Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Everyone should post a clip of their PK's and we should vote which one is the best of all time (I don't care if this was 3 years ago, 1 month or whatever time it was)
  3. +1 I don't know the guy IC but he seems to have experience, seems know the rules and to be honest this is a well written staff application. Good luck
  4. -1 From what I've been reading you used exploits/in-game bugs for your advantage to avoid RP & ruin it. And apparently you've also came off a permanent ban. Just because you have "Anger issues" why should the community have to pay the price? You claim you love diverge so much but have 2 permanent bans they don't give those out like candy lol
  5. Use this format and good luck:
  6. Why would you evade a ban if you're apologetic and have bettered yourself now? Imho, you should have just appealed your original ban rather than circumventing it. Good luck!
  7. Today
  8. This is blank you should also follow the format or they will deny this I am assuming
  9. Use the format and good luck!
  10. Anything else you would like to contribute to this forums post? Now let's stop commenting unless it has anything new to involve this post instead of cluttering it.
  11. Qas

    Perma Ban Appeal

    Oh wow, using writing tool to make sure what is written was making sense and doesn't come off like mess? Crazy how that works. English isn't my first language, but sure let's pretend using grammar help = insincere. That's totally how intent work. id appreciate hearing actual feedback that could be provided and you taking it seriously. If your goal is to try dismiss the appeal because of how it is worded or where I get help for phrasing, that's not useful for anyone. If you don't want to contribute something useful, maybe reconsider why your commenting.
  12. So, you're so sorry that you had to use AI to write an apology. -1.
  13. you dont know shit about shit lil bro
  14. I believe that the reason for your ban was absolutely dumbfounded just for it to be "Bye." It leaves you with 0 context especially when making an appeal. I would weigh in here; depending on how severe your case is, it looks like it's been a while since you RDMed, something I am assuming was the reason why you got banned if the reason was changed. You have been banned for two years I think you should be unbanned, again this is just imo.
  15. Pearce

    Ban appeal

    You should follow the format. Honestly, this is also a very poorly made appeal if you are trying to be apologetic.
  16. Your Character or Steam Name: Your SteamID (Click to retrieve): Your Discord ID#: Reason for ban: Length of ban: Reason for appeal (dispute/apology): Why should you be unbanned? Additional Information (images, videos, etc):
  17. xrexm34 76561198798632199 Young_Toxiccc#2836 Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID,STEAM_0:1:97411951 Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID, STEAM_0:0:590112455 perm I sincerely apologize for my behavior, i was a dumb 16 year old kid, i am better now. i really love mafia rp with a passion, i would be really grateful if my appeal is successful I should be unbanned because I now know that doing stupid actions will have consequences, I do wanna take your server seriously and will do better
  18. will.801

    Ban appeal

    is the reply better or should the reason to be unbanned should be more better ?
  19. will.801

    Ban appeal

    xrexm34 76561198798632199 Young_Toxiccc#2836 Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID,STEAM_0:1:97411951 Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID, STEAM_0:0:590112455 perm I sincerely apologize for my behavior, i was a dumb 16 year old kid, i am better now. i really love mafia rp with a passion, i would be really grateful if my appeal is successful i should be unbanned because i was really dumb and immature but not anymore, i am now grown and would really want to play mafia rp again, please i love playing your guys server its the only enjoying server on garry’s mod
  20. Hello @will.801, Thank you for making this appeal. Before we get started on reviewing this I want to clarify as to why the ban was extended to permanent at that time. (2021) CONSOLE Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID, STEAM_0:1:97411951 2021-03-21 15:05:56 CONSOLE Ban length changed to permanent due to ban evasion attempt on SteamID, STEAM_0:0:590112455 2021-03-23 22:46:23 That being said, could you please edit your appeal to be more presentable and give better structured reasoning for an unban. You can review other previously accepted appeals to see how they format and structure themselves here -> https://divergenet.works/forum/32-accepted/
  21. will.801

