Jump to content

Ender123123

Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ender123123

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Ender123123's Achievements

Informant

Informant (2/14)

  • More Conversations...
  • Week One Done
  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

-6

Reputation

  1. Your Character or Steam Name: James Long Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:542523185 Your Discord ID#: 1201123490225475657 Reason for ban: Powergame | Char Abuse Length of ban: 2 weeks Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Dispute Why should you be unbanned?: I do not understand either of the reasons I'm getting banned. I didn't Powergame? The character I may have the same name as, which happens to be someone that was PK'ed on a government char, because staff was trying to find a character like that and said there wasn't, and someone sent a clip of that guy, but that char was never even mine. I never made a char named "James Long" before, the only closest to that was a char I had called "Jeremiah "Private" Long", which was a mob char and I no longer have it. I stole an ABA Pin from the Chief of Staff, yes, but that's not against the rules? It may have seemed a little mingy as I was trying to have fun pretending to be a fake lawyer once I stole a guy's ABA pin, but I really don't get why I got 2 weeks for this and not a warning if anything at all? Additional Information (images, videos, etc): Attached to the appeal.
  2. It was an example to reveal your fallacy and hearsays. You heard from these people that it's not fun, so I simply used your logic and also just said that X amount of people enjoy it so it cancels out, which I guess simply proves that you're still clinging onto that fallacy... I will make a report since there is no other way to solve this, I'm not doing this out of spite but because I don't want to have this ban on my record since I still can't understand or see my guilt, as there are no clips, and you provided me with only hearsays.
  3. What? I am trying not be be blunt but you just lied to my face. I did not threaten you with a staff report, nor did I say that at all. I was trying to plead my case that my RP was valid and you shut me off by banning me before I was done telling you how I wasn't guilty of the 3 rule breaks you accused me of and immediately banned me for. Now, I ask again: Where is the proof, the recordings, and especially the recordings when I threatened a staff report on you? You said you didn't think I was being malicious, but now you change your story and say I was threatening you with a staff report with 10 of my friends. What kind of nonsense is this? I don't know what delusions you're making right now, but you are making me have to do a staff report now, despite me never having to or wanting to do one before. I don't even know 10 people on this server, check my join date. This is just ridiculous, and I'm glad it's your last response. We'll be taking this to staff report in that case, since you're now just making up stuff that contradicts what you said earlier.
  4. I did not state above that I broke the rules. I simply prepared a defense of anything you might reply with and give a expalanation right away, since, from my POV, I did not engage in conflict intentionally, nor did I try to break any RDM rule. I was breaking the IC law by discharging my weapon illegally in a panic attack induced from PTSD. Again, my lawyer questioned the officers In-Character and their memory was quite vague. My lawyer said that they didn't even know how the discharge of my weapon went down exactly, but yet they claim I was trying to instill conflict. This, again, was clearly a attempt to frame me for anything they could OOC to get back at my great and skilled lawyer. I do not blame you for believing them, but still, if they can't fully remember these events but yet it's so important that I recieve a ban for them, then we should question their motives, not get me off the server. In fact, it was so important that they provided you with no physical evidence. 1. You only have logs and hearsays. 2. They were aware of the RP going on, since my lawyer was reminding them. Therefore: Reasonably, this is nowhere near a reason to ban, yet you decided to ban. I would understand a verbal warning and dicussion, but you intentionally cut me off from trying to argue my case by banning me fast enough to not hear all of what I had to say for myself, effectively ruining the RP experience not just for me, but for my lawyer who was still in there arguing for me. I understand you may have interpreted my RP as blunt, but at least talk to me and try to enforce a positive and optimistic way of dealing with this, not bringing me to a sit only to tell me that I'm about to not be able to play on a server and not letting me explain to you my side clearly for you to understand.
