4Lights

The officer must make a reasonable attempt to arrest you. In the context of watching the brown car, I think it's more than possible to miss the officer. Further, you were at a pitted position at the time of the officer shooting. Without any other instructions given, this PK lacks the officers POV and may lack crucial context. With the officer also stating he just shot, because of minge behavior from a third party. I find a reasonable attempt at arrest was not made in this case. Also, I know you touched on this. But give Adam a break, he's doing his best so that we all can have a solid platform to play on, there's no bias here and he doesn't deserve any grief over this or for you to paint him in a negative light. Your appeal has been reviewed and accepted. Your character has been reinstated and can be used again.

Hey there. You have 3 PO's for RDM, 1 for mass VDM and than for VDM/Fail Mug. You have all these bans in the last year. The clip shows you showing a blatant disregard for the person your VDM and the person you ran over for no reason. The mugging is a fail mug and you participated, with your record you are lucky to have no gotten further punishment. On these basis I will be denying this appeal. 4 Days is more than fair. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

Hey ban will expire soon, you could argue accidental, but it does seem fairly intentional. You have notes and bans for minging/nitrp, avdm and NLR. So it's likely this was interpreted as you continuing to minge and you were punished more harshly. You have only been in the server since march, if you continue to amass a record you will be punished more and more harshly. Your ban appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this ban to be reasonable and/or justified. Ensure you have read our Server Rules.

It's for both. Expands possible things to do as a corrupt cop, and gives an untrustworthy mechanic. Where you would need to trust the person involved, gives the ability for either party. To cause issues for the other involved.

1. Allow the police, rank locked. To sell select equipped firearms ( on your back items ) to criminals as single use weapons ( too hot to store ). 2. Create a command that police can use to check the serial of anyone who has these weapons on their back. The serial can be checked in the police computer, to see the officer who the gun is requisitioned out to. 3. Allow police to set up busts using this mechanic. As to make it untrustworthy and promote having a corrupt guy on the inside. - If you have an alt in a faction, the command doesn't run.

Hello banning staff here. You were part of an investigation for it which it was found you heavily middlemaned a number of high value items and transferred the majority of your own from your Callaghan character, through a proxy; sharing all of your banks with McCarthy characters, leaving them nearly empty. You took a lot of items from Cannon's original character, transferred many into #Gift or #Locker 1. You maintained direct access to a number of high value McCarthy banks which were used as deposit points. I do not see any evidence of fair market value being paid, I see April 15, the day after Cannon was PKed and the days leading up to to it. You and others simple exploited sharing banks with eachother to move stuff to McCarthy accounts. Example: #62207 (MESO P/E) and #62553 (Texas P/E) your nearly empty Callaghan banks are shared to the following permissions. With others having shared similar access for your McCarthy character. ex; #Gift (OWNER) Ethan O’Connor Eoin “Toasty” Dunlavey Niall Dunlavey Aisling McCarthy Yes it looks bad considering that it could and has hurt Callaghan, if you wanted out. This was not the approach, you can't just simply act as a group; drain all valuables from your Callaghan characters and start new civs using the resources obtained. This is character abuse. This was a concerted effort involving multiple individuals to jumpstart a new faction, throwing away your old characters in the process. With allegation involving attempting to poach members, while maintaining said characters, which could effectively sabotage said faction. Other do it isn't a viable defense, if we catch word of wrong doing and investigation yield results. We will punish accordingly.

