anzati1

replying to this post is my favorite experience with a minge https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1TAFRg-M9zBhdg?invite=cr-MSxrR24sMTA3ODcwODM1&v=20 https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/ivE7ZoJ8c7KuX3m6v?invite=cr-MSxUcjIsMTA3ODcwODM1&v=28

logs only go so far back until a higher rank needs to search the deep storage. im not apart of this ban nor have an opinion, but if it is true, evidence other than both of the accounts will help you a lot more. you said you use the same computer but have multiple videos of both of you playing, just take a picture of the computers beside eachother and dm it to a higher staff.

1. Roleplay Skill vs. Community Behavior Much of the support in this thread revolves around the idea that “Whispers” was an exceptionally creative and immersive character. Supporters describe the voice acting, the unique presence, and the sense of atmosphere the character brought into roleplay. While nobody is denying that drm009 has the ability to create an interesting persona, this point is ultimately irrelevant when weighed against the repeated issues that led to his removal from the community. Roleplay skill is not the same as being a good community member. A player can be talented in creating voices, writing stories, or acting out scenarios, and yet still be harmful overall. What matters most is whether someone contributes to the health of the server and respects both the players and the staff who keep it running. The unfortunate reality is that drm009 consistently demonstrated the opposite: a pattern of hostility, an inability to respect boundaries, and behavior that escalated tensions rather than defused them. 2. History of Hostility and Aggression Looking at past conduct, it is clear that this is not an isolated incident. The ban did not occur because of a single mistake or a minor misunderstanding — it came after a long buildup of concerning behavior. There are repeated accounts of drm009 becoming confrontational in OOC chats, making comments that crossed the line from heated debate into outright insults, and lashing out when criticized. This kind of pattern is not something that can be overlooked simply because a character was memorable. Every time staff attempted to address issues, the responses were defensive or hostile rather than reflective. It is telling that even now, the focus of the appeal and the supporting comments is primarily on the supposed greatness of the character, rather than genuine acknowledgment of the harm caused. That lack of accountability is the clearest sign that nothing has really changed. 3. The Nature of the Supporting Comments Another red flag in this appeal thread is the style of the supporting comments themselves. Many of them read as over-the-top, excessively flowery, and suspiciously AI-like in tone — long passages of dramatic praise, calling the character “irreplaceable” or framing his absence as a deep cultural loss to the community. This sort of exaggeration feels performative rather than genuine. In reality, no single player is ever irreplaceable. The community has continued without Whispers. New characters have arisen, new stories have been told, and the server has thrived in spite of this absence. To suggest otherwise diminishes the contributions of every other player who has put in the effort to build experiences here. It also feels manipulative, as if the goal is to pressure staff into reversing a justified decision by burying them under walls of inflated praise. 4. Risk of Reintroducing Drama If this ban were to be lifted, it is highly likely that the same issues would resurface. Nothing in the appeal or its replies demonstrates that drm009 has genuinely reflected on their past actions, taken accountability, or made efforts to improve how they interact with others. Without that foundation, there is no reason to believe that the outcome would be any different the second time around. The last thing the server needs is a return of old drama. Every time one disruptive player is reintroduced, it risks reopening old wounds, reigniting arguments, and creating unnecessary division. Communities thrive on trust and consistency, and nothing erodes that faster than the perception that toxic behavior is tolerated simply because someone is entertaining in character. 5. The Ban as a Necessary Safeguard Bans are not handed out lightly. When a permanent ban is issued, it is done so with the understanding that staff have weighed the evidence, seen the recurring behavior, and determined that the risks outweigh the benefits. To overturn that decision would require overwhelming proof that the player has changed, acknowledged their wrongdoing, and demonstrated sustained improvement outside the server. None of that is present here. What we do see is an appeal that leans on the character’s popularity rather than accountability. We see supporters who write long essays filled with flowery language but little substance. And we see no clear plan or assurance that the problems that led to the ban would not repeat themselves. 6. Protecting the Health of the Community Ultimately, the question staff must answer is simple: does unbanning this player make the community stronger, safer, and more enjoyable for everyone? Based on everything here, the answer is clearly no. The risks are too high, the past behavior too damaging, and the lack of genuine accountability too obvious. The health of the community must come before nostalgia for a single character. Countless players contribute every day without causing disruption, without disrespecting staff, and without driving wedges between members. Those are the people who deserve to be prioritized and supported — not someone who repeatedly undermined the community’s stability and is now attempting to return without real change. Conclusion: While drm009 may be skilled at creating characters, roleplay ability is not a substitute for respect, accountability, and maturity. The ban was justified, and nothing in this appeal demonstrates that it should be lifted. Allowing this player back would risk undoing the stability that has been built since their removal and would send the wrong message about what behavior is acceptable. For these reasons, I strongly urge staff to deny this appeal and uphold the permanent ban.

350z should be buffed 1000%, zero grippers on that thang but its a cool car. not even enough bad grip to drift it backwards

a lot of the head models don't have glasses or hat bones, this is a custom bone position for hats and glasses to merge into, therefore we need to tie it to the head bone. problem with head bone is that not every head has the same shape or size, not even remotely the same height from headbone to top of the head sadly. ONTOP of that, not all hats or glasses use the hat bone or glasses bone. it would be a lot of work to convert these hats and glasses to use different bones. also, generally a lot of hats and glasses are made to fit male 09, since its the most popular male head model.

"guys i waited a whopping 7 days, i did nothing wrong" you're a joke and a rat, always come crawling back saying that you learned something else or something new, but never once has changed or matured or realized hey maybe i shouldn't do this thing?

ah hellll nawhhh, i dont comment much on these apps but FUCKKKK NOOOOOO. dog.... i remember banning you almost 4 times in a row literally 30 minutes after being unbanned, you'd get banned again. you're a massive minge and cop baiter. i don't think you've ever actually JOINED a faction lmfao

xi ping-ping is my favorite character on diverge networks mafia roleplay garrys mod

how do you manage to get "community exiled" from a nazi rp?

the whole “i’ve grown up” act is looking really nice lol also, it’s a permaban, anyone can comment on it. it’s not entitled opinions or whatever the hell you’re rambling about, i was just saying the facts that you tried to alt the day before the appeal, and suddenly you remembered that you were banned? yea okay sure

basically just tried to alt to get back into the server and now asking for an unban, be a little more honest and say you fucked up. STEAM_0:1:958330584

opinions on staff apps mean quite literally nothing when you comment lol

WELLLL WELLLLLL WELLLLLLLLLLLL WHAT DO WE HAVE HERE

224 word count for your back story, while yes the question does say 250+ minimum, read some of the other accepted applications to understand what the expectations are. you dont need to do 500 or 250 or 800 words, but a large majority of the other apps are more in depth about their backstories. also !time ingame to see your playtime.