat plausible. Even if only cops had them, both items would have to do actual damage so normal pk and escalation rules apply in cop and conflict situations. While both of these are non-lethal, they still do damage like a baton does. Being shot by a beanbag round isn't like being shot with a rubber bullet, you can fracture/break bones, and cause other serious injuries. And obviously pepper spray burns your eyes and throat. ------------------------------------ Overall, I don't hate the idea of either of these. They would just have to being incorporated in such a way where it doesn't give the user unfair advantages. I really only see beanbag weaponry being used by law enforcement. Pepper spray on the other hand might have actual civilian use if its done properly. Edit: The main issue/reason I see people saying add other non-lethal alternatives is because tasers can be a lil weird sometimes. My answer to that is get good or maybe add a stun gun that you have to make contact with like the baton.