i think you misunderstoond, on this post you commented on corruption and how its unclear. Your exact quote was,
What I commented in return was mentioning how you were already explained the corruption rules. Just because it was a different post doesn't invalidate the fact they told you. At this moment, the second post i quoted was made 19 hours ago, the canadian bacon post i screenshotted and sent that explained the rules was sent 23 hours ago. You even replied. When I commented asking whether or not you were already explained these rules, you lied and said no. My entire point in commenting was to call out how you said you believed corruption is unclarified, despite being clarified about these rules hours prior. I would also like to ask for where it says, "no corruption at all." This isnt stated in rule 11 of corruption rules.