Ban Appeal- Ray

[ray]

Your Character or Steam Name: raia!

Your SteamID (Click to retrieve):https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199553723592/

Your Discord ID#: notraia.

Reason for ban: RDM | NITRP | POs

Length of ban: 1 Week

Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Dispute

Why should you be unbanned?
The two instances that I killed players were for valid RP reasons. As demonstrated in the clips; I was threatened both times with a firearm. Therefore, this not RDM.

In regards to NITRP, I was RPing and I would like to see a clip of myself NITRP. If it is about the claim that I RDM and it isn't true, so this is invalid.

Additional Information (images, videos, etc):
https://streamable.com/xv57uk
https://streamable.com/qli7wq

[Byte]

I've told you countless times to read the rules and I will again. Needs to be an active threat or have shot you for you to just turn and shoot them. Your own clips show you RDM'ing twice. Once, he pulls out his gun looking at the ground to check it as you had ran him over twice. The second time it's clearly someone not actually a threat to you as he immediately puts it away and crouches down to talk to you. The PO count comes from your admitted alt with an already gross record. Your ult first joined Dec 20th. In less than a month you've wracked up four notes, five bans, two PD blacklists and blacklists from countless factions. Do better.

Edited 1 hour ago by Byte

[ray]

1.The first clip has me accidentally running him over and waiting to see if he was alright, as he got up he pointed a gun at me and as I was leaving I heard a clicking noise from his weapon. It would be reasonable to assume that after running someone over, them pointing a gun at me is a threat to my life. In reaction, I fled and heard a clicking noise a empty gun would make. Knowing I can be easily shot while fleeing. I instead protected my life.

2. He pointed a gun at my head so I am going to shoot the guy. Anyone would have done the same thing so don't even try to argue that. 

3. Faction blacklists have nothing to do with the RDM case we're discussing.