All Activity
- Past hour
-
Set an IRL age requirement on PD supervisor positions (backed by science)
Drakarus replied to Trak's topic in Suggestions
Thats the captains brother lol. Hence why Trigger said. Captains can bypass it. -
Set an IRL age requirement on PD supervisor positions (backed by science)
Trak replied to Trak's topic in Suggestions
False, there is a 14 year old LT. My suggestion would make it so it is strictly enforced. -
dont think any UA or even pendred cares for your opinion, im sure whatever interaction youve had with me is skewered, and the rda powergame shit was retarted as the person i was dealing with wasnt rping at all.
-
Set an IRL age requirement on PD supervisor positions (backed by science)
Trigger replied to Trak's topic in Suggestions
Well this is already a thing but captains can bypass it by giving people permission -
In recent conversations it has been increasingly frustrating for many in PD having to listen to literal children act like they know what they are doing and have the ability to boss people around. While this may be a rp server and a video game it is by no means designed for little children or meant to appear to that target audience, with a bulk of the server in their 20s-30s. Being a police officer is a high stress job as shown in this peer reviewed scientific article. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6400077/ Stress is mostly managed by the development of the frontal lobal (prefrontal cortex). (See image 1) This image shows that this functioning of the brain for stress, reasoning, and many factors that play into being a police officer come from this portion of the brain. Image 2 is a snippet of a scientific journal explaining the brain development specifically about the frontal lobe in teenagers. This snippet describes how teenagers may be able to cope with stress in calm situations, but in fast paced situations and high stress environments they react much more poorly. My suggestion is to demote all those under the age of 18 in PD command to senior officer and limit all supervisor roles to those above the age of 18. While this is still not an ideal age, this age marks legal adulthood. I also think we should strongly enforce the no one below the age of 16 in PD and actively discharge all those under that age. Thank you for listening to my Ted Talk.
-
I have had many interactions with you as PD! I also know you have been punished multiple times and even recently been blacklisted for RDA/Powergame! Definitely not a fit at all for staff, I am surprised you are still allowed on the server.
-
how does bro know my backstory lmao? i have never interacted with you before, all my notes majority are from a long time ago, ive been playing for 5 years, and my perma ban was 2/3 years ago. With all of these notes and such, i still got accepted to staff 3 times so? idk
-
-1 has 33 notes, props blacklisted, 3 bans this year so far, and had a perma for mass rdm. Not sure why he would even apply. Never had any actual good interactions with this player. Not fit for staff at all.
-
Ain’t even gonna hate, I respect it. Good luck pimpin.
-
well the 10% of his donning was better than your donning will ever be
- Today
-
PK bait?? RDM bait?? you just saying shit nigga. If you feel so strongly about these opinions open up a staff report on me bud, if any of these accusations are true I'll be dealt with
-
bro idk what we did to u brodie, ive never spoken to u b4
-
Over riding my dick litterally every chance you get you threaten to mug me over shit I have 0 involvement in. I stated an opinion and you felt it necessary to ride my dick with your bf enzo. String and bullets are d1 retards who do nothing but minge pk bait and rdm bait. Almost as insufferable as you riding my dick every chance you get then try and use jay who btw played fivem and dark and darker 90% of his time.
-
not sure what ive done to u, but um
-
good one
-
Your Character or Steam Name: Chrissy Soprana Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): STEAM_0:0:498443887 Your Discord ID#: memesterrr Reason for ban: LTARP Length of ban: 3 Days Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): I was jailed last night, forced to spend almost a whole hour in interrogation room with no acknowledgement. and I already mentioned to the mod/admin Greenvghost (same person that banned me) that i need to get this done so i can get to my sisters graduation in the morning (mind you its close to 1 am and I wasnt expecting to be ignored in a room alone for almost an hour) he acknowledges that and gets me close to no help. im jailed for 40 minutes and im told i can just come back on later and finish up the sentence later since I need to wake up in 5 hours. Why should you be unbanned? I did nothing wrong! im willing to spend my '40 year' sentance again just so i can play man! i wasnt trying to avoid punishment but im also not leaving my pc on all night to let my fake make believe character stand there while i sleep. whats the difference? if anything, me coming back online to serve my sentence is more of a display of willingness to serve the sentence and RP. lets be for real here and have a heart. my lil sis just graduated and i was supposed to waste my sleep to sit in a cell? like i said jail me again and let me join.
-
Over what? This isn't about a certain topic, you're coming at string and bullets for zero reason which aren't even true by the way. And I'm just stating the truth, you're a drooling don with zero common sense. #BringJayBack
-
Hmm I’m not sure then I might have u mixed up with someone then
-
BabaChrissy joined the community
-
I've never interacted with you IC most in discord and still bad interaction
-
PolarGMC started following Polars NITRP Ban
-
Your Character or Steam Name: Leo J. Sugerman Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): STEAM_0:0:541641638 Your Discord ID#: polargmc Reason for ban: NITRP Length of ban: 5 days Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Dispute Why should you be unbanned?: I believe i was unjustly banned for NITRP. I was banned last night by Greenghost after i hopped off. Last thing i remember doing was a few stove bombings. I have been playing this server for 3 years on and off, and have never been banned for NITRP, as I have familiarized myself with the rules. The wording of No intent to roleplay indicates that over the full span of your playtime, you have never roleplayed, or intended to roleplay. Being a frequent player, i have continuously roleplayed, whether it was my time in Rudaj recruiting as an LT, to running Gopnik Traders a few days ago, to getting a man out of jail on the character i am now banned on, there is definitely intent to roleplay on my end, maybe not on others. A few stove bombs 1. Doesnt hurt/damage anybody, and 2. Is entirely in roleplay. If stovebombing were an indicator of NITRP, then half the civilian mains would be banned. A while ago, (~1 year ago) a few civilians hosted an event called "Stovebombing 101", and many stovebombs were detonated. Sure, they were a little annoying, but not harmful. Additional Information (images, videos, etc): Freeing a man facing charges of Battery, Fleeing, and some other charge i forgot: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/mQjTVxHX9LC4gjbYj?invite=cr-MSxkc3gsMjE2NDY4MjUy&v=43
-
Why are you and enzo on my dick 24/7 thought yall were over this.
-
Also, and Also, and Also! This isn't a true minus one, it is a hostage situation with the English language. A run-on sentence is a grammatical error that occurs when two or more independent clauses (complete sentences that could stand alone) are incorrectly combined into a single sentence without proper punctuation or connecting words
-
Make the clip quieter I can almost hear it