  5. Additionally, I would like to highlight that punishing, or even going as far as banning someone for breaking an In-Character law, whilst the police actively take care of it, is unreasonable. Not even counting the fact that I got out for it. Hiding behind rules? No. I am simply pointing out the fact that it's not my fault that they didn't PK my character or that you didn't do the PK in time, so I assumed I could just play it off as an injury recovered and turn myself in, which I did later, unless you're talking about something else. Also, yes. They knew my character had PTSD. My lawyer mentioned it to them several times, unless they weren't listening. I am not exactly sure what he said as I may not have been there for it, but I know he mentioned, at the very least, that my character had "problems", by which you can reasonably assume I'm roleplaying a mentally unwell person. As I said before, they intentionally framed it into an Out-Of-Character issue because my lawyer defended me well and I ended up with no charges. Their attempt to get me punished by any means is a fallacious way to get back at my lawyer for just being a good lawyer.
  6. Thank you for clarifying your side, however, for as far as I am aware, there is no proof to what you have banned me for in the first place. You didn't mention recieving any recording of the fact that I was allegedly minging. Would it not be in order for such recordings to be presented and the matter discussed? Instead I was banned for simply disagreeing and trying to notify you that this is fallacious. If you believe my RP was mingy or at the point of being harmful towards a faction, I would like a recording we can discuss first. I mean no offense, but I do not believe your side. Additionally, my point of it not being RDM still stands. I did not kill a single player and common sense here cannot be used if there is no recording you can provide. Or if you can provide one, then please highlight exactly how it was RDM and why it's worth a ban for a day, not a warning. Hopefully you reconsider your decision.
  7. Your Character or Steam Name: Marcin Sławinski | Ender Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:542523185 Your Discord ID#: 1201123490225475657 Reason for ban: NITRP | RDM | Cop Baiting Length of ban: 1 day Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Dispute Why should you be unbanned?: Let me explain this in a few parts, disputing every ban reason individually. First, the fallacious argumentation of the administrator that accused me of NITRP. According to the server rules posted on February 8, 2024: "NITRP = No intent to roleplay" I told the admin clearly, that my intention was to roleplay, based on the fact that I was roleplaying a former police senior officer experiencing several PTSD symptom flare-ups (The character I was on was a former senior police officer). The admin began arguing that I should have been PK'ed by police and using it as back up for his already poor arguments, despite it not being my fault that police didn't ask for a possible PK on me, and we played it off In-Character as me being injured and turning myself in later. As a senior officer, In-Character, I saw many dead bodies, participated in shootings and high-stress situations, so I believe roleplaying having PTSD attacks is not something that is "NITRP", if anything it's a well-thought out roleplay. The admin used the argument of the roleplay not being "fun" for everyone, which I don't think needs much explanation for why it is of fallacious origin. People had fun, some even laughed. It gave police something to work and figure out, since my intention was not to kill anyone In-Character. Even still, the very foundation of the "not fun for X" crumbles, since not everything has to be fun for players. Some things are less fun for other players, and some are more fun for others. With this logic we should have already disbanded the NYPD and removed many different server rules, since they're not fun but restricting for the players. Second, the false RDM. The definition of RDM, according to the server rules posted on February 8, 2024: "RDM = Random Death Match, Killing Players without valid reason." The definition does not match with what I was doing, and neither would ARDM even if the ban was changed. I had no intention of killing anyone without a valid reason. In fact, when I was still roleplaying the PTSD symptom flare-ups, I tried to avoid aiming at people if I discharged my weapon in a panic attack or because some other In-Character mental illness. If I did damage someone, it was not intentional and should be dealt with In-Character, not taken Out-Of-Character unless they want to PK me, but they did not want to, so the roleplay became that I was injured and rushed to the hospital, later arrested when I turned myself in. Third, Cop Baiting. There is no clear definition of "Cop Baiting", but general rule 18 on the server rules posted on February 8, 2024, states: "Do not Cop Bait just because you are bored." I did not cop bait just because I was bored. My character had a valid reason to get PTSD or other mental illnesses that caused them to do the things they did, which progressed my character's story. I was roleplaying PTSD, with a valid In-Character reason and background story, like actually participating in raids, shootings and other violent events before. Also, I was let out twice for the same "cop baiting", which, from the looks of it, was not cop baiting after all if they let me out twice for it with no charges or record. Additional Information (images, videos, etc): I was reported in the first place because Police Officers could not convict me and lacked evidence, or made the evidence they had no longer usable because of their own incompetence In-Character, so they turned to their last hope which is report me for the earlier roleplay and their failure to ask for a possible PK.
×
×
  • Create New...