Hello banning staff. We have compiled a 150+ document that links to this ban. What it has shown is you assisted in item-transfer before becoming staff. Notably an NOI suit. I believe you took the opportunity to learn how to safely transfer your items, while as staff. Exploiting information learned. You had your friends systematically empty all your old bank accounts and then shared access to those bank accounts with you and your McCarthy friends, on McCarthy characters. Your friends and you transferred large amounts of items of high value items. The day after you got Pked on April 15th, most everyone involved shows up on this day passing items between each other and into select banks. ( some even spamming lobsters to obscure logs ) These select banks typically being a Callaghan bank shared with McCarthy characters. Including a specific 'Gift' bank, which you were added to on your Cannon and your Aisling McCarthy character ( later removed ), which contained many high value items from your previous char. You were straight given other item from Callaghan characters such as your Thomas' suit. Other banks such as Locker #1, had guns originating from Callaghan characters and your dead character. Passed between characters to be put into said locker. Notable items include a Mini-14 dropped and deposited. It was also identified previous to the investigations as a "McCarthy gun bank". With information being provided including dms and screenshots. You and several others, emptied their banks of their most valued possessions into these banks. You appear to conducted a large meth for cocaine deal, a couple days before getting pked and redirected that cocaine. A few webhooks to unauthorized discords were put into these banks. Linking to people involved. The evidence shows you maintained technical possession of your items for use for your new faction and employed a systematic approach to doing so. If you wish to confess your full involvement, it may help your appeal. Otherwise please wait for another staff to respond.

Hey, sorry but this is not a situation, that will typically be handled in a support VC. Please wait for another staff to respond. EDIT: To be clear, because it's an appeal and has been ruled upon already.

There could be a number of reasons. Typically the hitbox isn't the same as the model, here is a full explanation from ai.

Hey, just FYI. The appeal process starts with the banning staff, who responds to why they banned the person and is processed by another staff member without their involvement in the final say. You are actively backing up on this clip, the model clipping slightly because of it. Is not a bug.

Hello banning staff here. From examining the clip, it looked intentional to me. You sped past the vehicle, then went full speed backed up into the car. Even continuing backing up after he died. While this is not always going to blow up the vehicle, in this situation you initiated and followed through and caused a death. You had previous offenses for the same thing and your behavior in the sit, I believed to be mingey and lack any sort of remorse. Simply insisting it wasn't your fault and refusing to take any sort of responsibility for the incident that you caused. You currently have 6 bans and 2 notes in 11 months, if this was a first offense, I would have been more lenient. But considering that, and I don't believe this to be an accident or bug. I think this was more than fair.

https://www.nytimes.com/sitemap/1989/05/12/

Just gonna put this here. May 8th - Times 1989 https://time.com/vault/issue/1989-05-08/page/1/ ____ May/June - Nintendo Power 1989 https://archive.org/details/nintendopowerissue006mayjune1989 ie; ____ News May 11th 1989 - The Palladium Times https://www.nyshistoricnewspapers.org/?a=d&d=pal19890511-01.1.1&e=-------en-20--1--txt-txIN---------- - You can access historical news papers from New York, at NYS Historical News Papers New York from 1700 - Present. https://www.nyshistoricnewspapers.org/?a=cl&cl=CL2&e=-------en-20--1--txt-txIN---------- also https://archive.org/details/tpir-7194d-ob

Your appeal has been reviewed and denied. We have determined this PK to be reasonable and/or justified. You may not re-appeal this PK.

Hey, so given the circumstances. You mugged someone who had your F3 doing over $10,000 damage to them. You are revealed several times and you take several photographs with your full name. The clips given, reasonably would identify you. The 30 minutes is only if they do not have their F3. ( 3 Guns value exceeding 10k were taken. ) ■ The person in question, must have repeatedly done something to directly harm you, your family, or another member of your family. Unwarranted Harm in a financial (+10,000$) or repeated physical way, there has to be tangible damages, disrespect is not a reason to kill someone. This also means you cannot PK someone JUST for being part of an enemy faction. Having continued gunfights, scams or warnings about territory, money or other continued violent disputes can cause escalation to a PK. (Be sure to record all encounters/transgressions) Credit Monaclu for flow char below: As this PK had nothing to do with escalation directly, you were simply identified and retaliated against for mugging by someone with your F3. I will be denying this appeal.