01-15-2023, 07:22 PM
(01-15-2023, 06:30 PM)Rem Wrote: I am legitimately concerned on your ability of understanding on how staffing works. The one sit I had with you, you acted in a very childish manner then refused to comply with myself and another UA member. You then accused us of attacking you. This wasn't that long ago.I believe this was after a long time of trying to take care of the situation with another staff member, and then ultimately it felt like my concerns and questions were being thrown to the side. I believe there was 3-4 staff members that got involved and I will admittedly say it felt like once we got into the discord call you were trying to trap me when I was just trying to point out a potential hole in how the server runs. The conversation got heated on both ends, and for my end I apologize for it, I had those 2 mingy players who were trying to say I did something I didn't and I believe the admin working the case initially was on their side, and she got you and I forget the other admin involved. During the conversation, the other admin kept trying to corner me to say something I felt like wasn't true and I kept saying it wasn't the case but we kept going in circles, so the attacking was more meant as cornering than anything else. The issue revolved around the storage lockers and how PD interacted with individuals within the storage lockers. I had asked that if UA wanted the storage lockers to be a place for new players or non faction players to have a place to rent while they were on the server to put something into writing as during that time there was back and forth depending on which admin you spoke to as to what the PD could do at the storage lockers.
You had brought up a piece of legislation that Ben Roberts signed that said the storage lockers were a place that was allowed for anyone to build. But within the same document it pointed out that PD was to supervise these locations and could remove any person who was abusing the location (or something along that line). I argued that since that phrase was in the document it gave PD the right to "patrol" the storage lockers, not to open locked ones but to see what was going on, the individuals that were arrested, had built something at one of the lockers and it was open. We had an interaction that ultimately led to them being detained and as soon as I said they were being detained they instant broke RP, called admins and then began to complain and make up a story of me kicking their door down. I showed the clips I had that showed that wasn't the case, but was again asked why I was at the storage lockers in the first place. I believe in this interaction both sides had strong convictions and we kept going around in circles until we just stopped the conversation and voided the RP. I would ask not to judge my potential ability on the one interaction we've had that didn't need to be as big as it ended up being.