DiscreetRavager

Currently seems there's a devide between how admins tackle the question on PKs for reasons such as leaving the family without permission. There's no doubt you can get that PK active, but then if that person appeals it seems to be a 50\50 shot per accepted and denied post. I think their needs to be consistency on how the staff tackles these PKs due to violation of these basic rules listed in a families Discord that I'm pretty sure most people directed their new recruits to. With that being said, I think this idea would straighten consistency on results of PK appeals within this subject. I don't think this is to replace people reading rules to new hires, I think it benefits more as a safe guard reason for staff and the person setting the order once it comes time to the appeals. +1

Timing of the mugging is labeled out in the rules, Likewise you may only make realistic demands, this means you can’t demand something unrealistic that the victim cannot deliver in order to kill them. Give them a realistic amount of time to comply. Don't order them to do something then shoot them < 5 seconds later, they barely have time to comply. In the clip, the moment they start saying "Stop moving" to the point they start shooting him is about exactly 5 seconds - he asked why about the same time, which I feel they could've easily responded "Or you're going to die," something a long that rather than relying on Tommy to notice guns that were on safety be switched off as he already was walking away - in the dark. +1

I would like to see the ability to pick the amount of the ordered item. +1

I don't think it's an awful idea with proper thought. Maybe the ability to choose the quantity of each item and the timing of it arriving be 1-2 minutes. Lasting 4-5 minutes. Have the shipments de-spawn instead of sitting at zero to prevent being littered. +/- Edit: Seems this will be looked at on another post and ideas are better.

So these people have to make a player report in the forums separately for ya'll to investigate an already proven-rulebreaker? Fair it was RDM, not fair that ole boy can do this to some more people before he gets shut down. That hard to do some work based off of proof posted here eh?

You're (Or someone else) obviously going to investigate ix_crazy_xi after 3 videos showing him to break the RDM Bait rule and NITRP hmm? Hell, there's an accepted player report for his OOC out of IC - contributing to his NITRP.

It's quite obvious throughout all three clips provided here who is and who isn't intending to RP. ix_crazy_xi Has not only been proven to have no intent for RP on all three clips, but proceeded to bait RDM and getting one of the only people I've seen who never breaks character to get banned. I've also had similar encounters with the ix_crazy_xi guy, funny how he didn't call "RDM" when he was gunned down for the same stupid shit. This kid needs to go, free ole' boy Chin. +1

Characters made with an older age such as mine (55) or others higher, seemingly would have a disadvantage if this were to be implemented. As I do generally like the idea, I think the point I brought up is a deal breaker. I also believe there is already some kind of system to combat against minges constantly going to jail, it's been made clear that previously convicted charges can be halved and applied to new charges. With both of these in mind, my vote is -1

Created a forum account after neglecting to do so for some time now, just to add my 2 cents. The server has indeed been shitting it's bricks all day, constant exact scenarios as the one clipped here. Might as well ban everyone driving during these spikes, I've walked got stuck in place and ended up across the map due to this many of times today. People have been complaining about it in advert/rumour since 10am est. +1