    Ban appeal

    xrexm34 76561198798632199 Young_Toxiccc#2836 minge being immature perm I sincerely apologize for my behavior, i was a dumb 16 year old kid, i am better now. i really love mafia rp with a passion, i would be really grateful if my appeal is successful i should be unbanned because i was really dumb and immature but not anymore, i am now grown and would really want to play mafia rp again, please i love playing your guys server its the only enjoying server on garry’s mod
  22. I understand it can be frustrating, but conflicts are dynamic and ever changing based on the circumstances or issues that present themselves. They also can change based on what the two alliances agree on, like that melee brawl in the park, it's more about helping to create roleplay instead of just gunning people down, these aren't hard rules that will apply to every single conflict moving forward they are unique to the situation of this particular conflict, and sometimes they need to be added or modified based on the issues or complaints either side has. So since they are dynamic they can't be hard added to a post or rule page, and they only apply to the select factions in a current conflict, meaning the sole responsibility lies on the faction leaders or alliance members in sharing those messages and rules with their underlings. Now I was told that the Gambino HC had notified the relevant people in their faction of the safehouse conditions, so I have no reason to believe the circumstances surrounding it are in any doubt as i trust that they did their due diligence, especially considering this hasn't happened to anyone else.
  23. Can all this new shit be added to the conflict rules? I think it’s unfair that lower ranks get punished because their faction leaders haven’t told them specifically. seems to be a lot of the issues with the constant switch of rules. for example the graffiti. People were doing KOS then were told with a gun out. Everyone presumed safety. now it’s you have to aim a gun at them.
  24. Thank you for applying to the Diverge Networks staff team. Unfortunately, your application has been denied. You may apply again in 30 days. You may apply sooner if you receive permission from a Super Administrator or higher.
  25. Yesterday
  26. I'll reiterate the points made when i spoke to Happy. - Safehouses were established as part of the conflict escalation as agree'ed on by both alliances. It aims to provide protected buildings for each side to hide high command members who may be subject to hits during the conflict. Both sides were made clear that if a raid or shootout occurs on a safehouse it can and will be a pk for the attackers whereas non safehouses can be raided without the regular consequence of a pk. What the two safehouses were should and would have been communicated to you by your faction leader. Several points were brought up. - They had keys - They had a room there (hence the keys) - They didn't start the shooutout! When the conflict started the owners of the imperial requested all Gambino keys were removed from their doors and for some reason they weren't taken off the front doors, either due to an error or a saving issue. With that being said, knowing you had no reason or business to have keys to that building instead of reporting the issue to get it resolved you abused the fact you had them to gain access to a building you shouldn't have had. Causing issue and getting killed, then using the key excuse as a way to get out of it instead? A point was made that having the keys were valid because the faction had a room there, but when i asked what the code for the doors were no one was able to produce the correct code for the month of April, proving that argument to be null; or argued in bad faith. Now, whether you had keys or not, the main issue is the undeniable fact that you went to an opposing safehouse, with the direct intention of starting a problem (dropping trash) and when confronted attempted to leave and then escalated via punching them. From any other perspective how else is that meant to be perceived other than an attack on a safehouse? They don't know your intention, they don't know if the raid is sanctioned or not, you could have been scouting out looking for one of their HC members to PK for all they know. You can't go and start a gun fight at an opposing safehouse then say "ope well it was actually just RDM" or "yea well but i have keys so its ok" In your own clip you clearly coordinate the dumping of the trash, and also use /y to yell asking"u got keys??" + had jew curls on, pretending to be an employee there, pretty evident you two went to drop trash, draw attention to it, then when they pressed Gallo you were going to shoot and wipe them. The only logical explanation is you were somehow unaware it was a safehouse (Which means you're blaming your faction leader) or simply believed because you had keys / it wasn't a 'sanctioned raid' you could avoid the pk. As for the metagame claim the clip provided by the opposing individual clearly shows them deafened in discord and directly witnessing you enter and drop the trash, so no proof of metagame to be had. If the roles were reversed and the opposing alliance had done the same sort of dumping -> shootout on your safehouses then the result would be the same, that person would be pk'ed. It's pretty evident when the situation is fully explained it becomes obvious as to why this happened, rather than throwing around hearsay accusations.
  27. I am inclined to agree with Jmoorsey, I think the proper punishment for you is to wait those full 30 days, especially given your last ban appeal. Maybe it will drive home the point of what a permanent ban means.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...